19 research outputs found
Review of Dental Impression Materials
Major advances in impression materials and their application have occurred during the last decade, with greater emphasis being placed on rubber impression materials than on dental compound, zinc oxide-eugenol, and agar and alginate. Of particular interest has been the effect of disinfection solutions on the qualities of impressions and the biocompatibility of impression materials. The principal advance in hydrocolloids has been the introduction of the agar/alginate impression technique, which has simplified the procedure and improved the quality of gypsum dies compared with those prepared in alginate impressions. The tear strength of some alginates has been improved, and some have been formulated so that the powder is dustless, thus reducing the health hazard as a result of patient inhalation of dust during the dispensing process. Polyether and silicone impression materials have been modified so that the working time, viscosity, and flexibility of the polyethers have been improved and, with the introduction of addition silicones, their accuracy has become exceptional. Although the early addition silicones liberated hydrogen after setting, thus delaying the pouring of models and dies, most addition silicones have been improved so that no hydrogen is released and dies can be poured immediately. The introduction of automatic mixing systems for addition silicones has simplified their manipulation, has reduced the number of voids in impressions, and has reduced the amount of material wasted. The incorporation of surfactants into addition silicones has made them hydrophilic, with wetting properties similar to those of polyethers, and has made pouring bubble-free gypsum dies easier. This review is confined to published and unpublished information of the past decade. It will also suggest trends that should be anticipated in the near future based on this information. The review will not present information developed before 1975, which is available in several textbooks on dental materials by Craig (1985a), Phillips (1982), and Williams and Cunningham (1979).Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66604/2/10.1177_08959374880020012001.pd
Variation in the dispersions of powder liquid ratios in hand-mix glass ionomers
BACKGROUND:
The Powder/Liquid Ratio (PLR) influence, and the literature regarding the handling and physical properties of Glass Ionomer
restorative materials (GIC) were investigated.
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of the study was to compare the PLR variability and magnitude in hand-mix GICs, as dispensed for clinical use. From
the recorded individual powder and liquid weights, additional comparisons could be made by pairing the various “extreme” outer
observations in relation to the manufacturer’s PLR.
STUDY DESIGN:
The materials assessed were Ketac Universal Hand-mix (KUH), Riva Self Cure Hand-mix (RSCH) and Fuji IX GP Hand-mix
(FIXH). Twenty scoops of powder were paired with twenty drops of liquid, as would be the case in the clinical scenario. Statistical
analysis was completed with the Kruskal Wallis H test, Intraclass Correlation (ICC) and straight line regressions with One-way
ANOVA and the post-hoc Tukey HSD Test (p<0.05 was considered significant).
RESULTS:
The powder and liquid observations indicate a lack of consistency in both the powder and liquid dispersions. The volume remained
“one drop” but the weights were much lower than the manufacturer’s recommended drop weight for some observations, due to air in
the liquid drop. The Kruskal-Wallis H test indicated significant differences (p=0.0001) between the three materials for the paired
PLRs. The One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey HSD Test were used to compare the recommended PLR to the results and the
significant differences (p<0.01).
CONCLUSION:
The recommended manufacturers’ powder and liquid weights were KUH 0.150/0.05g; RSC 0.165/0.035; FIXH 0.18/0.05,
respectively. KUH, FIXH and RSCH liquid had powder and liquid dispersions above the manufacturer’s recommendations. FIXH
had the most paired PLR observations within the ±10% range followed by KUH. Extreme powder and liquid combinations could
occur in the clinical scenario and these combinations were considered
Materials Science Measurement of of Amalgam Mixes to Condensation
A method was designed to evaluate the resistance of amalgam mixes to condensation forces. For the purpose of classification with respect to the plasticity of amalgam, the optimum test conditon was to apply 40 or 50 lb of static load at 30 sec after trituration.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67745/2/10.1177_00220345830620081701.pd