20 research outputs found

    Prevalence of post-traumatic neuropathic pain after digital nerve repair and finger amputation

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Post-traumatic neuropathic pain is a major factor affecting the quality of life after finger trauma and is reported with considerable variance in the literature. This can partially be attributed to the different methods of determining neuropathic pain. The Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) has been validated to be a reliable and non-invasive tool to assess the presence of neuropathic pain. This study investigated the prevalence of neuropathic pain after finger amputation or digital nerve repair using the DN4 questionnaire. Methods: Patients with finger amputation or digital nerve repair were identified between 2011 and 2018 at our institution. After a minimal follow-up of 12 months, the short form DN4 (S-DN4) was used to assess neuropathic pain. Results: A total of 120 patients were included: 50 patients with 91 digital amputations and 70 patients with 87 fingers with digital nerve repair. In the amputation group, 32% of the patients had pain, and 18% had neuropathic pain. In the digital nerve repair group, 38% of the patients had pain, and 14% had neuropathic pain. Secondly, of patient-, trauma-, and treatment-specific factors, only the time between trauma and surgery had a significant negative influence on the prevalence of neuropathic pain in patients with digital nerve repair. Conclusion: This study shows that persistent pain and neuropathic pain are common after finger trauma with nerve damage. One of the significant prognostic factors in developing neuropathic pain is treatment delay between trauma and time of digital nerve repair, which is of major clinical relevance for surgical planning of these injuries.</p

    Forearm rotation improves after corrective osteotomy in patients with symptomatic distal radius malunion

    Get PDF
    Objectives: Distal radius malunion can result in pain and functional complaints. One of the functional problems that can affect daily life is impaired forearm rotation. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of corrective osteotomy for distal radius malunion on forearm rotation at 12 months after surgery. We secondarily studied the effect on grip strength, radiological measurements, and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs). Patients and methods: This cohort study analysed prospectively collected data of adult patients with symptomatic distal radius malunion. All patients underwent corrective osteotomy for malunion and were followed for 1 year. We measured forearm rotation (pronation and supination) and grip strength and analysed radiographs. PROMs consisted of the Patient-Rated Hand/Wrist Evaluation (PRWHE) questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale for pain, and satisfaction with hand function. Results:Preoperative total forearm rotation was 112° (SD: 34°), of which supination of 49° (SD: 25°) was more impaired than pronation of 63° (SD: 17°). Twelve months after surgery, an unpaired Student's t-test showed a significant improvement of total forearm rotation to 142° (SD: 17°) (p &lt; 0.05). Pronation improved to 72° (SD: 10°), and supination to 69° (SD: 13°) (p &lt; 0.05). Grip strength, PROMs, as well as inclination and volar tilt on radiographs improved significantly during the first year after surgery (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: In patients with reduced forearm rotation due to distal radius malunion, corrective osteotomy is an effective treatment that significantly improves forearm rotation. In addition, this intervention improves grip strength, the PRWHE-score, pain, and satisfaction with hand function.</p

    Preoperative Indicators of the Effectiveness of Surgical Release in Patients with de Quervain Disease:A Prospective Cohort Study

    Get PDF
    Background: A significant proportion of patients report persistent pain after surgical release for de Quervain disease (DQ). This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a surgical release for DQ and to identify the preoperative factors associated with pain after a surgical release for DQ. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 707 patients who underwent surgical release and completed a visual analogue scale questionnaire (VAS; range 0 to 100). We used a paired t test to analyze the effectiveness of the surgical release on pain at 3 months postoperatively compared with the preoperative measure. A hierarchical multivariable linear regression model was created to investigate the contribution of patient-related and disease-related characteristics to postoperative pain. Results: All VAS domains showed improvement after surgical release. On average, the mean VAS pain decreased by 44 points (95% CI, 42, 46). Smoking (B = 6.37; P &lt; 0.01), younger age (B = -0.35; P &lt; 0.01), longer duration of complaints (B = 0.13; P &lt; 0.01), concomitant surgery (B = 14.40; P &lt; 0.01), and higher VAS pain scores at intake (B = 0.15; P &lt; 0.01) were associated with worse VAS pain scores postoperatively. Together, the variables explained 11% of the variance in mean VAS pain score at 3 months follow-up. Conclusions: This study confirms that surgical treatment for DQ significantly reduces patient-reported pain. Smoking, younger age, concomitant surgery, duration of complaints, and higher VAS pain scores at intake are associated with worse patient-reported pain 3 months after surgical release. However, the small effects suggest that these factors should not be considered the only important factors. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.</p

    Patient-Reported Outcomes and Function after Surgical Repair of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Thumb

