Non-operative management of abdominal stab wounds- an analysis of 186 patients

Background: The modern management of abdominal stab wounds remains controversial and subject to continued reappraisal. In the present study we reviewed patients with abdominal stab wounds to examine and validate a policy of selective non-operative management with serial physical abdominal examination in a busy urban trauma centre with a high incidence of penetrating trauma. Methods: Over a 12-month period (2005), the records of all patients with abdominal stab wounds were reviewed. Patients with abdominal stab wounds presenting with peritonitis, haemodynamic instability, organ evisceration and high spinal cord injury underwent emergency laparotomy. No local wound exploration, diagnostic peritoneal lavage or ultrasound was used. Haematuria in patients without an indication for emergency surgery was investigated with a contrasted computed tomography (CT) scan. Patients selected for non-operative management were admitted for serial clinical abdominal examination for 24 hours. Patients in whom abdominal findings were negative were given a test feed. If food was tolerated, they were discharged with an abdominal injury form. Results: One hundred and eighty-six patients with abdominal stab wounds were admitted. There were 171 (91.9%) males, with a mean age of 29.5 years. Seventy-four patients (39.8%) underwent emergency laparotomy. There were 5 negative laparotomies (6.8%). The remaining 112 patients (60.2%) were assigned for abdominal observation. One hundred (89.3%) of these patients were successfully managed non-operatively. The remaining 12 patients underwent delayed laparotomy, which was negative in 2 cases (16.7%). Non-operative management was successful in 53.8% of patients overall. The overall sensitivity and specificity of serial abdominal examination was 87.3% and 93.5%, respectively. Conclusion: Serial physical examination alone for asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with abdominal stab wounds enables a significant reduction in unnecessary laparotomies

Late video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracostomy tube reinsertion for retained hemothorax after penetrating trauma, a prospective randomized control study

BACKGROUND Early video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is the recommended treatment of choice for retained hemothorax (RH). A prospective single-center randomized control study was conducted to compare outcomes between VATS and thoracostomy tube (TT) reinsertion for patients with RH after penetrating trauma in a resource constrained unit. Our hypothesis was that patients with a RH receiving VATS instead of TT reinsertion would have a shorter hospital stay and lesser complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2014 to November 2019, stable patients with thoracic penetrating trauma complicated with retained hemothoraces were randomized to either VATS or TT reinsertion. The outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS) and complications. RESULTS Out of the 77 patients assessed for eligibility, 65 patients were randomized and 62 analyzed: 30 in the VATS arm and 32 in the TT reinsertion arm. Demographics and mechanisms of injury were comparable between the two arms. Length of hospital stay was: preprocedure: VATS 6.8 (+/-2.8) days and TT 6.6 (+/- 2.4) days (p = 0.932) and postprocedure: VATS 5.1 (+/-2.3) days, TT 7.1 (+/-6.3) days (p = 0.459), total LOS VATS 12 (+/- 3.9) days, and TT 14.4 (+/-7) days (p = 0.224). The TT arm had 15 complications compared to the VATS arm of four (p = 0.004). There were two additional procedures in the VATS arm and 10 in the TT arm (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION VATS proved to be the better treatment modality for RH with fewer complications and less need of additional procedures, while the LOS between the two groups was not statistically different

Penetrating renal injuries: an observational study of non-operative management and the impact of opening Gerota’s fascia

