Optimizing the integration of advanced practitioners in a department of surgery: An operational improvement model

Physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) have established themselves as key members of the healthcare team to supplement practicing physicians in patient care. PAs and NPs are collectively referred to as “advanced providers” (APs) and work not only in primary care but in general surgery and surgical subspecialties. Studies have addressed AP integration into the profession of medicine and have examined cost and efficacy of APs, attitudes about APs among residents, and educational impact of APs, but very little literature exists that describes a formalized approach to AP integration into a department of surgery, specifically with AP/resident integration. The purpose of this paper is to describe an initiative for developing an operational improvement model for APs working with residents on surgical inpatient services in a large academic health center. The model consists of four components and each component is described in detail from discovery state towards continuous improvement. Formal professional development opportunities for APs as well as appointing a Clinical Director for Surgical APs have positively impacted AP integration into the department of surgery

Preparedness for Residency: Now More Than Ever

Transitions in medical education, particularly the transition to residency training, are increasingly identified as meriting additional thought and care for the appropriate development of the new physician. In this issue of JAMA Surgery, Engelhardt and colleagues aptly demonstrate that a resident’s sense of preparedness for this transition plays a crucial role in their mental health; the identified association between resident preparedness and meaningful on-call experiences as students likely applies to most specialties requiring in-house call

Formulating the Triangle of Doom

Considerable attention has been paid in the CA literature to the glossing practices through which participants in conversation formulate who they are, what they are talking about, where the things they are talking about are located, and so forth. There are, of course, gestural glossing practices as well. For any concept or category presented gesturally, however, there is a range of possibilities from which a particular formulation may be adopted on any actual occasion of use. Identifying alternative formulations serves as a useful analytic exercise for exploring the pragmatic consequences of a produced gesture. In our own research, we have been studying the practices through which surgeons provide instruction while performing surgeries in a teaching hospital. We describe here a particular anatomy lesson produced during a surgery. The attending surgeon uses his hands and arms to gesturally construct a representation of a specific anatomic region (“the Triangle of Doom”) for the benefit of two medical students viewing and participating in the surgery. Employing the structure of Schegloff’s analysis of place formulations, we conduct an analysis of the attending’s gestural formulation. We will show how analyzing a particular gesture in this way illuminates both the intricate ways in which the gesture is tied to its context of production and the exquisite specificity of the gesture itself

The clinical behavior of mixed ductal/lobular carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To date, the clinical presentation and prognosis of mixed ductal/lobular mammary carcinomas has not been well studied, and little is known about the outcome of this entity. Thus, best management practices remain undetermined due to a dearth of knowledge on this topic.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In this paper, we present a clinicopathologic analysis of patients at our institution with this entity and compare them to age-matched controls with purely invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and historical data from patients with purely lobular carcinoma and also stain-available tumor specimens for E-cadherin. We have obtained 100 cases of ductal and 50 cases of mixed ductal/lobular breast carcinoma.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Clinically, the behavior of mixed ductal/lobular tumors seemed to demonstrate some important differences from their ductal counterparts, particularly a lower rate of metastatic spread but with a much higher rate of second primary breast cancers.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our data suggests that mixed ductal/lobular carcinomas are a distinct clinicopathologic entity incorporating some features of both lobular and ductal carcinomas and representing a pleomorphic variant of IDC.</p

The business of educating the next generation of surgeons

Surgical education community needs to be informed about how education is funded and how it is threatened. In order to explore these issues the Association of Surgical Education convened a panel with significant experience in managing surgery departments to discuss the business of surgical education. They specifically addressed methods to recognize and reward faculty, educate residents on safety, quality and cost, and increase departmental revenue. This information is important in the current educational environment where there is an increased need for institutions to find alternate revenue streams to sustain graduate medical education. It is also important to find additional revenue streams to fund new residency slots to accommodate the greater number medical students who have been admitted to medical schools in response to meet the projected shortage of physicians

“Show me the Data”: A Recipe for Quality Improvement Success in an Academic Surgical Department

