Comparison of nice classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps and morphology of removed lesions depending on localisation in colon

Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Ilona Vilkoite et al., published by Sciendo.The narrow-band imaging (NBI) International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification is based on narrow-band pictures of colon polyps viewed through a narrow-band spectrum. The categorisation utilises staining, surface structure, and vascular patterns to differentiate between hyperplastic and adenomatous colon polyps. It is known that accuracy of the NICE classification for colorectal polyps varies depending on the localisation in the colon.The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the NICE classification and the gold standard - morphological analysis for the determination of the type of colorectal lesions depending on localisation in colon. A prospective study was performed in an outpatient clinic. 1214 colonoscopies were performed by two expert endoscopists and 475 polyps were found in 291 patients. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the NICE classification was 80.3%. Optical verification was better in ascending colon - 93.9%, followed by sigmoid colon - 82.1%. Inferior results were found for the descending colon - 64.0%. The results of this study showed that the NICE classification could be a helpful instrument in daily practice for the ascending and sigmoid colon. For better results, proper training should be considered. The NICE system could have a role in the replacement of morphological analysis if appropriate results of verification could be achieved.publishersversionPeer reviewe

Biopsy Sampling in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy : A Survey from 10 Tertiary Referral Centres across Europe

Funding Information: A. Link reports grants from European Commission “Eu-ropäischer Fond für regionale Entwicklung” (EFRE), outside the submitted work. In Lithuania the work was partly supported by Lithuanian Research Council Grant no APP-2/2016. In Latvia, the methodological support was made available from the project lzp-2018/1-0135. This work was also supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care). In Barcelona, we thank the CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya for the support. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.Background: Guidelines give robust recommendations on which biopsies should be taken when there is endoscopic suggestion of gastric inflammation. Adherence to these guidelines often seems arbitrary. This study aimed to give an overview on current practice in tertiary referral centres across Europe. Methods: Data were collected at 10 tertiary referral centres. Demographic data, the indication for each procedure, endoscopic findings, and the number and sampling site of biopsies were recorded. Findings were compared between centres, and factors influencing the decision to take biopsies were explored. Results: Biopsies were taken in 56.6% of 9,425 procedures, with significant variation between centres (p < 0.001). Gastric biopsies were taken in 43.8% of all procedures. Sampling location varied with the procedure indication (p < 0.001) without consistent pattern across the centres. Fewer biopsies were taken in centres which routinely applied the updated Sydney classification for gastritis assessment (46.0%), compared to centres where this was done only upon request (75.3%, p < 0.001). This was the same for centres stratifying patients according to the OLGA system (51.8 vs. 73.0%, p < 0.001). More biopsies were taken in centres following the MAPS guidelines on stomach surveillance (68.1 vs. 37.1%, p < 0.001). Biopsy sampling was more likely in younger patients in 8 centres (p < 0.05), but this was not true for the whole cohort (p = 0.537). The percentage of procedures with biopsies correlated directly with additional costs charged in case of biopsies (r = 0.709, p = 0.022). Conclusion: Adherence to guideline recommendations for biopsy sampling at gastroscopy was inconsistent across the participating centres. Our data suggest that centre-specific policies are applied instead.publishersversionPeer reviewe