28 research outputs found
The Yea and Nay of Newspaper Work for Women
What to do after college is the problem that confronts many girls at graduation time. The question, You\u27re going to teach? usually accompanies the customary graduation congratulations
Do They Practice What They Preach?
What\u27s this you\u27re saying? They don\u27t practice what they preach? Not so hasty in your judgment, please, for the defense is ready. The art of home making is not taught by mere theorists at Iowa State College
The Right Place for Everything
An elusive article known as the dust cloth gives us our idea for an article this month by suggesting that time-worn maxium, A place for everything and everything in its place
Short Cuts in Sewing
Do you remember the days when the sewing lady came to your house and sewed and sewed and then you pulled the bastings? And there were yards and yards and spools and spools of bastings, and mother made you save them all so carefully? Do you remember the hours spent on fine hand finishings and tiny seams, that never showed at all when your friends admired your new dress? But that was several years ago. The idea today is not only to save time, energy and basting thread, but to do everything in the easiest way possible
Campusing in Our Own Tea Room
They don\u27t say why because it\u27s a rule that doesn\u27t always hold true, as for example in the Campus Tea Room at Iowa State College.
Don\u27t the girls ever have bad luck? a college professor, a mere man, innocently asked after a delightful luncheon m the Campus Tea Room one day. I\u27ve been eating here for over a year and I\u27ve never been able to find fault.
The Campus Tea Room was the realization of a dream of Dean McKay. For several years it had been considered. Members of the Home Economics faculty wanted it because it would help to solve the problem of a warm noonday lunch. Home Economics students wanted it because of the opportunities for young women with experience in such lines of work
The Iowa Homemaker vol.1, no.11
Table of Contents
Do They Practice What They Preach? by Helen Easter, page 1
The Well Dressed Woman Considers Art Principles by Anne Prang, page 2
Tell Me a Story Mother by Mildred Elder, page 3
The House That Was Built to Fit by Beth Crowley, page 4
A Few Fine Points in Meal Planning by Beth Bailey, page 5
Choosing the Right Picture for the Right Place by Joanna Hansen, page 6
Wherein Refinishing Makes Refurnishing Easy by Glenna Hesse, page 7
What Kind of Kitchen Surfaces Have You? By Glenna Hesse, page 1
Self-Harm in Eating Disorders (SHINE):a mixed-methods exploratory study
Introduction Self-harm is highly prevalent among young people with eating disorders. However, why a young person may develop and continue to experience both an eating disorder and self-harm is unclear. This study will investigate the frequency, intensity, duration, function, context and processes of self-harm among people aged 16–25 diagnosed with an eating disorder. It will explore participants’ perspectives on the genesis and functions of both their self-harm and eating disorder, as well as their support needs. The study was designed with the input of members of a Young Persons’ Advisory Group, who will be key to study delivery and dissemination.Methods and analysis This exploratory study has a sequential mixed-methods explanatory design. Between 70 and 100 young people aged 16–25 with both an eating disorder diagnosis and self-harm thoughts and/or behaviours will be recruited from three NHS Eating Disorder outpatient services in England. Phase 1: a 14-day (six prompts per day) ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of participants’ feelings, thoughts, motivations, behaviours and experiences of self-harm. Phase 2: 20–30 participants from phase 1 will be reapproached to take part in an in-depth qualitative interview on the psychological, emotional and social factors that underlie their self-harm and eating disorder as well as their support needs. EMA data from phase 1 will be analysed using descriptive and multilevel statistics. Qualitative interview data from phase 2 will be analysed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Results from both phases will be integrated using a mixed-methods matrix, with each participant’s data from both phases compared alongside comparative analysis of the datasets as a whole.Ethics and dissemination The study gained ethical approval from the NHS HRA West Midlands–Black Country Research Ethics Committee (number: 296032). We anticipate disseminating findings to clinical, academic and lived experience audiences, at academic conferences, through peer-reviewed articles, and through various public engagement activities (eg, infographics, podcasts)
The Iowa Homemaker vol.1, no.7
Table of Contents
The Yea and Nay of Newspaper Work for Women by Helen Easter, page 1
Facts About the Feeding of Young Children by Belle Lowe, page 2
An Inventory of Skill for the Honest Homewife by Elizabeth Storm, page 3
Who Waits on Your Table? by Beth Bailey, page 4
My First Flight in the Pursuit of Beauty by Eda Lord Murphy, page 4
A New Cure for the “Run-Down” Housewife by Carrie Plunkett, page 5