Background Surgeons in academic medical centers have traditionally taken a siloed approach to reducing postoperative complications. We initiated a project focusing on transparency and sharing of data in order to engage surgeons in collaborative quality improvement. Its key features were the development of a comprehensive Department Quality Dashboard and the creation of a Clinical Operations Council that oversaw quality. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of those efforts. Study Design We compared inpatient outcomes before and after our intervention, allowing one quarter as the diffusion period. The outcomes analyzed were: risk-adjusted length of stay (LOS), mortality and direct cost and unadjusted incidence of complications and 30-day all-cause readmissions, as determined by the Vizient Clinical Database. We examined the outcomes of three groups: Group 1 (Surgery), Group 2 - all other surgical departments (Other Surgery) and Group 3 - all other patients (Non-Surgery). Two-tailed Students’s t-test was used for analysis and a p value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Group 1 demonstrated statistically significant improvements in mortality (p=0.01), LOS (p=0.002), cost (p=0.0001) and complications (p=0.02) while the all-cause readmission rate was unchanged, resulting in mean decrease of 0.55 LOS days and direct cost savings of $2300 per surgical admission. The comparison groups had only modest decreases in some of the analyzed outcomes and an increase in complication rates. Conclusions These data suggest that a collaborative, data-driven and transparent approach to assessing the quality of surgical care can yield significant improvements in patient outcomes

High‐speed Intraoperative Assessment of Breast Tumor Margins by Multimodal Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Tomography

Conventional methods for breast tumor margins assessment need a long turnaround time, which may lead to re‐operation for patients undergoing lumpectomy surgeries. Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) has been shown to visualize adipose tissue in small animals and human breast. Here, we demonstrate a customized multimodal ultrasound and PAT system for intraoperative breast tumor margins assessment using fresh lumpectomy specimens from 66 patients. The system provides the margin status of the entire excised tissue within 10 minutes. By subjective reading of three researchers, the results show 85.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 42.0% ‐ 99.2%] sensitivity and 84.6% (95% CI, 53.7% ‐ 97.3%) specificity, 71.4% (95% CI, 30.3% ‐ 94.9%) sensitivity and 92.3% (95% CI, 62.1% ‐ 99.6%) specificity, and 100% (95% CI, 56.1% ‐ 100%) sensitivity and 53.9% (95% CI, 26.1% ‐ 79.6%) specificity respectively when cross‐correlated with post‐operational histology. Furthermore, a machine learning‐based algorithm is deployed for margin assessment in the challenging ductal carcinoma in situ tissues, and achieved 85.5% (95% CI, 75.2% ‐ 92.2%) sensitivity and 90% (95% CI, 79.9% ‐ 95.5%) specificity. Such results present the potential of using mutlimodal ultrasound and PAT as a high‐speed and accurate method for intraoperative breast tumor margins evaluation

Are Surgeons Behind the Scientific Eight Ball: Delayed Acquisition of the NIH K08 Mentored Career Development Award

Background: Surgery residents complete their research training early in residency. Non-surgical trainees typically have research incorporated toward the last two years of their fellowship, conferring an advantage to apply for grants with recent research experience and preliminary data. Methods: The NIH RePORTER database was queried for K08 awardees trained in medicine, pediatrics, and surgery from 2013 to 2017. 406 K08 recipients were identified and time from completion of clinical training to achieving a K08 award was measured. Data were compared using ANOVA and expressed as mean. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Surgeons took longer to obtain a K08 than those trained in internal medicine (surgery = 3.7 years, internal medicine = 2.58 years p < 0.0001)). All K08 recipients without a PhD took longer to obtain a K08 than recipients with a PhD (MD = 3.50 years and MD/PhD = 2.42 years (p=<0.0001). Conclusions: Surgeons take longer to achieve a K08 award than clinicians trained in internal medicine, possibly due to an inherent disadvantage in training structure

A Competency-based Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Curriculum Significantly Improves General Surgery Residents’ Operative Performance and Decreases Skill Variability: Cohort Study

Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of implementing a CBE curriculum within a general surgery residency program and to evaluate its effectiveness in improving resident skill. Summary of Background Data: Operative skill variability affects residents and practicing surgeons and directly impacts patient outcomes. CBE can decrease this variability by ensuring uniform skill acquisition. We implemented a CBE LC curriculum to improve resident performance and decrease skill variability. Methods: PGY-2 residents completed the curriculum during monthly rotations starting in July 2017. Once simulator proficiency was reached, residents performed elective LCs with a select group of faculty at 3 hospitals. Performance at curriculum completion was assessed using LC simulation metrics and intraoperative operative performance rating system scores and compared to both baseline and historical controls, comprised of rising PGY-3s, using a 2-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test. PGY-2 group’s performance variability was compared with PGY-3s using Levene robust test of equality of variances; P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Twenty-one residents each performed 17.52 ± 4.15 consecutive LCs during the monthly rotation. Resident simulated and operative performance increased significantly with dedicated training and reached that of more experienced rising PGY-3s (n = 7) but with significantly decreased variability in performance (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Completion of a CBE rotation led to significant improvements in PGY-2 residents’ LC performance that reached that of PGY-3s and decreased performance variability. These results support wider implementation of CBE in resident training