Respiration-averaged CT versus standard CT attenuation maps for correction of the 18F-NaF uptake in hybrid PET/CT

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of respiratory-averaged computed tomography attenuation correction (RACTAC) compared to standard single-phase computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) map, on the quantitative measures of coronary atherosclerotic lesions of (18)F-sodium fluoride ((18)F-NaF) uptake in hybrid positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT). METHODS: This study comprised 23 patients who underwent (18)F-NaF coronary PET in a hybrid PET/CT system. All patients had a standard single-phase CTAC obtained during free-breathing and a 4D cine-CT scan. From the cine-CT acquisition, RACTAC maps were obtained by averaging all images acquired over 5 seconds. PET reconstructions using either CTAC or RACTAC were compared. The quantitative impact of employing RACTAC was assessed using maximum target-to-background (TBR(MAX)) and coronary microcalcification activity (CMA). Statistical differences were analyzed using reproducibility coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: In 23 patients, we evaluated 34 coronary lesions using CTAC and RACTAC reconstructions. There was good agreement between CTAC and RACTAC for TBR(MAX) (median [Interquartile range]): CTAC= 1.65[1.23–2.38], RACTAC= 1.63[1.23–2.33], p=0.55), with coefficient of reproducibility of 0.18, and CMA: CTAC= 0.10 [0–1.0], RACTAC= 0.15[0–1.03], p=0.55 with coefficient of reproducibility of 0.17 CONCLUSION: Respiratory-averaged and standard single-phase attenuation correction maps provide similar and reproducible methods of quantifying coronary (18)F-NaF uptake on PET/CT