6 research outputs found
Prognostic cell biological markers in cervical cancer patients primarily treated with (chemo)radiation: a systematic review
The aim of this study was to systematically review the prognostic and predictive significance of cell biological markers in cervical cancer patients primarily treated with (chemo)radiation. A PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane literature search was performed. Studies describing a relation between a cell biological marker and survival in >/=50 cervical cancer patients primarily treated with (chemo)radiation were selected. Study quality was assessed, and studies with a quality score of 4 or lower were excluded. Cell biological markers were clustered on biological function, and the prognostic and predictive significance of these markers was described. In total, 42 studies concerning 82 cell biological markers were included in this systematic review. In addition to cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-ag) levels, markers associated with poor prognosis were involved in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling (EGFR and C-erbB-2) and in angiogenesis and hypoxia (carbonic anhydrase 9 and hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha). Epidermal growth factor receptor and C-erbB-2 were also associated with poor response to (chemo)radiation. In conclusion, EGFR signaling is associated with poor prognosis and response to therapy in cervical cancer patients primarily treated with (chemo)radiation, whereas markers involved in angiogenesis and hypoxia, COX-2, and serum SCC-ag levels are associated with a poor prognosis. Therefore, targeting these pathways in combination with chemoradiation may improve survival in advanced-stage cervical cancer patients
Routine follow-up intervals in patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and free excision margins can safely be increased in the first two years after Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ)
OBJECTIVE: To assess the compliance of HSIL patients to the national Dutch routine follow-up protocol in the first 2 years after LLETZ and to determine if based on the status of excision margins, follow-up intervals could be modified. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in patients, referred because of an abnormal Pap smear between 1996 and 2004 and treated for HSIL with LLETZ. The Dutch national routine follow-up protocol orders a Pap smear after 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Follow-up results were completed by using PALGA, the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands. To assess compliance to the follow-up protocol, adequate follow-up was defined as three cervical smears taken after 6 (+/-3), 12 (+/-3) and 24 (+/-3) months, respectively. RESULTS: Compliance to the first 2 years follow-up protocol declined from 86.2% to 64.8% to 51.2% for first, second and third follow-up cervical smears, respectively. Patients with involved excision margins had a three times higher overall risk of developing a subsequent HSIL after LLETZ as compared to patients with free excision margins (HR: 3.2, 95% CI=1.3-7.9, p=0.01). Risk for diagnosing HSIL during the first 12 months of follow-up for patients with free excision margins was only 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance to the Dutch national routine follow-up protocol in HSIL patients after LLETZ is only moderate. For HSIL patients with free excision margins after LLETZ the first cytological follow-up interval can safely be increased to 12 months
The epidermal growth factor receptor pathway in relation to pelvic lymph node metastasis and survival in early-stage cervical cancer
The objective of this study is to correlate the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) components with clinical behavior of early-stage cervical cancer. Tissue samples of 336 consecutive Federation of International Gynecologists and Obstetricians stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients all treated primarily by radical surgery were collected. Clinicopathologic and follow-up data were prospectively obtained during standard treatment and follow-up. As representatives for the EGFR pathway, expression of EGFR, pEGFR, PTEN, pAKT, and pERK was assessed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. Positive immunostaining was observed for EGFR in 32.1%, for pEGFR in 21.0%, for PTEN in 38.3%, for pAKT in 5.3%, and for pERK in 4.3% of tumor samples. Positive EGFR immunostaining was associated with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (odds ratio [OR], 7.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.38-16.23, P < .001), negative pEGFR immunostaining with poor differentiation (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20-0.73, P = .004), and negative PTEN immunostaining with metastatic pelvic lymph nodes (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30-0.90, P = .019). In multivariate analysis, only pelvic lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio, 6.11; 95% CI, 3.46-10.77, P < .001) and poor differentiation (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.12-3.26, P = .018) were related to disease-specific survival. In early-stage cervical cancer, loss of PTEN expression is associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis, suggesting PTEN to be one of the tumor suppressor genes affecting pelvic lymph node metastasis. However, expression of EGFR pathway components does not appear to have prognostic impact in surgically treated early-stage cervical cancer
A four gene methylation marker panel as triage test in hr-HPV positive patients
Cervical neoplasia specific biomarkers, e.g. DNA methylation markers, with high sensitivity and specificity are urgently needed to improve current population-based screening on (pre)malignant cervical neoplasia. We aimed to identify new cervical neoplasia specific DNA methylation markers and to design and validate a methylation marker panel for triage of high risk (hr)-HPV positive patients. First, high through-put quantitative methylation specific PCRs (QMSP) on a novel OpenArray platform, representing 424 primers of 213 cancer specific methylated genes, were performed on frozen tissue samples from 84 cervical cancer patients and 106 normal cervices. Second, the top 20 discriminating methylation markers were validated by LightCycler(R) MSP on frozen tissue from 27 cervical cancer patients and 20 normal cervices and ROCs and test characteristics were assessed. Three new methylation markers were identified (JAM3, EPB41L3 and TERT), which were subsequently combined with C13ORF18 in our 4-gene methylation panel. In a third step, our methylation panel detected in cervical scrapings 94% (70/74) of cervical cancers, while in a fourth step 82% (32/39) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or higher (CIN3+) and 65% (44/68) CIN2+ were detected, with 21% positive cases for </=CIN1 (16/75). Finally, hypothetical scenario analysis showed that primary hr-HPV testing combined with our 4-gene methylation panel as a triage test resulted in a higher identification of CIN3 and cervical cancers and a higher percentage of correct referrals compared to hr-HPV testing in combination with conventional cytology. In conclusion, our 4-gene methylation panel might provide an alternative triage test after primary hr-HPV testing