25 research outputs found
ΠΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ²ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΡΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ (ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡ)
The article deals with the comparative analysis of cognitive-discourse factors of the mediated interlingual communication connected with national-cultural specification of the language worldview.Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ-Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΡΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Ρ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΌΠΈΡΠ°
SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE PERCEPTION, COMPREHENSION, AND PRODUCTION THROUGH THE PRISM OF INTERTEXTUALITY AND POLY-CULTURAL SPACE OF TRANSLATION (COGNITIVE APPROACH IN TRANSLATION)
Intensified by poly-cultural space of translation, specific nature of scientific discourse, which increasingly invokes the phenomenon of intertextuality, precondition special relevance of cognitive text forming mechanisms aimed at ensuring scientific text perception and comprehension in what concerns semiotic and functional potential thereof. The aim of this study is to consider the intercorrelations between cognitive and linguistic structures of the medical concept βBoNTA naΓ―ve injections β within scientific information processing in the mediated communication.Methods of semantic and conceptual analyses are used in this research, along with translation and native speaker's questionnaire methods. Ph.D. students (n 89) of RUDN- University from different countries learning the English, the Spanish, and the Russian languages as a second foreign language are involved in the study.We conclude that particular significance for translation process as a speech act is acquired by cognitive aspects of sense interaction based on presuppositions and implications rooted in background knowledge when structuring and shaping up a part of professional experience that encode frames of reference to the cognitive perception of both reality and the ways of its conceptualization in scientific communication in the source and target languages.This article has practical value for comparative study of languages, cognitive semantics, linguistics, language and translation teaching
Cultural concepts: social context and semantic features
Investigation of dynamics of language in use, representing an important tendency that contributes to forming of modern predominant approach in linguistic science, meets the cherished objective of solving a wide range of issues arising from the functioning of language, which can be efficiently viewed in the context of cognitive approach. In the theoretical framework of the cognitive paradigm of linguistic researches the cognitive approach in translation, as we opine, is to be profiled through the prism of intertextuality and policultural spaceβs cognitive peculiarities, subjecting the mechanism of discourse perception, comprehension and production to the specificities conditioned, among others, by social, cultural and pragmatic factors of bilingual communication and applying the criteria of the speech act efficiency, supplementing the latter by linguistic and extralinguistic determinants of translation.
Cultural concepts in Russian, Spanish and English languages constitute the object of this article. We make special reference to pragmatic features of their functioning as communicative (linguistic and cognitive) means within a dynamic interaction between participants, participantsβ conceptual systems and cultures.
We highlight the role of such skills as functional generalization and presenting of structures of knowledge by means of categorization and conceptualization that best accord with adequate conveyance of peculiarities of social and cultural experiences of a given language community in unrelated languages.
The aim of this article is to compare cognitive and discursive characteristic features of Russian, Spanish and English concepts, to analyze relevant specificities of their functioning in mediated discourse in order to elaborate a strategy designed to preserve implicatures of the source text drawing distinction between specific national and universal features of presuppositions in human interaction while determining the semantic invariant viewed through the prism of translation norm of adequacy and equivalence and the phenomenon of intertextuality.
In present article the method of semantic analysis and comparative analysis are used, along with translation method.
We come to conclusion that cultural concepts considered per se as universal ways of conceptualizing reality play the role of pragmatic sense markers with additional cognitive effects in mediated discourse that are modelling cognitive processing of conceptual information explicitly or implicitly encoded within the given context of cross-cultural communication.
