Vascular Metabolism as Driver of Atherosclerosis: Linking Endothelial Metabolism to Inflammation

The endothelium is a crucial regulator of vascular homeostasis by controlling barrier integrity as well acting as an important signal transducer, thereby illustrating that endothelial cells are not inert cells. In the context of atherosclerosis, this barrier function is impaired and endothelial cells become activated, resulting in the upregulation of adhesion molecules, secretion of cytokines and chemokines and internalization of integrins. Finally, this leads to increased vessel permeability, thereby facilitating leukocyte extravasation as well as fostering a pro-inflammatory environment. Additionally, activated endothelial cells can form migrating tip cells and proliferative stalk cells, resulting in the formation of new blood vessels. Emerging evidence has accumulated indicating that cellular metabolism is crucial in fueling these pro-atherosclerotic processes, including neovascularization and inflammation, thereby contributing to plaque progression and altering plaque stability. Therefore, further research is necessary to unravel the complex mechanisms underlying endothelial cell metabolic changes, and exploit this knowledge for finding and developing potential future therapeutic strategies. In this review we discuss the metabolic alterations endothelial cells undergo in the context of inflammation and atherosclerosis and how this relates to changes in endothelial functioning. Finally, we will describe several metabolic targets that are currently being used for therapeutic interventions

Surmounting the endothelial barrier for delivery of drugs and imaging tracers

The endothelium is crucial for maintaining vascular homeostasis and functions as a barrier between blood components and tissue. In atherosclerosis, this barrier function is impaired, which is characterized by secretion of chemoattractants and cytokines, upregulation of adhesion molecules and increased vascular permeability. This facilitates enhanced leukocyte migration through the vessel wall. Fortunately, we can utilize these features to our advantage by using nanomedicine to deliver drugs and imaging tracers into the interstitial space. This provides us with targeted, local delivery of therapeutic agents, which enhances the specificity and efficacy of these agents and thus, could be used to inhibit disease progression. Additionally, delivery of imaging tracers in the interstitial space will give us insight into the vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaques by targeting resident macrophages and activated endothelial cells, providing pivotal information that is currently lacking in the clinic. In this review, we discuss how the endothelial barrier is affected during atherosclerosis and how to surmount this barrier for successful delivery of nanomedicine carrying drugs and imaging tracers to both the endothelium and macrophages

Targeting epigenetics as atherosclerosis treatment: an updated view

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses the current developments on epigenetic inhibition as treatment for atherosclerosis. RECENT FINDINGS: The first phase III clinical trial targeting epigenetics in cardiovascular disease (CVD), BETonMACE, using the bromodomain inhibitor apabetalone (RVX-208) showed no significant effect on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with type II diabetes, low HDL-c and a recent acute coronary artery event compared with its placebo arm. SUMMARY: Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that targeting epigenetics in atherosclerosis is a promising novel therapeutic strategy against CVD. Interfering with histone acetylation by targeting histone deacetylates (HDACs) and bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) proteins demonstrated encouraging results in modulating disease progression in model systems. Although the first phase III clinical trial targeting BET in CVD showed no effect on MACE, we suggest that there is sufficient potential for future clinical usage based on the outcomes in specific subgroups and the fact that the study was slightly underpowered. Lastly, we propose that there is future window for targeting repressive histone modifications in atherosclerosis

Lipoprotein(a): An underestimated inflammatory mastermind

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been established as an independent and causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Individuals with elevated levels of Lp(a) (>125 nmol/L; >50 mg/dl) display increased arterial wall inflammation characterized by activation of the endothelium by Lp(a)-carried oxidized phospholipids and recruitment of circulating monocytes. This results in increased secretion of chemoattractants and cytokines, upregulation of adhesion molecules and increased migration of leukocytes through the vessel wall. In addition, Lp(a) is also pivotal in the initiation phase of aortic valve stenosis. The oxidized phospholipids associated, in part, with the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] moiety of Lp(a) stimulate the aortic valve residential cell, the valve interstitial cells (VICs), to either induce osteoblastic differentiation or apoptosis, thereby initiating the process of aortic valve calcification. Lastly, Lp(a) has been linked to systemic inflammation, including the acute phase response. Specifically, the cytokine interleukin 6 (IL-6) has a unique relationship with Lp(a), since the LPA gene contains IL-6 response elements. In this review, we will discuss the pathways and cell types affected by Lp(a) in the context of atherosclerosis, aortic valve stenosis and the acute phase response, highlighting the role of Lp(a) as an inflammatory mastermind

Surmounting the endothelial barrier for delivery of drugs and imaging tracers

The endothelium is crucial for maintaining vascular homeostasis and functions as a barrier between blood components and tissue. In atherosclerosis, this barrier function is impaired, which is characterized by secretion of chemoattractants and cytokines, upregulation of adhesion molecules and increased vascular permeability. This facilitates enhanced leukocyte migration through the vessel wall. Fortunately, we can utilize these features to our advantage by using nanomedicine to deliver drugs and imaging tracers into the interstitial space. This provides us with targeted, local delivery of therapeutic agents, which enhances the specificity and efficacy of these agents and thus, could be used to inhibit disease progression. Additionally, delivery of imaging tracers in the interstitial space will give us insight into the vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaques by targeting resident macrophages and activated endothelial cells, providing pivotal information that is currently lacking in the clinic. In this review, we discuss how the endothelial barrier is affected during atherosclerosis and how to surmount this barrier for successful delivery of nanomedicine carrying drugs and imaging tracers to both the endothelium and macrophages

Lipoprotein(a): An underestimated inflammatory mastermind

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been established as an independent and causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Individuals with elevated levels of Lp(a) (>125 nmol/L; >50 mg/dl) display increased arterial wall inflammation characterized by activation of the endothelium by Lp(a)-carried oxidized phospholipids and recruitment of circulating monocytes. This results in increased secretion of chemoattractants and cytokines, upregulation of adhesion molecules and increased migration of leukocytes through the vessel wall. In addition, Lp(a) is also pivotal in the initiation phase of aortic valve stenosis. The oxidized phospholipids associated, in part, with the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] moiety of Lp(a) stimulate the aortic valve residential cell, the valve interstitial cells (VICs), to either induce osteoblastic differentiation or apoptosis, thereby initiating the process of aortic valve calcification. Lastly, Lp(a) has been linked to systemic inflammation, including the acute phase response. Specifically, the cytokine interleukin 6 (IL-6) has a unique relationship with Lp(a), since the LPA gene contains IL-6 response elements. In this review, we will discuss the pathways and cell types affected by Lp(a) in the context of atherosclerosis, aortic valve stenosis and the acute phase response, highlighting the role of Lp(a) as an inflammatory mastermind

Elevated Lp(a) (Lipoprotein[a]) Levels Increase Risk of 30-Day Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients Following Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: General population studies have shown that elevated Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) levels are an emerging risk factor for cardiovascular disease and subsequent cardiovascular events. The role of Lp(a) for the risk of secondary MACE in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is unknown. Our objective is to assess the association of elevated Lp(a) levels with the risk of secondary MACE in patients undergoing CEA. METHODS: Lp(a) concentrations were determined in preoperative blood samples of 944 consecutive patients with CEA included in the Athero-Express Biobank Study. During 3-year follow-up, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), consisting of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death, were documented. RESULTS: After 3 years follow-up, Kaplan-Meier cumulative event rates for MACE were 15.4% in patients with high Lp(a) levels (>137 nmol/L; >80th cohort percentile) and 10.2% in patients with low Lp(a) levels (≤137 nmol/L; ≤80th cohort percentile; log-rank test: P=0.047). Cox regression analyses adjusted for conventional cardiovascular risk factors revealed a significant association between high Lp(a) levels and 3-year MACE with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.69 (95% CI, 1.07-2.66). One-third of MACE occurred within 30 days after CEA, with an adjusted hazard ratio for the 30-day risk of MACE of 2.05 (95% CI, 1.01-4.17). Kaplan-Meier curves from time point 30 days to 3 years onward revealed no significant association between high Lp(a) levels and MACE. Lp(a) levels were not associated with histological carotid plaque characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: High Lp(a) levels (>137 nmol/L; >80th cohort percentile) are associated with an increased risk of 30-day MACE after CEA. This identifies elevated Lp(a) levels as a new potential risk factor for secondary cardiovascular events in patients after carotid surgery. Future studies are required to investigate whether Lp(a) levels might be useful in guiding treatment algorithms for carotid intervention

