Welche Lymphadenektomie bei papillärem Schilddrüsenkarzinom?

Fragestellung: Die Bedeutung von Lymphknotenbefall bei papillärem Schilddrüsenkarzinom und die optimale Lymphknotenchirurgie werden kontrovers beurteilt. Methodik: Retrospektive Langzeitstudie eines Operateurs (n = 159), prospektive Dokumentation, Nachkontrolle 1-27 (x = 8) Jahre, Untersuchung mit Bezug auf Lymphknotenbefall. Resultate: Staging. Bei 42 Patienten wurde wegen makroskopischem Lymphknotenbefall (cN1) eine therapeutische Lymphadenektomie durchgeführt, mit pN1 Status bei 41 (98%) Patienten. Unter 117 Patienten ohne Anhalt für Lymphknotenbefall (cN0) fand sich okkulter Befall bei 5/29 (17%) Patienten mit elektiver (prophylaktischer) Lymphadenektomie, und bei 2/88 (2.3%) Patienten ohne Lymphadenektomie (metachroner Befall) (p = 45-jährige) Patienten (50% vs. 86%; p = 0.03). Diskussion: Der makroskopische intraoperative Lymphknotenbefund (cN) hat Bedeutung: - Befall ist meistens richtig positiv (pN1) und erfordert eine ausreichend radikale, d.h. systematische, kompartiment-orientierte Lymphadenektomie (Mikrodissektion) zur Verhütung von - kurablem oder gefährlichem - Rezidiv. - Okkulter Befall bei unauffälligen Lymphknoten führt selten zum klinischen Rezidiv und beeinflusst das Überleben nicht. Wir empfehlen eine weniger radikale (sampling), nur zentrale prophylaktische Lymphadenektomie, ohne Risiko von chirurgischer Morbidität. Ein empfindlicherer Nachweis von okkultem Befund (Immunhistochemie, Schnellschnitt von sampling Gewebe oder sentinel nodes) erscheint nicht rational. Bei pN0, cN0 Befund kommen Verzicht auf 131I Prophylaxe und eine weniger intensive Nachsorge in Frage. Abstract Background. The optimal treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is still debated, also with respect to nodal treatment. Method. Retrospective analysis of a personal series of 159 patients with PTC, with respect to nodal disease, follow up 1-27 (mean 8) years. Results. In 42 patients with clinical, macroscopic nodal disease (cN1) a therapeutic lymphadenectomy was performed, with pN1 status in 41 (98%) patients. 117 patients had no clinical or intraoperative suspicion of nodal involvement (cN0), with occult nodal disease in 5/29 (17%) patients undergoing prophylactic (elective) lymphadenectomy, and in 2/88 (2.3%) patients without primary lymphadenectomy (metachronous nodal disease) (p < 0.005). Nodal recurrences were observed (1-5 years after primary treatment for cure) in 5/42 (12%) pN1 and in 3/114 (2.6%) cN0, pN0 tumors (p = 0.009), with unfavourable outcome in 2 and 1 patients, respectively. The 20-year tumor specific survival was 100% in TNM I + II (low risk) patients (including pN1 and N0 tumors); the survival rate was deteriorated by stage pN1 vs. N0 in TNM high risk patients (50% vs. 86%; p = 0.03). Discussion. The intraoperative macroscopic staging (cN) remains important: -clinical nodal disease warrants a systematic node dissection (microdissection), for preventing (curable or serious) nodal recurrences. Occult nodal disease does not evolve frequently in clinical nodal recurrence. A less radical (and only central) prophylactic lymphadenectomy, avoiding surgical morbidity, may be oncologically adequate. More sensitive detection of nodal positivity (frozen section of sampling tissue or sentinel nodes, immunhistochemistry) appears not rationale. In pN0, cN0 tumors use of prophylactic 131I may represent overtreatment, and follow up controls may be conducted less rigorously

Differentiation of human follicular thyroid adenomas from carcinomas by gene expression profiling

It is difficult to distinguish benign from malignant follicular thyroid tumors by histological or cytological examination. The goal of this study was to reveal gene expression variations between benign and malignant follicular lesions of the thyroid gland. We investigated gene expression profiles from 24 follicular thyroid tumors (12 carcinomas and 12 adenomas) and 13 normal thyroid tissues using high-density human cDNA arrays. The identification of gene expression changes was based on signal intensity ratios of tumor versus normal thyroid parenchyma. Expression patterns of a set of known genes were found to be significantly different between follicular adenomas and follicular carcinomas. Our results demonstrate a potential use of gene expression profiling for differentiating benign from malignant follicular thyroid tumors. A detailed investigation of the differentially expressed genes could give new insights into molecular pathways of malignant transformation of thyroid follicular neoplasm and may help to develop a molecular tool for the preoperative differential diagnosis

Lymph node surgery in papillary thyroid carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The impact of nodal disease remains controversial in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). STUDY DESIGN: One surgeon treated 159 unselected patients, who were followed up for 1 to 27 years. We present a retrospective analysis with respect to nodal disease. Occult nodal disease was investigated, including metachronous nodal disease (mpN(1)) in primarily node negative patients (pN(0), clinical [c]N(0)). RESULTS: Therapeutic lymphadenectomies, prophylactic lymphadenectomies, or no lymphadenectomy were carried out in 42 (cN(1)), 29 (cN(0)), and 88 (cN(0)) patients, respectively, with stage pN(1) in 41 (98%), in 5 (17%), and in 2 (2.3%) patients, respectively (17% versus 2.3% p < 0.005). Sensitivity and specificity of clinical staging were 85% and 99%, respectively. More frequent prophylactic lymphadenectomy during the study period (p = 0.002) led to a nonsignificant increase in stage pN(1) (26% versus 30%). Immunohistochemistry led to upstaging of only 3% of histologically negative nodes and one (4%) pN(0) patient. Nodal recurrence occurred in 8 of 156 patients (5%) treated for cure, in 12% of pN(1) versus 3% of pN(0) cN(0) tumors (p = 0.009), in 15% of TNM high-versus 3% of low-risk patients (p = 0.006), and in 5% each of patients, younger than 45 and 45 years or more. In TNM high-risk patients, tumor-related survival was 50% for stage pN(1) versus 86% for stage pN(0), cN(0) (p = 0.03) (100% and 100% in low-risk patients). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of occult nodal disease might be relatively low, and it does not frequently progress to clinical recurrent disease. Clinical nodal status might be valid for deciding the extent and radicality of node dissection. Prophylactic (central) lymphadenectomy should be carried out without radicality-associated morbidity. Macroscopic nodal disease warrants more rigorous, compartment-oriented lymphadenectomy. There is no rationale for detection of occult disease and micrometastasis by frozen section or immunohistochemistry