38 research outputs found

    Collaboration with Interpreters in K-12 Education

    Get PDF
    Educational interpreting for students who are Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH), like other interpreting specializations, involves much more than linguistic competence, message management skills, and cultural competence. An educational interpreter uses those skills and competencies within the K-12 environment populated by other educational professionals (e.g., related services personnel and teachers). Best practices in educational interpreting suggest that collaboration between the interpreter and the rest of the IEP team is fundamental. However, strategies for such collaboration are not outlined in the literature. This two-phase study examined collaboration in the K-12 school setting between educational interpreters and other educational professionals (OEPs) (i.e., general education teachers, teachers of the Deaf and hard of hearing, special education teachers, and speech-language pathologists) in order to identify the patterns of collaborative practices. The researcher distributed a national survey instrument. The researcher then conducted interviews with a randomly selected volunteer from each job category. The data gathered indicated that collaboration not only takes place in K-12 settings but also appeared to be a critical element of the work done by educational interpreters and OEPs in service of DHH children in K-12 education. The study revealed existing patterns of collaborative practice including resource and information sharing, attendance of meetings and training, problemsolving, and building of rapport. It also detected factors that supported or inhibited collaborative efforts such as availability of time, sharing of student-related information, perceptions of expertise and professionalism, and confusion regarding the role of the interpreter. Findings suggested that collaboration with interpreters in K-12 settings necessitates coordinated and strategic efforts on the part of interpreters and OEPs who work with students who are Deaf and hard of hearing

    Precipitation of Sodium Diuranate from Pitchblende Liquors

    Get PDF
    In the treatment of carnotite concentrates, sodium diuranate was prepared by acidifying tricarbonate liquors to eliminate carbon dioxide, and then precipitating the sodium salt by the addition of caustic. Direct precipitation of uranium by the addition of caustic to tricarbonate liquors was used when pitchblende ores were processed, because this procedure was more effective in giving a product with a low molybdenum content. Tests of this method in the laboratory and Pilot Plant indicated that low uranium losses (0.2 to 0.3%) would be encountered with typical liquors if 1.7 to 2.0 lbs of caustic were added for every pound of uranosic oxide in solution. Since losses as high as 3% were incurred in plant operations, further work was undertaken, in an effort to reduce the uranium concentration in the waste liquors

    Preparation and use of Ammonium Diuranate in the Ether Extraction Process

    No full text
    In the ether extraction process, as originally developed, purified uranium dioxide was obtained by evaporation and calcination of the uranyl nitrate solution, followed by calcination of the resultant UO{sub 3}. It was suggested that an alternate procedure might be developed, involving the precipitation of uranium from the nitrate solution as ammonium diuranate. This material could then be calcined to uranosic acid, or reduced directly to the dioxide. It had already been established that ammonium diuranate could be precipitated completely from uranyl nitrate solutions. Experiments were carried out to determine whether a basic nitrate, analogous to a known sulfate salt, would be formed in the process. Both direct reduction of the diuranate to UO{sub 2} and calcination to uranosic acid were investigated to determine the physical characteristics and residual nitrogen of the resultant brown oxide

    The Distribution of Impurities in the Ether Extraction Process

    No full text
    When uranium is purified by the ether extraction method, black oxide is dissolved in nitric acid and ether is added; an ether layer containing uranium and an aqueous layer containing uranium and impurities are obtained. The distribution of some impurities between the two phases and the effect of such impurities on the extraction process were studied. the processing required in the preparation of pure uranyl nitrate might be decreased if, instead of uranosic oxide, sodium diuranate was used as a source of uranium. If it is assumed that uranosic oxide contains the same amounts of impurities as sodium diuranate, with the exception of soda, the extraction of soda by the wash of an ether solution of nitrate prepared from diuranate would be the criterion of suitability of sodium diuranate. The distribution and effect of sodium in the extraction process was therefore investigated, and the results are described in this report. For various of the impurities, the distribution in the process and the effect on uranium holdup in the insoluble cake was investigated. Particular attention was given to the behavior of boron, vanadium, chromium, and molybdenum
    corecore