22 research outputs found
Evaluation of a newly introduced tonsillectomy operation record for the analysis of regional post-tonsillectomy bleed data: a quality improvement project at the London North West Healthcare NHS Trust
The primary objective of this audit and quality improvement project was to retrospectively analyse regional post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage data as per national recommendations. However, this process highlighted the need for high-quality routinely collected data; something that was not always available via retrospective audit and thus does not enable formal aetiological factor analyses. We therefore created further secondary objectives to facilitate our primary audit objective. These secondary objectives were (1) to introduce a standardised tonsillectomy operation proforma to improve completeness and quality of routinely collected data and (2) to evaluate and validate proforma use and usefulness in improving using routine data collection to help with a repeated audit of post-tonsillectomy haemorrhages with the eventual aim to help improve operative outcomes by identifying potential associated factors. The retrospective audit component, the prospective audit and the quality improvement component were all carried out at the Northwick Park Hospital and Central Middlesex Hospital (London North West Healthcare NHS Trust). First, 642 tonsillectomy records (2012-2014) were retrospectively reviewed. Free-text operative documentation and, where possible, potential factors associated with post-tonsillectomy haemorrhages were analysed. In addition, completeness of data available before and after the introduction of (A) a new paper-based and (B) electronic surgical record proforma was reviewed (2014-2015). Over a 2-year period, 62 of the 642 (9.7%) audited tonsillectomy patients had a post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage, and 19 of these (2.9%) had to return to theatre for surgical arrest of the haemorrhage. Bipolar diathermy was the most commonly used technique. During this period, data available from routine operative documentation in the surgical operation notes were variable and thus did not allow identification of potential factors associated with post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage. The completeness and quality of data significantly improved after the introduction of a standardised paper-based proforma with sections for required details based on known risk factors for post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage and required operative details. Quality and completeness of data was further improved after the introduction of an electronic version. This electronic proforma will allow prospective spiral auditing results, early identification of raised bleeding rate, and provide individual surgeon audit results
A tablet computer-assisted motor and language skills training programme to promote communication development in children with autism: development and pilot study
Autism is a heterogenous condition, encompassing many different subtypes and presentations. Of those people with autism who lack communicative speech, some are more skilled at receptive language than their expressive difficulty might suggest. This disparity between what can be spoken and what can be understood correlates with motor and especially oral motor abilities, and thus may be a consequence of limits to oral motor skill. Point OutWords, tablet-based software targeted for this subgroup, builds on autistic perceptual and cognitive strengths to develop manual motor and oral motor skills prerequisite to communication by pointing or speaking. Although typical implementations of user-centred design rely on communicative speech, Point OutWords users were involved as co-creators both directly via their own nonverbal behavioural choices and indirectly via their communication therapists’ reports; resulting features include vectorised, high-contrast graphics, exogenous cues to help capture and maintain attention, customisable reinforcement prompts, and accommodation of open-loop visuomotor control
Cross-sectional survey of a sample of UK primary care dental professionals' experiences of sharps injuries and perception of access to occupational health support
Background:
The 2013 Sharps Regulations were introduced to minimise the risk of sharps injuries and blood borne virus transmission throughout healthcare. Occupational health (OH) services are pivotal for helping employers implement these regulations. Despite this, no research has been conducted on the prevalence of sharps injuries, underreporting of injuries or access to OH among primary care dental professionals in the UK since 2013.
Aim:
To estimate the prevalence of sharps injuries, the level of underreporting and of self-reported access to an OH service both for the care of sharps injuries and for general health and wellbeing.
Method:
A cross-sectional survey was administered at the 2017 British Dental Association (BDA) Conference and Exhibition in Manchester, and at the 2017 BDA Scottish Conference and Exhibition in Glasgow. The survey covered questions relating to sharps injuries and OH support. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS Version 22 (IBM Corp., 2013).
Results:
A total of 796 delegates participated, of whom 166 (20.8%) had experienced a sharps injury in the past year and 58 (35%) did not report the incident. Of the participants, 190 (23.9%) reported no, or uncertain, access to OH support. Most respondents' practices had a sharps safety policy (771; 96.9%), but fewer (611; 76.8%) had received training on the prevention of sharps injuries and neither policy nor training were associated with incident reporting.
Conclusion:
Despite the introduction of the sharps regulations, sharps injuries and underreporting of injuries remain prevalent among those practising in primary dental care. Our results also suggest that there are significant shortfalls in OH support, at a time when changes to guidance on health clearance and management of BBV infected healthcare workers, in addition to sharps injury management, increase the need for such services
The current role of tissue engineering in head and neck reconstruction
Tissue engineering is an emerging field that has the potential to
revolutionize the field of reconstructive surgery by providing
off-the-shelf replacement products. The literature has become replete
with tissue engineering studies, and the aim of this article is to
review the contemporary application of tissue-engineered products. The
use of tissue-engineered cartilage, bone and nerve in head and neck
reconstruction is discussed
The current role of tissue engineering in head and neck reconstruction
Tissue engineering is an emerging field that has the potential to
revolutionize the field of reconstructive surgery by providing
off-the-shelf replacement products. The literature has become replete
with tissue engineering studies, and the aim of this article is to
review the contemporary application of tissue-engineered products. The
use of tissue-engineered cartilage, bone and nerve in head and neck
reconstruction is discussed
Quality of life and outcomes research in head and neck cancer: A review of the state of the discipline and likely future directions
Quality of life (QOL) is by definition a multi-dimensional global
construct that has become an increasingly important outcome measure in
cancer treatment. The impact of a head and neck cancer (HNC) diagnosis
on the person and the consequences of its treatment cross multiple
functional domains that have a clear and direct influence on one’s
post-treatment well-being and associated QOL. The evaluation of QOL and
performance outcome in cancer is critical to optimal patient care,
comprehensive evaluation of treatment alternatives, and the development
of informed rehabilitation and patient education services. Despite the
difficulties of going from concept to quantification of patient
perceptions, the number of instruments available to measure QOL
psychometrically has increased rapidly. Assessments can now be made in a
variety of distinctive ways using both specific and generic measures.
There is no gold-standard questionnaire and the choice is based on
psychometric properties, research objectives and study design. QOL
assessment has evolved over the years into an organised scientific
discipline, such that useful insights can be obtained by a review of the
current literature. However, more work needs to be done to improve the
applicability and clinical utility of QOL assessment. Most importantly.
QOL studies should be reported in such a way as to provide clinically
meaningful data to physicians and surgeons, in order to link research to
clinical practice. Further attention should be paid to the development
of newer theoretical models, minimalist approaches, development of more
sensitive and specific instruments and the effective use of modern
technology to achieve this objective. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published
by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved