Patient-tailored adoptive immunotherapy with EBV-specific T cells from related and unrelated donors

BACKGROUND: Adoptive transfer of EBV-specific T cells can restore specific immunity in immunocompromised patients with EBV-associated complications. METHODS: We provide results of a personalized T-cell manufacturing program evaluating donor, patient, T-cell product and outcome data. Patient-tailored clinical-grade EBV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (EBV-CTL) products from stem cell donors (SCD), related third party donors (TPD) or unrelated TPD from the allogeneic T-cell donor registry (alloCELL) established at Hannover Medical School were manufactured by immunomagnetic selection using CliniMACS Plus or Prodigy device and EBV PepTivators EBNA-1 and Select. Consecutive manufacturing processes were evaluated and patient outcome and side effects were retrieved by retrospective chart analysis. RESULTS: Forty clinical-grade EBV-CTL products from SCDs, related or unrelated TPDs were generated for 37 patients with and without transplantation (Tx) history within 5 days (median) after donor identification. 34 patients received 1-14 EBV-CTL products (fresh and cryopreserved). EBV-CTL transfer led to complete response in 20 of 29 patients who were evaluated for clinical response. No infusion-related toxicity was reported. EBV-specific T cells in patients' blood were detectable in 16/18 monitored patients (89 %) after transfer and correlated with clinical response. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, personalized clinical-grade manufacturing of EBV-CTL products via immunomagnetic selection from SCD, related or unrelated TPD is feasible in a timely manner. Overall, EBV-CTL were clinically effective and well-tolerated. Our data suggest EBV-CTL as promising therapeutic approach for immunocompromised patients with refractory EBV-associated diseases beyond HSCT as well as patients with pre-existing organ dysfunction

Robust Identification of Suitable T-Cell Subsets for Personalized CMV-Specific T-Cell Immunotherapy Using CD45RA and CD62L Microbeads

Viral infections and reactivations remain a serious obstacle to successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). When antiviral drug treatment fails, adoptive virus-specific T-cell transfer provides an effective alternative. Assuming that naive T cells (TN) are mainly responsible for GvHD, methods were developed to generate naive T-cell-depleted products while preserving immune memory against viral infections. We compared two major strategies to deplete potentially alloreactive T cells: CD45RA and CD62L depletion and analyzed phenotype and functionality of the resulting CD45RA−/CD62L− naive T-cell-depleted as well as CD45RA+/CD62L+ naive T-cell-enriched fractions in the CMV pp65 and IE1 antigen model. CD45RA depletion resulted in loss of terminally differentiated effector memory T cells re-expressing CD45RA (TEMRA), and CD62L depletion in loss of central memory T cells (TCM). Based on these differences in target cell-dependent and target cell-independent assays, antigen-specific T-cell responses in CD62L-depleted fraction were consistently 3–5 fold higher than those in CD45RA-depleted fraction. Interestingly, we also observed high donor variability in the CD45RA-depleted fraction, resulting in a substantial loss of immune memory. Accordingly, we identified donors with expected response (DER) and unexpected response (DUR). Taken together, our results showed that a naive T-cell depletion method should be chosen individually, based on the immunophenotypic composition of the T-cell populations present