The practical value of this article can be of significant relevance when investigating cognitive and functional aspects of discourse studies in modern linguistics, translation theory, cross-cultural communication, lexicographic studies, and language teaching
Cognitive dynamics of sense generation and verbalization processes in translation
A new insight into comprehensive research of rules and cognitive mechanisms of sense interaction within the edges of ongoing cross-cultural mediated communication has been provided by cognitive approach in modern linguistics and translation theory. Specific features and peculiarities within conceptual structuring of lexical units meaning in mediated discourse are of particular interest for investigation in the light of translation norm of adequacy and equivalence, along with speech act efficiency criteria. Our aim is to consider the Spanish concept Β«hecho diferencialΒ» (e.g. catalΓ‘n, vasco) and functioning thereof in Spanish media texts, along with differences in transferring semantic, encyclopedic, and pragmatic knowledge qualities within translation through the prism of cognitive semantics and translation theory postulates. Native speakers questionnaire method involving the RUDN-university Ph.D. students (103 n) from different countries, along with translation and semantic analysis methods are applied in this study. We conclude that modelling of cognitive transparency in perception and comprehension of such kind of concepts reflects dialectical essence of cognitive processes within translation for it facilitates adequacy in linguistic presenting of knowledge and restoration of the referential situation presuppositions of the source language, pragmatic context thereof, and cognitive space in target language as well. The article has practical value for researches in linguistics, translation and ?rosscultural communication
ΠΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅
The review presents the data on the prevalence of celiac disease in various world regions. The numbers of patients with celiac disease continues to rise every year. According to some authors, this is to be related not only to improvement in diagnosis, but to other extrinsic factors, as well, that require additional studies. In the 1980s the prevalence of this disease was 1.05%, and by the beginning of 2000s, it amounted to 1.99%. In particular, from 1993 to 2002 in Britain its incidence increased from 6 to 13.3 per 100,000. Both raised awareness of doctors and conduction of epidemiological studies play aΒ decisive role in the improvement of the diagnosis of celiac disease. The information cumulated up to now makes it possible to conclude that the highest diagnostic rates of celiac disease can be found in the risk groups. They include 1st and 2nd degree relatives of patients with celiac disease, patients with autoimmune disorders (typeΒ 1 diabetes mellitus, autoimmune thyroiditis); those with clinical signs of an intestinal disorder, such as chronic diarrhea, as well as patients with anemia, osteoporosis and high transaminase levels of unknown origin. According to the Finnish epidemiological study, the prevalence of celiac disease, depending on the risk group, may vary from 6.6 to 16.3%. The guidelines by the American College of Gastroenterology, British Society of Gastroenterology, North-American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, and the Russian Consensus on Diagnosis and Treatment of Celiac Disease in Adults and Children all recommend thorough examination of patients from the risk groups. Active diagnosis of celiac disease (screening) has been recognized as one of the approaches to primary prevention to autoimmune disorders and cancer.Π ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΒ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΈ Π²Β ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ
ΠΌΠΈΡΠ°. ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ°Π΅Ρ ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΒ ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠΌ Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ. ΠΠΎ ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½ΠΎ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΒ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΒ Ρ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²Β 80-Ρ
Π³ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ»Π° 1,05%, ΡΠΎ Π²Β Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π΅ 2000-Ρ
Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ³ 1,99%. ΠΒ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π²Β ΠΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π²Β ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ ΡΒ 1993 ΠΏΠΎ 2002Β Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΎΡΠ»Π° ΡΒ 6 Π΄ΠΎ 13,3 Π½Π° 100Β ΡΡΡ. Π Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»Ρ Π²Β ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΎΒ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΒ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΒ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°ΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΠ° Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π²Β Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ°Ρ
ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ°, ΠΊΒ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΌ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΒ Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ; Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΒ Π°ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ (ΡΠ°Ρ
Π°ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π±Π΅Ρ 1-Π³ΠΎΒ ΡΠΈΠΏΠ°, Π°ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΎΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡ); Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΒ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Β β Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, Π°Β ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΒ Π°Π½Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΌ; Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΒ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π·Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²Β Π€ΠΈΠ½Π»ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΈ Π²Β Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° Π²Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΡ 6,6 Π΄ΠΎ 16,3%. Π’ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ· Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π³Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ², ΠΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π³Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ², Π‘Π΅Π²Π΅ΡΠΎΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΏΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π³Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈΒ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΈ Π²Π·ΡΠΎΡΠ»ΡΡ
