Research Note: Using effectiveness studies for prescribing research, Part 1

The process of evaluating pharmaceuticals has become highly conceptualized in contrast to the lack of formal rules for assessing effects of interventions on practice. We argue that clinical audit is a key factor prior to instigating an intervention and that randomized controlled evaluations are preferable. We discuss the need for small-scale experiments prior to full trials to validate the underlying concept of an intervention with the recognition that different approaches may be necessary. This includes open rather than blind assessments and greater emphasis on qualitative issues during development of interventions followed by quantitative appraisal of their impact

Research Note: Using effectiveness studies for prescribing research, Part 2

Trials that consider the effects of interventions on prescribing behaviour amongst clinicians often have complex design implications resulting in data that has inherent hierarchical structure. It follows that both experimental design and analysis plans must account for this structure and thus results should be considered in terms of clinician behaviour rather than individual patient response. We describe this change in perspective and the necessity for using statistical techniques that allow incorporation of potential confounding effects. We also discuss the appropriateness of some specific outcomes in relation to these trials

Highlighting the need for better patient care in stable angina: results of the international Angina Treatment Patterns (ATP) Survey in 7074 patients.

Background. Stable angina is a growing problem worldwide. Diagnostic methods and treatment regimens are established but data on actual practice are sparse and pre-date current guidance.Objectives. To compare diagnosis and treatment information with guideline recommendations, and to assess impact on quality of life.Methods. This international epidemiological survey recruited patients through primary and secondary care clinicians from China, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Portugal, Russia and Slovak Republic. Participants experienced at least one episode of stable angina within the previous four weeks. Outcomes included use of diagnostic techniques, pharmacological treatments, surgical intervention, secondary prevention and quality of life.Results. The study included 7074 patients, average age 63.3 (sd 10.3). Diagnosis of angina was most frequently as a result of chest pains (87.4%) with confirmaton by resting ECG in only 54.9%. Advice regarding risk factors was frequently given although secondary prevention was often ineffective with 41% of treated hypertensives lacking effective control. 97% of patients were taking at least one of the primary therapies for stable angina recommended by the guidelines with rates of individual therapies varying greatly across countries. Quality of life was lowest in countries with low rates of surgical intervention and poor observance of guidelines on pharmaceutical therapy.Conclusion. Results show that the management of patients with stable angina does not meet recommended standards, although the appropriateness of these guidelines in poorer countries needs further investigation. Overall, the survey indicates that improved medical care and risk factor management would enhance prognosis and improve quality of life