Comparison of Reduced-Intensity and Conventional Myeloablative Regimens for Allogeneic Transplantation in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

AbstractReduced-intensity regimens (RIRs) are being used with increasing frequency in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) undergoing allogeneic transplantation. The impact of dose reduction on relapse and survival has not been extensively studied. We performed a retrospective analysis of 88 patients conditioned with conventional myeloablative regimens (CMRs) (n = 48) and an RIR (n = 40) of fludarabine 125 mg/m2 and melphalan 140 mg/m2. Compared with the patients receiving CMR, those receiving RIR were older, had more often failed autologous transplantation, and had more frequently received peripheral blood and unrelated donor transplants. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was provided with cyclosporine + methotrexate ± prednisone for the CMR and with cyclosporine + mycophenolate ± methotrexate for the RIR. The relapse rate was significantly lower in the patients receiving CMR than in those receiving RIR (13% vs 28%; P = .05). The 1-year transplantation-related mortality rate was 33% for CMR and 28% for RIR (P = .40). Kaplan-Meier 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 52% and 46% for CMR versus 53% and 40% for RIR (P = not significant). Using cumulative incidence functions based on competing risks, univariate analysis, and treatment-related prognostic factors, we found that higher treatment intensity (P = .03; relative risk [RR] = 35%) and absence of previous autologous transplantation (P = .0007; RR = 20%) were associated with a lower relapse rate. Using a Cox univariate proportional hazards model, we found that chemosensitive disease at transplantation (P = .05; RR = 57%) and absence of previous autologous transplantation (P = .002; RR = 37%) were associated with improved survival. Our observation of similar survival in the patients receiving CMR and those receiving RIR confirms that RIRs are feasible alternatives for high-risk patients with NHL; however, the data suggest that reduced treatment intensity and previous autologous transplantation are associated with increased relapse

Tandem autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with primary refractory or poor risk recurrent Hodgkin lymphoma.

UNLABELLED: Although autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) appears to offer a survival advantage over conventional therapy, only approximately 25% to 35% of patients with primary progressive or poor-risk recurrent HL can achieve durable remission after ASCT, with disease progressive after transplant accounting for most of the treatment failures. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the toxicities and efficacy of a tandem transplant approach in this subgroup of patients. Between April 1998 and March 2000, 46 patients were enrolled in the study. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: primary progressive (n = 28) or recurrent HL (n = 18) with at least 1 of the following poor prognostic factors: first complete remission (CR)(n = 15) or extra-nodal disease (n = 4) or B symptoms at relapse (n = 4). The first cycle consisted of melphalan (150 mg/m(2)) alone. The second cycle consisted of fractionated total body irradiation (FTBI) 1200 cGy or BCNU (450 mg/m(2)) in combination with etoposide (60 mg/kg) and cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg). Of the 46 patients, 5 (11%) did not receive the planned tandem transplants because of inadequate stem cell collection for 2 ASCT. After a median of 64 days (25-105), 41 patients received the second ASCT. With a median follow-up of 5.3 years (1.6-8.1), the 5-year estimate of overall survival, progression-free survival, and freedom from progression were 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 40%-69%), 49% (95% CI, 34%-63%), and 55% (95%CI, 40%-70%), respectively. Our mature results from this study suggest that in patients with primary progressive or poor risk recurrent HL, this tandem ASCT program is effective and well tolerated and compares favorably with the conventional single transplant

Tandem autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with primary refractory or poor risk recurrent Hodgkin lymphoma.

UNLABELLED: Although autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) appears to offer a survival advantage over conventional therapy, only approximately 25% to 35% of patients with primary progressive or poor-risk recurrent HL can achieve durable remission after ASCT, with disease progressive after transplant accounting for most of the treatment failures. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the toxicities and efficacy of a tandem transplant approach in this subgroup of patients. Between April 1998 and March 2000, 46 patients were enrolled in the study. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: primary progressive (n = 28) or recurrent HL (n = 18) with at least 1 of the following poor prognostic factors: first complete remission (CR)(n = 15) or extra-nodal disease (n = 4) or B symptoms at relapse (n = 4). The first cycle consisted of melphalan (150 mg/m(2)) alone. The second cycle consisted of fractionated total body irradiation (FTBI) 1200 cGy or BCNU (450 mg/m(2)) in combination with etoposide (60 mg/kg) and cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg). Of the 46 patients, 5 (11%) did not receive the planned tandem transplants because of inadequate stem cell collection for 2 ASCT. After a median of 64 days (25-105), 41 patients received the second ASCT. With a median follow-up of 5.3 years (1.6-8.1), the 5-year estimate of overall survival, progression-free survival, and freedom from progression were 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 40%-69%), 49% (95% CI, 34%-63%), and 55% (95%CI, 40%-70%), respectively. Our mature results from this study suggest that in patients with primary progressive or poor risk recurrent HL, this tandem ASCT program is effective and well tolerated and compares favorably with the conventional single transplant