Anticonvulsant effects of mu (DAGO) and delta (DPDPE) enkephalins in rats

The effects of highly selective mu and delta opioid peptide agonists were determined in two rat models of experimentally-induced convulsions, the flurothyl threshold test and the maximal electroshock test. Intracerebroventricular injections of the mu selective enkephalin DAGO (0.3-2.2 nmol) resulted in a dose-related protection in both seizure models. Pretreatment with a low dose of naloxone (29 nmol) or the irreversible mu antagonist [beta]-FNA (21 nmol), but not the delta opioid antagonist ICI 154,129 (50 nmol), antagonized the anticonvulsant actions of DAGO. Intracerebroventricular injections of the delta selective enkephalin DPDPE (70-140 nmol) also resulted in seizure protection. These effects were selectively antagonized by the delta antagonist ICI 174,864 (2.8 nmol), but not by pretreatment with [beta]-FNA. Thus, using agonists and antagonists highly selective for mu and delta opioid receptors, anticonvulsant actions of enkephalin have been described against chemically- and electrically-induced convulsions in rats.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/27170/1/0000167.pd

Hindlimb paralytic effects of prodynorphin-derived peptides following spinal subarachnoid injection in rats

Dynorphin A-(1–17) acts through non-opioid mechanisms to produce dose-related neurological deficits following injection into the lumbar spinal subarachnoid space in rats. Hindlimb motor function was examined following subarachnoid injection of dynorphin A fragments and other opioid peptides derived from prodynorphin to establish: (1) which portion(s) of the dynorphin A molecule cause hindlimb motor dysfunction, and (2) whether these paralytic actions are shared by other opioids (dynorphin B, α-neo-endorphin, and β-neo-endorphin) derived from the same promolecule. To minimize the influence of enzymatic inactivation on relative bioactivities, peptides were coinjected with a combination of peptidase inhibitors previously shown to enhance the actions of dynorphin A fragments in vitro. Dynorphin A-(1–17) and -(2–17) produced dose-related neurological deficits with equal potencies and durations. Although without effect when injected alone, dynorphin A-(1–8), -(1–7) and -(3–8) caused transient motor dysfunction when co-injected with peptidase inhibitors. In contrast, dynorphin A-(1–6), -(1–5) and -(6–17) did not disrupt hindlimb motor function with or without peptidase inhibition. Dynorphin B, α-neo-endorphin also caused hindlimb dysfunction which was potentiated by peptidase inhibition. These deficits appeared to result from non-opioid actions of these three peptides, since they were not blocked by the opioid antagonist naloxone. Thus, the paralytic effects of dynorphin A: (1) result from non-opioid actions involving the 3–7 or 3–8 positions of the molecule, and (2) are shared by other prodynorphin-derived opioid peptides