Comparative activity of carbapenem testing (the COMPACT study) in Turkey

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Recent evidence indicates that Gram-negative bacterial pathogens, the most common of which are <it>Pseudomonas </it>spp., <it>Enterobacteriaceae</it>, and <it>Acinetobacter baumannii</it>, are frequent causes of hospital-acquired infections. This study aims to evaluate the in vitro activity of doripenem and comparator carbapenem antibiotics against Gram-negative clinical isolates collected from COMParative Activity of Carbapenem Testing (COMPACT) study centres in Turkey.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Ten centres in Turkey were invited to submit <it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</it>, <it>Enterobacteriaceae</it>, and other Gram-negative isolates from intensive care unit (ICU)/non-ICU patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections, bloodstream infections, or nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia, between May and October 2008. Susceptibility was determined by each centre using E-test. A central laboratory performed species confirmation as well as limited susceptibility and quality-control testing.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Five hundred and ninety six isolates were collected. MIC₉₀values for doripenem, meropenem, and imipenem, respectively, were 32, ≥ 64, and ≥ 64 mg/L against <it>Pseudomonas </it>spp.; 0.12, 0.12, and 0.5 mg/L against <it>Enterobacteriaceae</it>; and ≥ 64 mg/L for each against other Gram-negative isolates. In determining the susceptibility of hospital isolates of selected Gram-negative pathogens to doripenem, imipenem, and meropenem, we found that against all pathogens combined, the MIC₉₀for ICU compared with non-ICU isolates was higher.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Doripenem showed similar or slightly better activity than meropenem and better activity than imipenem against the Gram-negative pathogens collected in Turkey.</p

Changes in gram negative microorganisms’ resistance pattern during 4 years period in a referral teaching hospital; a surveillance study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background and purpose</p> <p>Surveillance studies evaluating antimicrobial susceptibilities are of great value in preventing the spread of resistant pathogens by elucidating the trend of resistance in commonly used antibiotics and as a consequence providing information for prescribing the most appropriate agent. This study is a longitudinal antimicrobial resistance surveillance study designed to evaluate the trend in antimicrobial resistance to gram negative microorganisms from 2007 to 2010.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>During a four-year period (2007–2010) isolates derived from all patients admitted to infectious diseases ward of Imam Khomeini Hospital, the major referral center for infectious disease in Iran with the highest admission rates, were evaluated. Based on disk diffusion method and zone of inhibition size, the microorganism was regarded as to be sensitive, resistant or has intermediate susceptibility to the antimicrobial agents.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The widest spread Gram-negative microorganism in all of isolates taken together in our study was <it>E.coli</it> (30%) followed by <it>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</it> in 28.6% and <it>Enterobacter spp.</it> in 11.9%, respectively. The susceptibility to amikacin, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and nitrofurantoin was equal or above 50% for all microorganisms over four years. However, the susceptibility to ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, cefotaxim, and ceftriaxone was less than 50% in derived isolates during the study period.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In conclusion, the finding of the present study revealed that resistance rate to common antimicrobial agents in Iran is growing and isolates were susceptible mostly to broad-spectrum antibiotics including imipenem and piperacillin/tazobactam.</p