Reduced baroreflex sensitivity and increased splenic activity in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea

Background and aims: Severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Experimental evidence suggests that this risk may be mediated by chronic sympathetic hyperactivation and systemic inflammation, but the precise mechanisms remain to be unraveled. Our aim was to evaluate whether severe OSA patients are characterized by increased sympathetic and hematopoietic activity, potentially driving atherosclerosis. Methods: Untreated patients with severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) > 30 per hour) were matched with mild OSA patients (AHI5 per hour) according to age, sex, and body mass index. Study objectives were to assess baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and heart-rate variability (HRV) using continuous finger blood pressure measurements, hematopoietic activity in the bone marrow and spleen, and arterial inflammation with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). Results: A total of 34 subjects, 17 per group, were included in the analysis. Mean age was 60.7 ± 6.2 years, 24 (70.6%) were male. Mean AHI was 40.5 ± 12.6 per hour in the severe OSA group, and 10.5 ± 3.4 per hour in the mild OSA group. Participants with severe OSA were characterized by reduced BRS (5.7 [4.6–7.8] ms/mmHg in severe vs 8.2 [6.9–11.8] ms/mmHg in mild OSA, p = 0.033) and increased splenic activity (severe OSA 18F-FDG uptake 3.56 ± 0.77 vs mild OSA 3.01 ± 0.68; p = 0.036). HRV, bone marrow activity and arterial inflammation were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Patients with severe OSA are characterized by decreased BRS and increased splenic activity. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to assess whether OSA treatment reduces sympathetic and splenic activity

Reduced baroreflex sensitivity and increased splenic activity in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea

Background and aims: Severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Experimental evidence suggests that this risk may be mediated by chronic sympathetic hyperactivation and systemic inflammation, but the precise mechanisms remain to be unraveled. Our aim was to evaluate whether severe OSA patients are characterized by increased sympathetic and hematopoietic activity, potentially driving atherosclerosis. Methods: Untreated patients with severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) > 30 per hour) were matched with mild OSA patients (AHI5 per hour) according to age, sex, and body mass index. Study objectives were to assess baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and heart-rate variability (HRV) using continuous finger blood pressure measurements, hematopoietic activity in the bone marrow and spleen, and arterial inflammation with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). Results: A total of 34 subjects, 17 per group, were included in the analysis. Mean age was 60.7 ± 6.2 years, 24 (70.6%) were male. Mean AHI was 40.5 ± 12.6 per hour in the severe OSA group, and 10.5 ± 3.4 per hour in the mild OSA group. Participants with severe OSA were characterized by reduced BRS (5.7 [4.6–7.8] ms/mmHg in severe vs 8.2 [6.9–11.8] ms/mmHg in mild OSA, p = 0.033) and increased splenic activity (severe OSA 18F-FDG uptake 3.56 ± 0.77 vs mild OSA 3.01 ± 0.68; p = 0.036). HRV, bone marrow activity and arterial inflammation were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Patients with severe OSA are characterized by decreased BRS and increased splenic activity. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to assess whether OSA treatment reduces sympathetic and splenic activity