Foregut Surgery in the Modern Era: A National Survey

Background: Foregut surgery is technically complex. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to high-stakes surgery outcomes, including mortality and complications. In addition, the use of advanced technology including minimally invasive approaches has been introduced. The current study aims to determine national trends in utilization and outcomes of potentially curative cancer resections of the foregut, including esophagus, stomach, liver, and pancreas. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried to identify all esophageal, gastric, liver and pancreas resections performed for cancer during 1998-2009. Annual incidence, major in-hospital postoperative complications, length of stay and in-hospital mortality were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analysis performed by chi square and logistic regression. For all comparisons, p-values Results: 298,871 patients (nationally-weighted) underwent cancer directed foregut surgery 1998-2009. Of those 19,002 (6%) were esophagectomies, 123,198 (41%) were gastrectomies, 62,313 (21%) were hepatectomies and 94,358 (32%) were pancreatectomies. From early years (1998-2000) to late years (2007-2009) use of laparoscopy in foregut surgery increased from 3% to 5%. Laparoscopy in esophagectomy increased the most from 1% to 5%, while its use in hepatectomy remained unchanged at 4%. Gastrectomy and pancreatectomy involving minimally invasive techniques increased from 2% to 5% and 5% to 6%, respectively. For all four foregut surgery types, patient comorbidities increased over time; patients with ≥2 major comorbidities increased from 53% to 64%. Conversely, patient mortality and length of stay (LOS) decreased over time. However, we observed an increase in complications for all sites combined from 22.8% to 24.4%. Laparoscopy was not significantly associated with decreased complications, but was associated with lower mortality when compared to open resection alone 3.1% vs. 5%. Independent predictors of increased complications included older age, gender, higher comorbidity, hospital volume. Older age, male sex, higher comorbidity, low volume center and non-use of laparoscopy were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: Foregut surgery in the modern era is being increasingly deployed on sicker patients. While decreased in-hospital mortality and LOS are commendable, complication rates remain substantial and nondecreasing. Minimally invasive techniques have minor but increasing penetrance in foregut surgery. Our results suggest comparable advances and potential pitfalls among major types of foregut surgery in the current era

Endemic Gallbladder Cancer: Is There a Role for Prophylactic Cholecystectomy?

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an often lethal malignancy with variable distribution. Incidence in the United States is low. However, in areas of Central/South America, Central Europe, Japan, and the Indian subcontinent, GBC is a major cause of cancer death. Cholecystectomy is safe and commonly performed worldwide. Thus, prophylactic cholecystectomy (PCCY) has been proposed in regions with endemic GBC. We developed a simple decision model to assist caregivers in determining the optimal strategy for managing GBC based on local incidence and technological capabilities. Methods: Rates of disease and outcomes were derived from a review of the literature. Using TreeAge-Pro software, a decision model was created to simulate expected health outcomes for populations with high GBC incidence, following 3 treatment strategies: no early intervention, one-time screening ultrasound (US), or PCCY. Lifetime cancer-specific survival was the outcome of interest. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine threshold values. Results: Based on our model, populations where lifetime risk of GBC exceeds 0.4% may benefit from early intervention by US or PCCY. Two-way sensitivity analysis shows that over a relatively narrow range of disease incidence, US may be favored if sensitivity exceeds 50%. In many cases where lifetime risk exceeds 1%, PCCY may improve survival. Conclusions: GBC varies in incidence, but affects many individuals in some populations in the Americas. The lethality of GBC may justify aggressive public health intervention including screening or prophylactic cholecystectomy. Decision analysis models using best-available evidence may help determine the optimal treatment of individuals at risk for GBC

