The DNA Binding and Catalytic Domains of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 Cooperate in the Regulation of Chromatin Structure and Transcription▿

We explored the mechanisms of chromatin compaction and transcriptional regulation by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1), a nucleosome-binding protein with an NAD+-dependent enzymatic activity. By using atomic force microscopy and a complementary set of biochemical assays with reconstituted chromatin, we showed that PARP-1 promotes the localized compaction of chromatin into supranucleosomal structures in a manner independent of the amino-terminal tails of core histones. In addition, we defined the domains of PARP-1 required for nucleosome binding, chromatin compaction, and transcriptional repression. Our results indicate that the DNA binding domain (DBD) of PARP-1 is necessary and sufficient for binding to nucleosomes, yet the DBD alone is unable to promote chromatin compaction and only partially represses RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription in an in vitro assay with chromatin templates (∼50% of the repression observed with wild-type PARP-1). Furthermore, our results show that the catalytic domain of PARP-1, which does not bind nucleosomes on its own, cooperates with the DBD to promote chromatin compaction and efficient transcriptional repression in a manner independent of its enzymatic activity. Collectively, our results have revealed a novel function for the catalytic domain in chromatin compaction. In addition, they show that the DBD and catalytic domain cooperate to regulate chromatin structure and chromatin-dependent transcription, providing mechanistic insights into how these domains contribute to the chromatin-dependent functions of PARP-1

Comparative outcomes and toxicities for ruthenium-106 versus palladium-103 in the treatment of choroidal melanoma.

For the treatment of choroidal melanoma, palladium-103 (Pd) and ruthenium-106 (Ru) plaque brachytherapy shows reduced toxicity compared with the historical standard iodine-125. No report has directly compared the clinical outcomes between Pd and Ru, and the reasons for the selection of one over the other remain purely theoretical. Patients with choroidal melanoma with apical tumor height up to 5 mm were included. Patients from Emory University were treated with Pd between 1993 and 2012. Patients from Cleveland Clinic were treated with Ru between 2005 and 2010. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed. We compared post-treatment visual acuity (VA), toxicity, and oncologic outcomes. Pd patients (n=124) and Ru patients (n=42) had a median follow-up of 4.2 and 5.0 years, respectively. Radiation retinopathy-free survival was similar for both radioisotopes, but Ru had lower grades of retinopathy (P=0.006). Pd was associated with worse VA preservation (≥20/40) by year 3 (odds ratio: 3.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-14.31, P=0.048). Pd was associated with higher distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 0.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.38;