A Pattern in Hot Lunch Service for Rural Schools by Grace McIlrath, page 6
The Reason for the Addled Egg by C. H. Plunkett, page 7
Short Cuts in Sewing by Helen Easter, page 1
The Iowa Homemaker vol.1, no.2
Table of Contents
The Unbidden Guest - Malnutrition by Gladys Dodge, page 1
Wedded at Sunset in June by Clara Jordon, page 2
A Child’s Book Shelf by Lillian Shaben, page 3
Whole Wheat Bread for Health by Florence E. Busse, page 4
Beads, the Latest Accessory to Dress by Johanna M. Hansen, page 5
Putting Organdies to the Test by Vivian Moe and Mildred Elder, page 6
The Right Place for Everything by Helen Easter, page 7
Before Leaving Home for the Summer by Elizabeth Storm, page 7
Safeguarding Your Pocket Book by Marjorie Miller, page
Conceptual framework on barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care and treatment for women: the MATRIx evidence synthesis
Background: Perinatal mental health difficulties can occur during pregnancy or after birth and mental illness is a leading cause of maternal death. It is therefore important to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing and accessing perinatal mental health care.
Objectives: Our research objective was to develop a conceptual framework of barriers and facilitators to perinatal mental health care (defined as identification, assessment, care and treatment) to inform perinatal mental health services.
Methods: Two systematic reviews were conducted to synthesise the evidence on: Review 1 barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care; and Review 2 barriers to women accessing perinatal mental health care. Results were used to develop a conceptual framework which was then refined through consultations with stakeholders.
Data sources: Pre-planned searches were conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo and CINAHL. Review 2 also included Scopus and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Review methods: In Review 1, studies were included if they examined barriers or facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care. In Review 2, systematic reviews were included if they examined barriers and facilitators to women seeking help, accessing help and engaging in perinatal mental health care; and they used systematic search strategies. Only qualitative papers were identified from the searches. Results were analysed using thematic synthesis and themes were mapped on to a theoretically informed multi-level model then grouped to reflect different stages of the care pathway.
Results: Review 1 included 46 studies. Most were carried out in higher income countries and evaluated as good quality with low risk of bias. Review 2 included 32 systematic reviews. Most were carried out in higher income countries and evaluated as having low confidence in the results.
Barriers and facilitators to perinatal mental health care were identified at seven levels: Individual (e.g. beliefs about mental illness); Health professional (e.g. confidence addressing perinatal mental illness); Interpersonal (e.g. relationship between women and health professionals); Organisational (e.g. continuity of carer); Commissioner (e.g. referral pathways); Political (e.g. women’s economic status); and Societal (e.g. stigma). These factors impacted on perinatal mental health care at different stages of the care pathway.
Results from reviews were synthesised to develop two MATRIx conceptual frameworks of the (1) barriers and (2) facilitators to perinatal mental health care. These provide pictorial representations of 66 barriers and 39 facilitators that intersect across the care pathway and at different levels.
Limitations: In Review 1 only 10% of abstracts were double screened and 10% of included papers methodologically appraised by two reviewers. The majority of reviews included in Review 2 were evaluated as having low (n = 14) or critically low (n = 5) confidence in their results. Both reviews only included papers published in academic journals and written in English.
Conclusions: The MATRIx frameworks highlight the complex interplay of individual and system level factors across different stages of the care pathway that influence women accessing perinatal mental health care and effective implementation of perinatal mental health services.
Recommendations for health policy and practice:
These include using the conceptual frameworks to inform comprehensive, strategic and evidence-based approaches to perinatal mental health care; ensuring care is easy to access and flexible; providing culturally sensitive care; adequate funding of services; and quality training for health professionals with protected time to do it.
Future work: Further research is needed to examine access to perinatal mental health care for specific groups, such as fathers, immigrants or those in lower income countries.
Trial registration: This trial is registered as PROSPERO: (R1) CRD42019142854; (R2) CRD42020193107.
Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR 128068) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 2. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information