Is pancreatic cancer palliatable? A national study

Background: Pancreatic cancer is frequently diagnosed at advanced stages where potentially curative resection is no longer possible. Palliative procedures can be performed; however, results on a national level are unknown. This study examines pancreatic cancer patients who underwent potentially palliative procedures including gastric bypass, biliary bypass surgery, celiac block, biliary stent, gastrostomy or jejunostomy, and examines post-intervention complications and 30-day mortality. Methods: SEER-Medicare 1991-2005 was used to identify patients with Stage 3-4 pancreatic cancer. Complication rates were calculated including post-op infection, myocardial infarction, aspiration pneumonia, DVT/PE, pulmonary compromise, gastric bleed, acute renal failure, and reoperation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Finally, Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to control for the effects of age, sex, race, stage, and resection. Results: Of 22,314 pancreatic cancer patients, 858 (3.9%) patients were Stage 3, and 11,149 (50.0%) stage 4. Post-procedure median survival for all patients is approximately two months, with longest survival for biliary bypass patients (3.2mo, 95% CI(2.9-3.7), and lowest survival for jejunostomy 1.3 mo (1.2-1.5) and gastrostomy 1.5 mo (1.4-1.8). Post-procedure 30-day mortality was highest for gastrostomy patients at 41.5%; followed by jejunostomy (39.1%), celiac plexus block (30.0%), gastric bypass (23.8%), biliary bypass (17.8%), and biliary stent (21.2%). The rate of complications averaged 40%, with highest rate for gastrostomy (47.4%) and gastric bypass (45.3%) and lowest for celiac plexus block (29.3%). Stage 4 disease was an independent predictor of death for patients undergoing five out of six procedures. Conclusion: We found that morbidity and mortality of palliative procedures in unresectable pancreatic cancer is high, especially in stage 4 patients. Further studies need to be conducted to identify patients who will have sufficient expected post-procedure survival to benefit from these palliative interventions

Is it worth looking? Abdominal imaging after pancreatic cancer resection: a national study

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal imaging is often performed after pancreatic cancer resection. We attempted to quantify the volume and estimate the cost of complex imaging after pancreatectomy nationwide, and to determine whether their frequent use confers benefit. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent resection were identified in Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare (1991-2005). Claims for abdominal imaging RESULTS: Eleven thousand eight hundred fifty studies were performed on 2,217 patients. Ten thousand five hundred forty-two (89%) were CT scans. The median number of scans doubled from three in 1991 to six in 2005 (p \u3c 0.0001). Among patients with sufficient survival to allow for analysis, 51.3% received annual CT scans, while only 32.4% of top-performing patients received annual scans. Univariate analysis of the 10% of patients with superior survival did not reveal any significant benefit associated with annual imaging. CONCLUSION: Utilization of complex imaging after pancreatic cancer resection has increased substantially among Medicare beneficiaries, driven primarily by an increasing number of CT scans. Our study demonstrated no significant survival benefit among patients who received scans on a routine basis

Colectomy performance improvement within NSQIP 2005-2008

BACKGROUND: All open and laparoscopic colectomies submitted to the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) were evaluated for trends and improvements in operative outcomes. METHODS: 48,247 adults (\u3e/=18 y old) underwent colectomy in ACS NSQIP, as grouped by surgical approach (laparoscopic versus open), urgency (emergent versus elective), and operative year (2005 to 2008). Primary outcomes measured morbidity, mortality, perioperative, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The proportion of laparoscopic colectomies performed increased annually (26.3% to 34.0%), while open colectomies decreased (73.7% to 66.0%; P \u3c 0.0001). Most emergent colectomies were open procedures (93.5%) representing 24.3% of all open cases. The overall risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality for all colectomy procedures did not show a statistically significant change over time, however, morbidity and mortality increased among open colectomies (r = 0.03) and decreased among laparoscopic colectomies (r = -0.04; P \u3c 0.0001). Postoperative complications reduced significantly including superficial surgical site infections (9.17% to 8.20%, P \u3c 0.004), pneumonia (4.60% to 3.97%, P \u3c 0.0001), and sepsis (4.72%, 2005; 6.81%, 2006; 5.62%, 2007; 5.09%, 2008; P \u3c 0.0002). Perioperative improvements included operative time (169.2 to 160.0 min), PRBC transfusions (0.27 to 0.25 units) and length of stay (10.5 to 6.61 d; P \u3c 0.0001). CONCLUSION: It appears that laparoscopic colectomies are growing in popularity over open colectomies, but the need for emergent open procedures remains unchanged. Across all colectomies, however, key postoperative and perioperative complications have improved over time. Participation in ACS NSQIP demonstrates quality improvement and may encourage greater enrollment

