Portraying the nature of corruption: Using an explorative case-study design

What is the nature of corruption in Western democracies? To answer this research question, the authors study 10 Dutch corruption cases in depth, looking at confidential criminal files. The cases allow them to sketch a general profile of a corruption case. The authors offer nine propositions to portray the nature of corruption. They conclude that corruption usually takes place within enduring relationships, that the process of becoming corrupt can be characterized as a slippery slope, and that important motives for corruption, aside from material gain, include friendship or love, status, and the desire to impress others. The explorative multiple case study methodology helps to expand our understanding of the way in which officials become corrupt. © 2008 The American Society for Public Administration

Is American Public Administration Detached From Historical Context?: On the Nature of Time and the Need to Understand It in Government and Its Study

The study of public administration pays little attention to history. Most publications are focused on current problems (the present) and desired solutions (the future) and are concerned mainly with organizational structure (a substantive issue) and output targets (an aggregative issue that involves measures of both individual performance and organizational productivity/services). There is much less consideration of how public administration (i.e., organization, policy, the study, etc.) unfolds over time. History, and so administrative history, is regarded as a “past” that can be recorded for its own sake but has little relevance to contemporary challenges. This view of history is the product of a diminished and anemic sense of time, resulting from organizing the past as a series of events that inexorably lead up to the present in a linear fashion. To improve the understanding of government’s role and position in society, public administration scholarship needs to reacquaint itself with the nature of time.Yeshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guideline

Administração pública comparada: uma avaliação das reformas administrativas do Brasil, EUA e União Européia Comparative public administration: an assessment of the administrative reforms in Brazil, USA and the European Union

Este artigo aprofunda o debate, no âmbito da ciência da administração pública - sob o enfoque da administração pública comparada -, sobre a evolução e os problemas recentes na gestão da administração pública no Brasil, EUA e União Européia. A análise revela que as reformas administrativas chegaram à maioria dos países do mundo impelidas pelo Consenso de Washington. Distintos estudos constatam que, a new public management (NPM - nova gestão pública) pode ter afetado muitos países, mas o teria feito em alguns de forma mais profunda. Observa-se que, tanto no Brasil quanto nos países selecionados, fortes elementos de continuidade podem ser identificados, depois de mais de 20 anos de reforma, demonstrando que as reformas colaboraram muito pouco em termos de estabilidade ou satisfação.<br>This article deepens the discussion, within the public administration science and from the comparative public administration perspective, about the recent evolution and problems in the management of the public administration in Brazil, USA and the European Union. The analysis reveals that administrative reforms have arrived to most countries impelled by the Washington Consensus. Distinct studies evidence that the New Public Management (NPM) may have affected many countries, but it had a deeper effect in some than in others. Both in Brazil and in the selected countries in this article strong elements of continuity can be identified after over 20 years of reform, showing that the reforms have helped very little in terms of stability or satisfaction