RACCER: Towards Reachable and Certain Counterfactual Explanations for Reinforcement Learning

While reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms have been successfully applied to numerous tasks, their reliance on neural networks makes their behavior difficult to understand and trust. Counterfactual explanations are human-friendly explanations that offer users actionable advice on how to alter the model inputs to achieve the desired output from a black-box system. However, current approaches to generating counterfactuals in RL ignore the stochastic and sequential nature of RL tasks and can produce counterfactuals that are difficult to obtain or do not deliver the desired outcome. In this work, we propose RACCER, the first RL-specific approach to generating counterfactual explanations for the behavior of RL agents. We first propose and implement a set of RL-specific counterfactual properties that ensure easily reachable counterfactuals with highly probable desired outcomes. We use a heuristic tree search of the agent's execution trajectories to find the most suitable counterfactuals based on the defined properties. We evaluate RACCER in two tasks as well as conduct a user study to show that RL-specific counterfactuals help users better understand agents' behavior compared to the current state-of-the-art approaches.Comment: 10 pages, 3 figures, 3 table

Expert-Free Online Transfer Learning in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Transfer learning in Reinforcement Learning (RL) has been widely studied to overcome training issues of Deep-RL, i.e., exploration cost, data availability and convergence time, by introducing a way to enhance training phase with external knowledge. Generally, knowledge is transferred from expert-agents to novices. While this fixes the issue for a novice agent, a good understanding of the task on expert agent is required for such transfer to be effective. As an alternative, in this paper we propose Expert-Free Online Transfer Learning (EF-OnTL), an algorithm that enables expert-free real-time dynamic transfer learning in multi-agent system. No dedicated expert exists, and transfer source agent and knowledge to be transferred are dynamically selected at each transfer step based on agents' performance and uncertainty. To improve uncertainty estimation, we also propose State Action Reward Next-State Random Network Distillation (sars-RND), an extension of RND that estimates uncertainty from RL agent-environment interaction. We demonstrate EF-OnTL effectiveness against a no-transfer scenario and advice-based baselines, with and without expert agents, in three benchmark tasks: Cart-Pole, a grid-based Multi-Team Predator-Prey (mt-pp) and Half Field Offense (HFO). Our results show that EF-OnTL achieve overall comparable performance when compared against advice-based baselines while not requiring any external input nor threshold tuning. EF-OnTL outperforms no-transfer with an improvement related to the complexity of the task addressed

Deep W-Networks: Solving Multi-Objective Optimisation Problems With Deep Reinforcement Learning

In this paper, we build on advances introduced by the Deep Q-Networks (DQN) approach to extend the multi-objective tabular Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithm W-learning to large state spaces. W-learning algorithm can naturally solve the competition between multiple single policies in multi-objective environments. However, the tabular version does not scale well to environments with large state spaces. To address this issue, we replace underlying Q-tables with DQN, and propose an addition of W-Networks, as a replacement for tabular weights (W) representations. We evaluate the resulting Deep W-Networks (DWN) approach in two widely-accepted multi-objective RL benchmarks: deep sea treasure and multi-objective mountain car. We show that DWN solves the competition between multiple policies while outperforming the baseline in the form of a DQN solution. Additionally, we demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can find the Pareto front in both tested environments

Causal Counterfactuals for Improving the Robustness of Reinforcement Learning

Reinforcement learning (RL) is applied in a wide variety of fields. RL enables agents to learn tasks autonomously by interacting with the environment. The more critical the tasks are, the higher the demand for the robustness of the RL systems. Causal RL combines RL and causal inference to make RL more robust. Causal RL agents use a causal representation to capture the invariant causal mechanisms that can be transferred from one task to another. Currently, there is limited research in Causal RL, and existing solutions are usually not complete or feasible for real-world applications. In this work, we propose CausalCF, the first complete Causal RL solution incorporating ideas from Causal Curiosity and CoPhy. Causal Curiosity provides an approach for using interventions, and CoPhy is modified to enable the RL agent to perform counterfactuals. We apply CausalCF to complex robotic tasks and show that it improves the RL agent's robustness using a realistic simulation environment called CausalWorld.Comment: Submission to ARMS-2023 (ARMS-2023: AAMAS 2023 Workshop on Autonomous Robots and Multirobot Systems

Prevalence of Code Smells in Reinforcement Learning Projects

Reinforcement Learning (RL) is being increasingly used to learn and adapt application behavior in many domains, including large-scale and safety critical systems, as for example, autonomous driving. With the advent of plug-n-play RL libraries, its applicability has further increased, enabling integration of RL algorithms by users. We note, however, that the majority of such code is not developed by RL engineers, which as a consequence, may lead to poor program quality yielding bugs, suboptimal performance, maintainability, and evolution problems for RL-based projects. In this paper we begin the exploration of this hypothesis, specific to code utilizing RL, analyzing different projects found in the wild, to assess their quality from a software engineering perspective. Our study includes 24 popular RL-based Python projects, analyzed with standard software engineering metrics. Our results, aligned with similar analyses for ML code in general, show that popular and widely reused RL repositories contain many code smells (3.95% of the code base on average), significantly affecting the projects' maintainability. The most common code smells detected are long method and long method chain, highlighting problems in the definition and interaction of agents. Detected code smells suggest problems in responsibility separation, and the appropriateness of current abstractions for the definition of RL algorithms.Comment: Paper preprint for the 2nd International Conference on AI Engineering Software Engineering for AI CAIN202