National trends in pancreaticoduodenal trauma: interventions and outcomes

OBJECTIVES: Pancreaticoduodenal trauma (PDT) is associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. In this study, contemporary trends were analysed using national data. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 1998-2009 was queried for patients with PDT. Interventions including any operation (Any-Op) and pancreas-specific surgery (PSURG) were identified. Trends in treatment and outcomes were determined [complications, length of stay (LoS), mortality] for the Any-Op, PSURG and non-operative (Non-Op) groups. Analyses included chi-squared tests, Cochran-Armitage trend tests and logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 27 216 patients (nationally weighted) with PDT were identified. Over time, the frequency of PDT increased by 8.3%, whereas the proportion of patients submitted to PSURG declined (from 21.7% to 19.8%; P = 0.0004) and the percentage of patients submitted to non-operative management increased (from 56.7% to 59.1%; P = 0.01). In the Non-Op group, mortality decreased from 9.7% to 8.6% (P \u3c 0.001); morbidity and LoS remained unchanged at approximately 40% and approximately 12 days, respectively. In the PSURG group, mortality remained stable at approximately 15%, complications increased from 50.2% to 71.8% (P \u3c 0.0001) and LoS remained stable at approximately 21 days. For all PDT patients, significant independent predictors of mortality included: the presence of combined pancreatic and duodenal injuries; penetrating trauma, and age over 50 years. Having any operation (Any-Op) was associated with mortality, but PSURG was not a predictor of death. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of operations for PDT has declined without affecting mortality, but operative morbidity increased significantly over the 12 years to 2009. The development of an evidence-based approach to invasive manoeuvres and an early multidisciplinary approach involving pancreatic surgeons may improve outcomes in patients with these morbid injuries

Is routine intraoperative cholangiogram necessary in the twenty-first century? A national view

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) can define biliary ductal anatomy. Routine IOC has been proposed previously. However, current surgeon IOC utilization practice patterns and outcomes are unclear. METHODS: Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2004-2009 was queried for patients with acute biliary disease undergoing cholecystectomy (CCY). Analyses only included surgeons performing \u3e/=10 CCY/year. We dichotomized surgeons into a routine IOC group vs. selective. Outcomes included bile duct injury, complications, mortality, length of stay, and cost. RESULTS: Of the nonweighted patients, 111,815 underwent CCY. A total of 4,740 actual surgeon yearly volumes were examined. On average, each surgeon performed 23.6 CCYs and 7.9 IOCs annually, using IOC in 33 % of cases. The routine IOC group used IOC for 96 % of cases, whereas selective IOC group used IOC approximately 25 % of the time. Routine IOC surgeons had no difference in mortality (0.4 %) or rate of bile duct injury (0.25 vs. 0.26 %), but higher overall complications (7.3 vs. 6.8 %, p = 0.04). Patients of routine IOC surgeons received more additional procedures and incurred higher costs. CONCLUSION: Routine IOC does not decrease the rate of bile duct injury, but is associated with significant added cost. Surgeons\u27 routine use of IOC is correlated with increased rates of postsurgical procedures, and is associated with increased overall complications. These data suggest routine IOC may not improve outcomes

Perioperative mortality after pancreatectomy: A risk score to aid decision-making

BACKGROUND: Undergoing a pancreatectomy obligates the patient to risks and benefits. For complex operations such as pancreatectomy, the objective assessment of baseline risks may be useful in decision-making. We developed an integer-based risk score estimating in-hospital mortality after pancreatectomy, incorporating institution-specific mortality rates to enhance its use. METHODS: Pancreatic resections were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1998-2006), and categorized as proximal, distal, or nonspecified by the International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition. Logistic regression and bootstrap methods were used to estimate in-hospital mortality using demographics, diagnosis, comorbidities (Charlson index), procedure, and hospital volume; 80% of this cohort was selected randomly to create the score and 20% was used for validation. Score assignments were subsequently individually fitted to risk distributions around specific mortality rates. RESULTS: Sixteen thousand one hundred sixteen patient discharges were identified. Nationwide in-hospital mortality was 5.3%. Integers were assigned to predictors (age group, Charlson index, sex, diagnosis, pancreatectomy type, and hospital volume) and applied to an additive score. Three score groups were defined to stratify in-hospital mortality (national mortality, 1.3%, 4.9%, and 14.3%; P \u3c .0001), with sufficient discrimination of derivation and validation sets (C statistics, 0.72 and 0.74). Score groups were shifted algorithmically to calculate risk based on institutional data (eg, with institutional mortality of 2.0%, low-, medium-, and high-risk patient groups had 0.5%, 1.9%, and 5.4% mortality, respectively). A web-based tool was developed and is available online (http://www.umassmed.edu/surgery/panc_mortality_custom.aspx). CONCLUSION: To maximize patient benefit, objective assessment of risk for major procedures is necessary. We developed a Surgical Outcomes Analysis and Research risk score predicting pancreatectomy mortality that combines national and institution-specific data to enhance decision-making. This type of risk stratification tool may identify opportunities to improve care for patients undergoing specific operative procedures