9 research outputs found

    НаслСдствСнныС спастичСскиС ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΈ

    Get PDF
    Hereditary spastic paraplegias represent a group of hereditary neurodegenerative disorders predominantly affecting corticospinal tracts which manifest with prominent spasticity and reduced power in the muscles of the lower limbs. According to clinical signs hereditary spastic paraplegias are divided into uncomplicated (classic) and complicated forms, according to the nature of inheritance – into autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive and X-linked. Mechanisms of the development of hereditary spastic paraplegias depend on the form and could be associated with misfolding of the proteins in endoplasmatic reticulum, mitochondrial dysfunction, changes in the cholesterol metabolism etc. Diagnosis is made after exclusion of other disorders of the central nervous system and could be confirmed by molecular genetic methods. Treatment of hereditary spastic paraplegias is symptomatic.НаслСдствСнныС спастичСскиС ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΈ – Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ° Π½Π΅ΠΉΡ€ΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ с прСимущСствСнным ΠΏΠΎΡ€Π°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΏΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π°, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡΠ²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π²Ρ‹Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΠ°ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ ΠΈ сниТСниСм силы Π² ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΡ†Π°Ρ… Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ½ΠΈΡ… конСчностСй. По клиничСским проявлСниям Π²Ρ‹Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ нСослоТнСнныС (классичСскиС) ΠΈ ослоТнСнныС Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡ‹, ΠΏΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΡƒ наслСдования – аутосомно-Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π½Ρ‚Π½Ρ‹Π΅, аутосомно-рСцСссивныС ΠΈ Π₯-сцСплСнныС. ΠœΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ‹ развития наслСдствСнных спастичСских ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΉ зависят ΠΎΡ‚ Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡ‹ заболСвания ΠΈ связаны с мисфолдингом Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ² Π² эндоплазматичСском Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΊΡƒΠ»ΡƒΠΌΠ΅, ΠΌΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ…ΠΎΠ½Π΄Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ дисфункциСй, Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° холСстСрина ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‡. Π”ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ· наслСдствСнных спастичСских ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΉ устанавливаСтся ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠΈ Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-анамнСстичСских Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ…, ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΡ… Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅Ρ€Π²Π½ΠΎΠΉ систСмы ΠΈ подтвСрТдаСтся молСкулярно-гСнСтичСскими ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ. Π›Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ наслСдствСнных спастичСских ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΉ симптоматичСскоС

    ΠžΠΏΡ‹Ρ‚ примСнСния нусинСрсСна Π² качСствС патогСнСтичСской Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Ρƒ взрослых ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² со спинальной ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ 5q Π² РСспубликС Π‘Π°ΡˆΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ‚ΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π½