Background Non-operative management has become increasingly popular in the treatment of renal trauma. While data are robust in blunt mechanisms, the role of non-operative management in penetrating trauma is less clear. Additionally, there is a paucity of data comparing gunshot and stab wounds. Methods A retrospective review of patients admitted to a high-volume level 1 trauma center (Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town) with penetrating abdominal trauma was performed. Patients with renal injuries were identified and compared based on mechanism [gunshot (GSW) vs. stab] and management strategy (operative vs. non-operative). Primary outcomes of interest were mortality and failure of non-operative management. Secondary outcomes of interest were nephrectomy rates, Clavien-Dindo complication rate, hospital length of stay, and overall morbidity rate. Results A total of 150 patients with renal injuries were identified (82 GSW, 68 stab). Overall, 55.2% of patients required emergent/urgent laparotomy. GSWs were more likely to cause grade V injury and concurrent intra-abdominal injuries (p > 0.05). The success rate of non-operative management was 91.6% (89.9% GSW, 92.8% stab, p = 0.64). The absence of hematuria on point of care testing demonstrated a negative predictive value of 98.4% (95% CI 96.8–99.2%). All but 1 patient who failed non-operative management had associated intra-abdominal injuries requiring surgical intervention. Opening of Gerota’s fascia resulted in nephrectomy in 55.6% of cases. There were no statistically significant risk factors for failure of non-operative management identified on univariate logistic regression. Conclusions NOM of penetrating renal injuries can be safely and effectively instituted in both gunshot and stab wounds with a very low number of patients progressing to laparotomy. Most patients fail NOM for associated injuries. During laparotomy, the opening of Gerota’s fascia may lead to increased risk of nephrectomy. Ongoing study with larger populations is required to develop effective predictive models of patients who will fail NOM

Civilian extraperitoneal rectal gunshot injuries: Surgical management made simpler

Background: Rectal injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Controversy persists regarding routine presacral drainage, distal rectal washout (DRW), and primary repair of extraperitoneal rectal injuries. This retrospective review was performed to determine the outcome of rectal injuries in an urban trauma center with a high incidence of penetrating trauma where a non-aggressive surgical approach to these injuries is practiced. Methods: The records of all patients with a full-thickness penetrating rectal injury admitted to the Trauma Center at Groote Schuur Hospital over a 4-year period were reviewed. These were reviewed for demographics, injury mechanism and perioperative management, anatomical site of the rectal injury, associated intra-abdominal injuries and their management. Infectious complications and mortality were noted. Intraperitoneal rectal injuries were primarily repaired, with or without fecal diversion. Extraperitoneal rectal injuries were generally left untouched and a diverting colostomy was done. Presacral drainage and DRW were not routinely performed. Results: Ninety-two patients with 118 rectal injuries [intraperitoneal (7), extraperitoneal (59), combined (26)] were identified. Only two extraperitoneal rectal injuries were repaired. None had presacral drainage. Eighty-six sigmoid loop colostomies were done. Two (2.2%) fistula, one rectocutaneous, and one rectovesical, were recorded. There were nine (9.9%) infectious complications: surgical site infection (4), buttock abscess (1), buttock necrosis (1), pubic ramus osteitis (1), septic arthritis (2). No perirectal sepsis occurred. Conclusions Extraperitoneal rectal injuries due to low-velocity trauma can be safely managed by fecal diversion alone

Penetrating chest trauma

Patients with penetrating chest injuries can present from asymptomatic with just small wounds to pulseless with life-threatening injuries. Cardiac injuries with a pericardial tamponade, exsanguinating hemorrhage or thoraco-abdominal injuries are typical life-threatening conditions. Most of these patients die pre-hospital. However, some of these deaths are preventable. The goal is to reduce morbidity and mortality. The key to a successful management is an immediate standardized assessment and clear treatment algorithms. Time is of paramount essence. Chest X-ray, focused sonography, and computed tomography are standard diagnostic tools. Cardiac tamponade, large hemo-, or pneumothoraces must be ruled out. Up to 80% of all patients with penetrating chest injuries can be managed non-operative, however a tube thoracostomy (18%) or sternotomy/thoracotomy (3%) are necessary in selected cases. A stable patient with a small pneumothorax/hemothorax and no relevant additional findings can be assessed and treated non-operative. A large pneumo- or hemothorax must be drained with a chest tube. Patients with a low systolic blood pressure (<90 mmHg) despite 1 to 2 liters fluid usually need surgical evaluation and treatment. Typically, a hemodynamic unstable patient with a wound that involves the central “cardiac zone” requires a sternotomy. With wounds emerging more laterally, the trauma surgeon will perform an anterolateral thoracotomy. A patient in arrest needs to be evaluated for an emergency department thoracotomy (EDT)