ΠΈΒ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ. ΠΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° (ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½Π³) ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Π½Π° ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ· ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π°ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΒ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ
The Mosaic of Ecological Discourse in the Light of Translation Studies and Cognition
Built around complex doctrinal approaches to interactions among human and natural systems and characterized by increasing dynamism, ecological scientific discourse tends to set sights on the interdisciplinarity facet of researches and has its own relevant specificities of language use that are to be paid special attention in what regards science education. In the context of cross-border scientific communication and polylogue as to environmental concerns and agenda suffused by emanation of new concepts, neologisms, and innovative theories, particular relevance is acquired by potential symmetry of presuppositional conditions, including linguistic, cultural, and scientific competencies of communicants that determine the common background of knowledge, essential for ensuring that the information is adequately sent and received, as well as the spatio-temporal limits of a given discourse, in terms of analysis, at which this article is aimed, within the frames of comparison of specificities that characterize the way in which certain parts of knowledge or human experience is reflected in language throughout the process of mediated cross-cultural cross-linguistic scientific communication, along with efficiency and scope of translator's choice and creativity. The methods of semantic and comparative analyses, as well as the method of translation, and the questionnaire method are used in this study. Ph.D. students of RUDN-university (n 78) from different countries with different mother-tongue backgrounds learning academic writing in the English and the Spanish languages participated in the questionnaire. By way of conclusion, cognitive approach to semiotic and functional potential of ecological discourse, to the structures of knowledge and conventional ways of objectivization thereof within cognitive environment, to linking or relating knowledge of field data with language competence enhance motivation of Ph.D. students to participate in cross-linguistic cross-cultural scientific communication. The practical value of this study can be relevant for language teaching, language acquisition, translation studies, intercultural communication and discourse researches
Modern Scientific Communication and its Efficacy through the Prism of Science Education: Dialectic Interaction between Cognition and Discourse Phenomena
In recent decades, in the light of globalization processes particular role attributed to scientific articles
as one of the most efficient means of cross-cultural cross-linguistic scientific communication
dynamizing creation of new concepts, categories, theories, and scientific values, including those
based on interdisciplinarity, has reinforced complex issues concerning equivalence of thesauruses of
communication participants and structuring of the information flow, which are of special interest in
what regards science education. Intensified multidimensional dialogue of cultures, scientific schools,
and fields of knowledge inevitable requires flexible tools and instruments designed to standardize and
structuralize written scientific discourse, inter alia, standardized connectors and compositional
formulas or recurrent lexical and grammar constructions to be adequately perceived and efficiently
applied by Ph.D. students. Analyzing the instruments and tools referred to above, what represents the
aim of this article, we apply the following methods: comparative analysis, the method of translation
and the questionnaire method which engaged Ph.D. students of RUDN-university (n-95) from different
countries learning academic writing in different scientific fields where the English and the Spanish
languages are used as a second foreign language by learners with different mother-tongue
backgrounds. We conclude that, while providing a map for researchersβ creativity or discretion in
interpretation and linguistic representation of accumulated research data, recurrent standard
constructions, which form part of the structure of text mechanism that reflects universal schemes of
the processes of perception, comprehension, and representation of scientific phenomena and
processes in their integrity and dynamics, enable the forming of Ph.D. studentsβ own theoretical
projections, models and approaches, as well as focusing on polylogue with other scholars in the
context of scientific communication. This article is of practical value for cross-linguistic studies,
language and translation teaching, foreign language acquisition, translation and interpretation studies
Language and Translation: Interdisciplinary Effort and Synergetic Effect
Discourse oriented approach to language in translation acquires clear interdisciplinary concern that can be addressed from different focuses: cognitive science, linguistics, sociolinguistics, cognitive linguistics, pragmatics, artificial intelligence, etc. that have marked synergetic effect for mediated scientific communication. Complex interrelated problems inherent to cognitive and linguistic structuring and processing of information within mediated communication imply the need for efficient strategies of neutralization of differences arising between contacting languages, cultures, and scientific traditions viewed through the prism of communicative equivalence, inter alia, in different fields of knowledge. This article is aimed at analyzing specificities intrinsic to the interrelation between cognition, language and communication that are crucial for sign's real meaning flexibility within cognitive processing and linguistic presenting of knowledge within pragmatic presuppositions and implications, discourse inferencing encumbered by multifaceted phenomena of interdisciplinarity and translation. The methods of comparative and semantic analysis, as well as the method of translation and the questionnaire method find application in this research. The questionary engaged Ph.D. students from RUDN-university (n=112) from different countries, such as Russia, Albania, Algeria, China, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Jordan, Kirghizia, Vietnam, etc. We come to the conclusion that the role of an efficient tool for resolving a wide scope of problems concerning the functioning of language with respect to different areas of human knowledge in the context of mediated communication is acquired by the interdisciplinary effort that facilitates effectiveness of sense generation, perception, and interpretation within translator's activity aimed at achieving adequacy and equivalence when modelling cognitive space that ensures possibilities for the reconstruction of communication presuppositions and reinforces functional and semiotic potential of the mediated discourse in the target language. The article is of practical value for linguistics, theory and practice of translation, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse studies