    Get PDF
    Background. Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) affects 1 in 11,000 people. Until 2016, this was considered an incurable disease, but after the approval of nusinersen, the situation has changed. The efficacy of nusinersen therapy is also known in adult patients, although research is limited due to the majority of studies in infants and children. Nusinersen has been included in the list of β€œVital and Essential Medicines” since 2021.Aim. To analyze the experience of using nusinersen as a pathogenetic therapy for patients over 18 years of age with SMA 5q in the Republic of Bashkortostan.Materials and methods. We examined eight patients receiving pathogenetic therapy with nusinersen (SMA type 2 – 34.5 %, SMA type 3 – 65.5 %). The Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) and the Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) were used for evaluating the effectiveness of therapy.Results. The median increase on the HFMSE scale was +2 points (7.5, with the initial 5.5) and on the RULM scale – +4.5 points (17 points, with the initial 12.5). Clinically, this was expressed in an increase in muscle strength, an increase in daily activity; a decrease in bulbar, respiratory and vegetative disorders can also be noted. Subjectively, positive dynamics was noted in the increase in working capacity, improvement of the emotional background.Conclusion. The use of the drug nusinersen in adult patients with SMA 5q in some cases provides clinical improvement. The presence of an β€œoverall response” is defined as clinically significant change in one assessed measure of motor function.Β Π’Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Бпинальной ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ (БМА) Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅Ρ‚ 1 ΠΈΠ· 13 тыс. Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ. Π”ΠΎ 2016 Π³. ΠΎΠ½Π° ΡΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°Π»Π°ΡΡŒ Π½Π΅ΠΈΠ·Π»Π΅Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΡ‹ΠΌ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ, Π½ΠΎ послС одобрСния ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° нусинСрсСн ситуация измСнилась. Π­Ρ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ нусинСрсСном извСстна ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Ρƒ взрослых ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΈ Ρƒ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ. Π‘ 2021 Π³. нусинСрсСн Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ Π² ΠŸΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΡŒ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡ‹Ρ… ΠΈ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡˆΠΈΡ… лСкарствСнных ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² для мСдицинского примСнСния.ЦСль исслСдования – ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΎΠΏΡ‹Ρ‚ примСнСния ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° нусинСрсСн Π² качСствС патогСнСтичСской Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ€ΡˆΠ΅ 18 Π»Π΅Ρ‚ со БМА 5q Π² РСспубликС Π‘Π°ΡˆΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ‚ΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π½.ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Нами Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ обслСдованы 8 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΡŽ нусинСрсСном (БМА 2-Π³ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ° – 34,5 %, БМА 3-Π³ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ° – 65,5 %). Для ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ эффСктивности Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ использовались Π Π°ΡΡˆΠΈΡ€Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ шкала ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΈΡ†Ρ‹ Π₯аммСрсмит (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded, HFMSE) ΠΈ ΠŸΠ΅Ρ€Π΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΡƒΠ»ΡŒ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ…Π½ΠΈΡ… конСчностСй (Revised Upper Limb Module, RULM).Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. Π‘Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π½Π΅Π΅ количСство ΠΈΠ½ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΉ – 7,25. ВозрастаниС ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‹ ΠΏΠΎ шкалС HFMSE составило +2 Π±Π°Π»Π»Π° (7,5; ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ исходной 5,5 Π±Π°Π»Π»Π°), Π° ΠΏΠΎ шкалС RULM – +4,5 Π±Π°Π»Π»Π° (17; ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ исходной 12,5 Π±Π°Π»Π»Π°). ΠšΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈ это Π²Ρ‹Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ°Π»ΠΎΡΡŒ Π² ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ силы, ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ повсСднСвной активности ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ²; Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΠ±Π°Ρ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ…, Π΄Ρ‹Ρ…Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ Π²Π΅Π³Π΅Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π‘ΡƒΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° Π²Ρ‹Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ°Π»Π°ΡΡŒ Π² ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ работоспособности, ΡƒΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΌΠΎΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ„ΠΎΠ½Π°.Π’Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° нусинСрсСн Ρƒ взрослых ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² со БМА 5q Π² рядС случаСв обСспСчиваСт клиничСскоС ΡƒΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. НаличиС Β«ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ‚Π° Π² Ρ†Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΒ» опрСдСляСтся ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ клиничСски Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 1 ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ показатСля Π΄Π²ΠΈΠ³Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΉ.

    Current status of nuclear cardiology in the Russian Federation

    Get PDF
    The article is devoted to the analysis of the current status of nuclear cardiology in the Russian Federation. The data on the number of facilities performing radionuclide investigations for the diagnosis and monitoring of the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, their staffing and equipment are given. The statistics of the conducted nuclear cardiology tests for 2018-2020 are given, as well as their methods, features and diagnostic significance are described

    Analysis of the restoration of cardiology diagnostics scope in the Russian Federation during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of the Russian segment of the INCAPS COVID 2 study under the auspices of the International Atomic Energy Agency