Penetrating trauma to the kidney and Meckel’s Diverticulum in a patient with unilateral renal agenesis

Introduction: Emergency laparotomy for abdominal gunshot wounds is frequently performed in South Africa and remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The occurrence of congenital anomalies during surgery is an unexpected finding and presents a major challenge. Presentation of case: The successful management of a haemodynamically unstable 26-year-old man with unilateral renal agenesis, concomitant right renal and hepatic injuries, and a transected Meckel's Diverticulum following an abdominal gunshot wound is presented. Discussion: Intraoperative decision-making is difficult when congenital visceral anomalies form part of the injury complex in trauma. Basic principles of damage control surgery that include initial exploration, secondary resuscitation and definite operation must be adhered to. Repair of complex injuries are delayed until the definitive laparotomy. The presence of one congenital anomaly should alert the surgeon to the possibility of further anomalies. Conclusion: Although congenital visceral anomalies are spectacular findings at laparotomy, they should not distract the trauma surgeon. Adhering to damage control surgery principles and careful inspection of the peritoneal cavity for further abnormalities remain the mainstay of successful management

The Effect of Human-Immunodeficiency Virus Status on Outcomes in Penetrating Abdominal Trauma: An Interim Analysis

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine whether the outcomes of hemodynamically stable patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma differed as a result of their HIV status. METHODS This was an observational, prospective study from February 2016 to May 2017. All hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma requiring a laparotomy were included. The mechanism of injury, the HIV status, age, the penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI), and the revised trauma score (RTS) were entered into a binary logistic regression model. Outcome parameters were in-hospital death, morbidity, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), relaparotomy within 30 days, and length of stay longer than 30 days. RESULTS A total of 209 patients, 94% male, with a mean age of 29 ± 10 years were analysed. Twenty-eight patients (13%) were HIV positive. The two groups were comparable. Ten (4.8%) laparotomies were negative. There were two (0.96%) deaths, both in the HIV negative group. The complication rate was 34% (n = 72). Twenty-nine patients (14%) were admitted to the ICU. A higher PATI, older age, and a lower RTS were significant risk factors for ICU admission. After 30 days, 12 patients (5.7%) were still in hospital. Twenty-four patients (11%) underwent a second laparotomy. The PATI score was the single independent predictor for complications, relaparotomy, and hospital stay longer than 30 days. CONCLUSIONS Preliminary results reveal that HIV status does not influence outcomes in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma

Penetrating Pharyngoesophageal Injury: Practice Patterns in the Era of Nonoperative Management – A National Trauma Data Bank Review from 2007 to 2011

Introduction: Selective nonoperative management of neck injuries from penetrating mechanism has become an acceptable management strategy. We herein characterize current management strategies of cervical pharyngoesophageal injuries implemented by trauma surgeons in the United States. Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank datasets 2007–2011 were queried for penetrating pharyngeal and/or cervical esophageal injuries. Subjects surviving 24 hours or more were analyzed based on whether a surgical exploration was pursued and by gunshot versus stabbing mechanism. Results: In all, 1,256 patients were identified, representing 6% of all penetrating neck injuries during the study period. The majority (84%) were male, with a median age of 27 years. Injury severity was high (median score of 14). Compared to stabbing victims, gunshot patients were more likely to have associated cervical spine (24% vs. 1%, p < .01) and carotid artery injury (14% vs. 9%, p < .01). Neck exploration was performed in 49% of patients who survived at least 24 hours, with 90% occurring within the first day of admission. Of patients who underwent a delayed neck exploration, 35% required a tracheostomy and 41% required a feeding tube placement. The overall mortality was 4%. Nonoperative management was not associated with increased odds for death (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.55, p = .17). Conclusions: Nonoperative management of penetrating pharyngoesophageal injuries is commonly utilized with no effect on mortality