3 research outputs found
TOPICAL ISSUES OF ANTICORRUPTION ENLIGHTENMENT AND ANTICORRUPTION EDUCATION
Objective: to familiarize a wide range of interested persons with the results of the 2nd Siberian Anti-corruption Forum with international participation βTopical issues of anti-corruption enlightenment and anti-corruption educationβ held on 15-16September 2016 at the Siberian Federal University (Krasnoyarsk).Methods: in the preparation of their presentations, the forum participants used the scientific method of dialectical cognition, and a number of specific scientific methods: historical-legal, systemic-structural, comparative legal, formal logic (deduction, induction, definition and division of concepts), etc.Results: elaboration of proposals on improvement of anti-corruption enlightenment and anti-corruption education. In the forum took part the Vice-rector for social Affairs of SFU, Doctor of Economics, Professor S. I. Mutovin, Director of the Law Institute of SFU, Doctor of Law, Professor I. V. Shishko and Head of Research and Development Department of International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO (France), PhD in Education M. Poisson, Head of the Department of Delictology and Criminology of the Law Institute of SFU, Doctor of Law, Professor N. V. Shchedrin, Director of the Center for anti-corruption technologies (Tomsk), PhD in Law S. M. Budatarov, Head of the Center for the Russian Law Studies, Professor of the Heilongjiang University of Harbin (China), PhD in Law Pan Dunmay, Director of the Center for combating corruption and legal expertise of SFU, Associate Professor of the Deparment of Delictology and Criminology of the Law Institute of SFU, PhD in Law I. A. Damm, as well as representatives of public authorities, local governments, civil society institutions, and mass media.Scientific novelty: the forum held interdisciplinary scientific-practical discussion of the key issues of formation of public intolerance towards corruption behavior by means of anti-corruption enlightenment and anti-corruption education. Practical significance: in the ensued scientific discussion, the forum participants put forward a number of proposals for improvement of legal regulation and organization of anti-corruption enlightenment and anti-corruption education in the light of the accumulated experience, including in foreign countries
SECURITY MEASURES AS A MEANS OF CORRUPTION PREVENTION WHEN FINANCING ELECTION CAMPAIGNS
Objective: to prove the necessity to increase the efficiency of legal relations protection in the sphere of financing of election campaigns by implementing security measures. Methods: analytical, formal-logic (deduction, induction, defining and division of a notion), and comparative-legal. Results: basing on the analysis of the existing national and foreign election legislation, the author determines corruptive actions when financing election campaigns and suggests means for preventing such actions, such as the institution of election deposit and institution of candidateβs expenses compensation. Scientific novelty: for the first time such determinants of corruptive actions when financing election campaigns are defined as the possibility for the candidate to refuse from participating in voting without forcing circumstances, as well as the lack of efficient measures to prevent such refusal. The legislation states the norms creating conditions for committing corruption crimes, namely the possibility for the candidates to use guarantees of passive election right for sordid motives. Practical value: the theoretical provisions formulated in the research can be used in law-making activity, in particular, to serve as the basis for reforming the existing election legislation of the Russian Federation
The mechanism of corrupt conduct of the election committee member at individual level
Π‘Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΉ, Π±Π΅ΡΡΠΏΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ, ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ΅Π· ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ, Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π΅ΡΠ° Π² ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΡ ΠΈΠ·Π±ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΊ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π° ΠΈΠ·Π±ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΌΠ° Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ.Opportune prevention of corrupt actions undoubtedly promote considerable decrease of the harmful influence degree of this social phenomenon. It is impossible to construct the effective system of measures aimed as to prevention of the criminal conduct, as to retention of the potential corrupt person in the frame of legal conduct, without research of the mechanism of corrupt conduct. Since the election process is strongly influenced by corruption nowadays, consideration of the general provisions on the mechanism of corrupt conduct with reference to the activity of the election committee member seems to be extremely relevant