Clinical prospective study of biochemical markers and evoked potentials for identifying adverse neurological outcome after thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

Background. Neurological deficit after repair of a thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAA/TAAA) remains a devastating complication. The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical value of biochemical markers [S-100B, neurone-specific enolase (NSE) and lactate dehydrogenase (LD)], evoked potentials and their combinations for identifying adverse neurological outcome after TAA/TAAA surgery. Methods. From 69 patients, cerebrospinal fluid and blood samples for biochemical analysis were drawn after the induction of anaesthesia, during the cross-clamp period, 5 min, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 19 h, respectively, after reperfusion. In addition, continuous perioperative recording of motor-evoked potentials after transcranial electrical stimulation (tcMEP) and somatosensory-evoked potentials was carried out. Furthermore, neurological examinations were performed. Results. In patients with a defined decrease in lower extremity tcMEP during the cross-clamp period, we found that combinations of the serum concentrations of S-100B and tcMEP ratios at 4, 6, and 8 h after reperfusion had a positive and negative predictive value of 100% in predicting adverse neurological outcome after TAA/TAAA surgery. Furthermore, combinations of the serum concentrations of S-100B and NSE or LD at 19 h after reperfusion had both a positive and negative predictive value of 100% in identifying patients with adverse outcome after TAA/TAAA repair. Conclusions. TcMEP monitoring during TAA/TAAA surgery seems to be an effective but not completely sufficient guide in our protective multi-modality strategy. Combinations of the serum concentrations of S-100B and tcMEP ratios during the early reperfusion period might be associated with adverse neurological complications. Furthermore, biochemical markers could detect central nervous system injury on the first postoperative day and may have prognostic value

Pre-analytical issues in the haemostasis laboratory: guidance for the clinical laboratories

Ensuring quality has become a daily requirement in laboratories. In haemostasis, even more than in other disciplines of biology, quality is determined by a pre-analytical step that encompasses all procedures, starting with the formulation of the medical question, and includes patient preparation, sample collection, handling,transportation, processing, and storage until time of analysis. This step, based on a variety of manual activities, is the most vulnerable part of the total testing process and is a major component of the reliability and validity of results in haemostasis and constitutes the most important source of erroneous or un-interpretable results. Pre-analytical errors may occur throughout the testing process and arise from unsuitable, inappropriate or wrongly handled procedures. Problems may arise during the collection of blood specimens such as misidentification of the sample, use of inadequate devices or needles, incorrect order of draw, prolonged tourniquet placing, unsuccessful attempts to locate the vein, incorrect use of additive tubes, collection of unsuitable samples for quality or quantity, inappropriate mixing of a sample, etc. Some factors can alter the result of a sample constituent after collection during transportation, preparation and storage. Laboratory errors can often have serious adverse consequences. Lack of standardized procedures for sample collection accounts for most of the errors encountered within the total testing process. They can also have clinical consequences as well as a significant impact on patient care, especially those related to specialized tests as these are often considered as “diagnostic”. Controlling pre-analytical variables is critical since this has a direct influence on the quality of results and on their clinical reliability. The accurate standardization of the pre-analytical phase is of pivotal importance for achieving reliable results of coagulation tests and should reduce the side effects of the influence factors. This review is a summary of the most important recommendations regarding the importance of pre-analytical factors for coagulation testing and should be a tool to increase awareness about the importance of pre-analytical factors for coagulation testing