    Get PDF
    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes of patients who underwent open thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair and to find risk factors associated with poor patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Patients undergoing open surgical repair for a complete thumb UCL rupture were included between December 2011 and February 2021. Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) total scores at baseline were compared to MHQ total scores at three and 12 months after surgery. Associations between the 12-month MHQ total score and several variables (i.e., sex, injury to surgery time, K-wire immobilization) were analyzed. Results: Seventy-six patients were included. From baseline to three and 12 months after surgery, patients improved significantly with a mean MHQ total score of 65 (standard deviation [SD] 15) to 78 (SD 14) and 87 (SD 12), respectively. We did not find any differences in outcomes between patients who underwent surgery in the acute (&lt;3 weeks) setting compared to a delayed setting (&lt;6 months). Conclusions: We found that patient-reported outcomes improve significantly at three and 12 months after open surgical repair of the thumb UCL compared to baseline. We did not find an association between injury to surgery time and lower MHQ total scores. This suggests that acute repair for full-thickness UCL tears might not always be necessary. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic II.</p

    Fasciocutaneous and jejunal free flaps for circumferential hypopharyngeal defect reconstruction:A 22-year multicenter cohort study

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether a tubed fasciocutaneous or jejunal free flap (FCFF and JFF) is preferable for reconstruction of circumferential pharyngolaryngoesophageal defects.METHODS: All consecutive patients with circumferential pharyngolaryngoesophageal defects reconstructed with an FCFF or JFF between 2000 and 2022 were included. Outcomes of interest were rates of fistulas, strictures, and donor-site complications.RESULTS: In total, 112 patients were included (35 FCFFs and 77 JFFs). Fistula and stricture rates were significantly lower following JFF compared to FCFF reconstructions, with 12% versus 34% (p = 0.008) and 29% versus 49% (p = 0.04), respectively. Severe donor-site complications leading to surgical intervention or ICU admittance only occurred after JFF reconstructions (18%, p = 0.007).CONCLUSIONS: The high fistula and stricture rates in FCFF reconstructions and the rate of severe abdominal complications in JFF reconstructions illustrate inherent procedure-specific advantages and disadvantages. Relative pros and cons should be carefully weighed when tailoring treatments to the individual needs of patients.</p

    Higher incidences of neuropathic pain and altered sensation following radial forearm free flap: A systematic review

    Get PDF
    Background: The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) has been used extensively for complex tissue defect reconstructions; however, the potential for significant donor-site morbidity remains a major drawback. Despite an abundance of literature on donor-site morbidities, no consensus has been reached on exact incidences of sensory morbidities that vary largely between 0% and 46%. Incidences of neuropathic pain in the donor site following RFFF still lack, even though clinical experience shows it often occurs. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to identify the incidence of neuropathic pain and altered sensation in the hand following harvesting of a RFFF. Methods: A systematic search was performed in multiple databases (Embase, Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). Studies from 1990 onwards that reported donor-site morbidities following harvest of the RFFF were included. Analyzed parameters included hand pain, hypoesthesia, cold intolerance, hyperesthesia, neuroma formation, paresthesia, sharp sensation loss, light sensation loss, and defect closure. Results: Of the 987 selected studies, 51 eligible articles were selected. The mean level of evidence was 3 (SD 0.6). Twenty articles reported pain as a donor-site morbidity, and the mean incidence of pain reported was 23% (SD 7.8). Hypoesthesia was reported by 37 articles and had a mean incidence of 34% (SD 25). Locations of pain and hypoesthesia included, amongst others, the area of the radial sensory nerve and the skin graft area. The mean incidences of cold intolerance and hyperesthesia were 13% (SD 13) and 16% (SD 15), respectively. Conclusion: The results of this systematic review suggest that 23% of all patients are dealing with neuropathic pain in the donor-site following harvest of an RFFF. Future studies should therefore focus on the prognostic factors and preventive measures of neuropathic pain to further improve clinical outcomes of this widely used flap

    Anatomy of the superficial radial nerve and its target nerves for targeted muscle reinnervation: an anatomical cadaver study

    Full text link
    BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a surgical procedure for treating symptomatic neuroma, in which the neuroma is removed and the proximal nerve stump is coapted to a donor motor branch innervating a nearby muscle. This study aimed to identify optimal motor targets for TMR of the Superficial Radial Nerve (SRN). METHODS: Seven cadaveric upper limbs were dissected to describe the course of the SRN in the forearm and motor nerve supply - number, length, diameter, and entry points in muscle of motor branches - for potential recipient muscles. RESULTS: The radial nerve provided three (3/6), two (2/6) or one (1/6) motor branches to the brachioradialis (BR) muscle, entering the muscle 21.7±17.9 to 10.8±15 mm proximal to the lateral epicondyle. One (1/7), two (3/7), three (2/7) or four (1/7) motor branches innervated the extensor carpi radialis longus (ERCL) muscle, with entry points 13.9±16.2 to 26.3±14.9 mm distal from the lateral epicondyle. In all specimens the posterior interosseous nerve gave off one motor branch to the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB), which divided in two or three secondary branches. The distal anterior interosseus nerve (AIN) was assessed as potential recipient for TMR coaptation and had a freely transferable length of 56.4±12.7 mm. CONCLUSIONS: When considering TMR for neuromas of the SRN in the distal third of the forearm and hand, the distal AIN is a suitable donor target. For neuromas of the SRN in the proximal two thirds of the forearm, the motor branches to the ERCL, ERCB, and BR are potential donor targets

