Elevation in Cell Cycle and Protein Metabolism Gene Transcription in Inactive Colonic Tissue From Icelandic Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND: A combination of genetic and environmental factors is thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC). In Iceland, the incidence of UC is one of the highest in the world. The aim of this study was to characterize patients with UC and identify potential germline mutations and pathways that could be associated with UC in this population. METHODS: Exome sequencing and genome-wide microarray analysis on macroscopically noninflamed colonic mucosa from patients and controls were performed. Exome sequence data were examined for very rare or novel mutations that were over-represented in the UC cohort. Combined matching of variant analysis and downstream influence on transcriptomic expression in the rectum were analyzed. RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred thirty-eight genes were differentially expressed in rectal tissue from UC patients and identified an upregulation in genes associated with cell cycle control and protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Two missense mutations in thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) with a minor allele frequency of 0.22 in the UC patients compared with a reported 0.062 in the Icelandic population were identified. A predicted damaging mutation in the gene SLC26A3 is potentially associated with increased expression of DUOX2 and DUOXA2 in rectal tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic mucosa of UC patients demonstrates evidence of an elevation in genes involving cell proliferation and processing of proteins within the ER. Exome sequencing identified a possible increased prevalence of 2 damaging TPMT variants within the UC population, suggesting screening the UC population before initiation of thiopurine analogue therapy to avoid toxicity associated with these mutations

Diagnostic and prognostic assessment of suspected drug‐induced liver injury in clinical practice

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a challenging liver disorder because it can present with a range of phenotypes, mimicking almost every other hepatic disease, and lacks specific biomarkers for its diagnosis. Hence, a confident DILI diagnosis is seldom possible as it relies on the precise establishment of a temporal sequence between the exposure to a given prescription drug or sometimes hidden herbal product/over the counter medication as well as the exclusion of other aetiologies of liver disease. However, an accurate diagnosis is of most importance, as prompt withdrawal of the causative agent is essential in DILI management. Indeed, DILI can be severe and even fatal or in a fraction of cases evolve to chronic damage, but specific biomarkers for predicting mortality/liver transplantation or a chronic outcome in the very early phases of DILI are not yet available. In this article, we discuss the best diagnostic and prognostic approach of a DILI suspicion by judiciously choosing and interpreting the standard tests currently used in clinical practice