    Get PDF
    Aim. To assess the changes in cardiology diagnostics scope in the Russian Federation during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.Material and methods. In an online survey organized by the Division of Human Health of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), including questions about changes in the workflow of diagnostic laboratories and the scope of cardiac diagnostics from March 2019 (pre-pandemic) to April 2020 (first wave of the pandemic) and April 2021 (recovery stage), 15 Russian medical centers from 5 cities took part.Results. The decrease in the diagnostics scope by April 2020 by 59,3% compared to March 2019, by April 2021, stopped and was replaced by growth (+7,1%, the recovery rate, 112,1%). The greatest increase was in routine examinations, such as echocardiography (+11,6%), stress echocardiography (+18,7%), stress single photon emission computed tomography (+9,7%), and to a lesser extent resting computed tomography angiography (+7,0%) and magnetic resonance imaging (+6,6%). The performance of stress electrocardiography, stress magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of endocarditis in April 2021 compared to March 2019 decreased by 10,3%, 63,2% and 62,5%, respectively.Conclusion. Due to the resumption of patient admissions for cardiac examinations during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, with the anti-epidemic measures taken and certain changes in the workflow, there has been a recovery in the diagnostics scope in most of the included centers

    Gaucher disease type 2 (case report)

    Get PDF
    The article describes a rare clinical case of Gaucher disease in a 5 month old girl, confirmed by molecular genetic analysis. In the presented clinical case, there is a onset of lysosomal accumulation disease, which is accompanied by changes in the clinical analysis of blood (anemia, thrombocytopenia), hepatosplenomegaly, congenital malformations (open arterial duct, open oval window) and severe neurologic deficit

    Impact of the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the diagnosis of heart disease in the Russian Federation: results from the Russian segment of the IAEA INCAPS COVID study

    Get PDF
    Aim. To assess the impact of the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the diagnosis of heart disease in the Russian Federation.Material and methods. Fifteen Russian medical centers from 5 cities took part in an online survey organized by the Division of Human Health of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), containing questions regarding alterations in cardiovascular procedure volumes resulting from COVID-19 in March-April 2020.Results. A number of outpatients undergoing cardiac diagnostic procedures was noted in 80% of clinics. Cardiovascular procedure volumes in the period from March 2019 to March 2020 in general decreased by 9,5%, and from March 2019 to April 2020, by 56,5%. Stress electrocardiography decreased by 38,4%, stress echocardiography by 72,5%, stress single-photon emission computed tomography by 66,9%, computed tomography angiography by 49,7%, magnetic resonance imaging by 42,7%, invasive coronary angiography by 40,7%. The decrease in diagnostic procedure volumes in selected regions (Tomsk Oblast, Kemerovo Oblast, Tatarstan) was not so pronounced compared to Moscow and St. Petersburg (-20,7%, -75,2%, -93,8% in April 2020, respectively, p<0,001).Conclusion. The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic caused a sharp decrease in the number of diagnostic cardiac procedures in Russia. This has potential longterm implications for patients with cardiovascular disease. Understanding these implications can help guide diagnostic strategies during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and minimize the future losses

    Impact of the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the diagnosis of heart disease in the Russian Federation: results from the Russian segment of the IAEA INCAPS COVID study

    No full text
    Aim. To assess the impact of the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the diagnosis of heart disease in the Russian Federation. Material and methods. Fifteen Russian medical centers from 5 cities took part in an online survey organized by the Division of Human Health of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), containing questions regarding alterations in cardiovascular procedure volumes resulting from COVID-19 in March-April 2020. Results. A number of outpatients undergoing cardiac diagnostic procedures was noted in 80% of clinics. Cardiovascular procedure volumes in the period from March 2019 to March 2020 in general decreased by 9,5%, and from March 2019 to April 2020, by 56,5%. Stress electrocardiography decreased by 38,4%, stress echocardiography by 72,5%, stress single-photon emission computed tomography by 66,9%, computed tomography angiography by 49,7%, magnetic resonance imaging by 42,7%, invasive coronary angiography by 40,7%. The decrease in diagnostic procedure volumes in selected regions (Tomsk Oblast, Kemerovo Oblast, Tatarstan) was not so pronounced compared to Moscow and St. Petersburg (-20,7%,-75,2%,-93,8% in April 2020, respectively, p<0,001). Conclusion. The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic caused a sharp decrease in the number of diagnostic cardiac procedures in Russia. This has potential long-term implications for patients with cardiovascular disease. Understanding these implications can help guide diagnostic strategies during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and minimize the future losses
    corecore