    Cold-induced vasodilatation in cold-intolerant rats after nerve injury

    Full text link
    <p>Purpose: Cold-induced vasodilatation (CIVD) is a cyclic regulation of blood flow during prolonged cooling of protruding body parts. It is generally considered to be a protective mechanism against local cold injuries and cold intolerance after peripheral nerve injury. The aim of this study was to determine the role of the sympathetic system in initiating a CIVD response.</p><p>Methods: Eight rats were operated according to the spared nerve injury (SNI) model, eight underwent a complete sciatic lesion (CSL) and six underwent a sham operation. Prior to operation, 3, 6 and 9 weeks postoperatively, both hind limbs were cooled and the skin temperature was recorded to evaluate the presence of CIVD reactions. Cold intolerance was determined using the cold plate test and mechanical hypersensitivity measured using the Von Frey test.</p><p>Results: No significant difference in CIVD was found comparing the lateral operated hind limb for time (preoperatively and 3, 6 and 9 weeks postoperatively; p = 0.397) and for group (SNI, CSL and Sham; p = 0.695). SNI and CSL rats developed cold intolerance and mechanical hypersensitivity.</p><p>Conclusion: Our data show that the underlying mechanisms that initiate a CIVD reaction are not affected by damage to a peripheral nerve that includes the sympathetic fibres. We conclude that the sympathetic system does not play a major role in the initiation of CIVD in the hind limb of a rat.</p><p>Clinical relevance: No substantial changes in the CIVD reaction after peripheral nerve injury imply that the origin of cold intolerance after a traumatic nerve injury is initiated by local factors and has a more neurological cause. This is an important finding for future developing treatments for this common problem, as treatment focussing on vaso-regulation may not help diminish symptoms of cold-intolerant patients. (C) 2013 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</p>

    Prevention is better than cure: Surgical methods for neuropathic pain prevention following amputation – A systematic review

    Get PDF
    Background: Pain after amputation can be known as residual limb pain (RLP) or phantom limb pain (PLP); however, both can be disabling in daily life with reported incidences of 8% for finger amputations and up to 85% for major limb amputations. The current treatment is focused on reducing the pain after neuropathic pain occurs. However, surgical techniques to prevent neuropathic pain after amputation are available and effective, but they are underutilized. The purpose of the review is to investigate the effects of techniques during amputation to prevent neuropathic pain. Methods: A systematic review was performed in multiple databases (Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar) and following the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that reported surgical techniques to prevent neuropathic pain during limb amputation were included. Results: Of the 6188 selected studies, 13 eligible articles were selected. Five articles reported techniques for finger amputation: neurovascular island flap, centro-central union (CCU), and epineural ligatures, and flaps. For finger amputations, the use of prevention techniques resulted in a decrease of incidences from 8% to 0–3% with CCU being the most beneficial. For major limb amputations, the incidences for RLP were decreased to 0 to 55% with TMR and RPNI and compared to 64–91% for the control group. Eight articles reported techniques for amputations on major limbs: targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), targeted nerve implantation, concomitant nerve coaptation, and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI). Conclusions: Based on the current literature, we state that during finger and major limb amputation, the techniques to prevent neuropathic pain and PLP should be performed

    Two-, Three-, or Four-Corner Arthrodesis for Midcarpal Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Several limited midcarpal arthrodeses have been used in the treatment of midcarpal osteoarthritis as part of scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse. There is no consensus on whether two-carpal arthrodesis (2CA), three-carpal arthrodesis (3CA), bicolumnar arthrodesis, or four-carpal arthrodesis (FCA) results in the best outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in outcomes in patients undergoing FCA, 3CA, 2CA, or bicolumnar arthrodesis for midcarpal osteoarthritis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in multiple databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting the four surgical techniques were included. The primary outcomes were postoperative visual analog scale pain score, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, and the Mayo Wrist Score. The secondary outcomes were active range of motion, grip strength, and reported complications. Results: Of 2,270 eligible studies, 80 articles were selected, including a total of 2,166 wrists. The visual analog scale pain scores for both the 2CA and FCA groups reached an adequate pain reduction based on the Patient Acceptable Symptom Scale. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was also comparable between these two groups. The 2CA group also showed a significantly better active range of motion than the FCA group for both flexion-extension and radioulnar deviation arc. The incidence of nonunion was 6.9% in the FCA group compared with 10.0% in the 2CA group. Conclusions: Although the 2CA procedure has a theoretical advantage over the FCA method, the analysis of data showed that generally, these techniques have similar outcomes and complications. Therefore, both (2CA and FCA) are good options for midcarpal osteoarthritis in scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrists. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV
    corecore