Vulvovaginal yeast infections during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND Vulvovaginal yeast infections in pregnancy are common and can cause extensive inflammation, which could contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Symptomatic yeast infections are likely to cause more inflammation than asymptomatic. The objective of this study was to investigate associations between symptomatic and asymptomatic vulvovaginal yeast infections in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. METHODS We did a systematic review and searched eight databases until 01 July 2022. We included studies reporting on pregnant women with and without laboratory confirmed vulvovaginal yeast infection and preterm birth or eight other perinatal outcomes. We used random effects meta-analysis to calculate summary odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and prediction intervals for the association between yeast infection and outcomes. We described findings from studies with multivariable analyses. We assessed the risk of bias using published tools. RESULTS We screened 3909 references and included 57 studies. Only 22/57 studies reported information about participant vulvovaginal symptoms. Preterm birth was an outcome in 35/57 studies (49,161 women). In 32/35 studies with available data, the summary OR from univariable analyses was 1.01 (95% CI 0.84-1.21, I2 60%, prediction interval 0.45-2.23). In analyses stratified by symptom status, we found ORs of 1.44 (95% CI 0.92-2.26) in two studies with ≥ 50% symptomatic participants, 0.84 (95% CI 0.45-1.58) in seven studies with < 50% symptomatic participants, and 1.12 (95% CI 0.94-1.35) in four studies with asymptomatic participants. In three studies with multivariable analysis, adjusted ORs were greater than one but CIs were compatible with there being no association. We did not find associations between vulvovaginal yeast infection and any secondary outcome. Most studies were at high risk of bias in at least one domain and only three studies controlled for confounding. CONCLUSIONS We did not find strong statistical evidence of an increased risk for preterm birth or eight other adverse perinatal outcomes, in pregnant women with either symptomatic or asymptomatic vulvovaginal yeast infection. The available evidence is insufficient to make recommendations about testing and treatment of vulvovaginal yeast infection in pregnancy. Future studies should assess vulvovaginal symptoms, yeast organism loads, concomitant vaginal or cervical infections, and microbiota using state-of-the-art diagnostics. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020197564

Vulvovaginal yeast infections during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes : systematic review and meta-analysis

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS : All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article, its supplementary information files or can be obtained via request to the corresponding author.SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : ADDITIONAL FILE 1. Search strategy. Search terms used for the literature search in eight databases. ADDITIONAL FILE 2. REDCap data extraction forms. Data extraction forms on REDCap which were designed and used to extract data from published articles for our systematic review. ADDITIONAL FILE 3. Forest plots of stratified meta-analyses. Forest plots of meta-analyses about vulvovaginal yeast infection and preterm birth stratified by study design, diagnostic method used, income setting, and time of testing. ADDITIONAL FILE 4. Forest plots of secondary outcomes. Forest plots of meta-analyses about vulvovaginal yeast infection and spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, premature rupture of membranes, low birth weight, inflammation of the placenta or uterus. ADDITIONAL FILE 5. Summary of risk of bias assessment for cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, clinical trials, and case–control studies. ADDITIONAL FILE 6. Funnel plots of secondary outcomes preterm premature rupture of membranes and premature rupture of membranes.BACKGROUND : Vulvovaginal yeast infections in pregnancy are common and can cause extensive inflammation, which could contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Symptomatic yeast infections are likely to cause more inflammation than asymptomatic. The objective of this study was to investigate associations between symptomatic and asymptomatic vulvovaginal yeast infections in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. METHODS : We did a systematic review and searched eight databases until 01 July 2022. We included studies reporting on pregnant women with and without laboratory confirmed vulvovaginal yeast infection and preterm birth or eight other perinatal outcomes. We used random effects meta-analysis to calculate summary odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and prediction intervals for the association between yeast infection and outcomes. We described findings from studies with multivariable analyses. We assessed the risk of bias using published tools. RESULTS : We screened 3909 references and included 57 studies. Only 22/57 studies reported information about participant vulvovaginal symptoms. Preterm birth was an outcome in 35/57 studies (49,161 women). In 32/35 studies with available data, the summary OR from univariable analyses was 1.01 (95% CI 0.84–1.21, I2 60%, prediction interval 0.45–2.23). In analyses stratified by symptom status, we found ORs of 1.44 (95% CI 0.92–2.26) in two studies with ≥ 50% symptomatic participants, 0.84 (95% CI 0.45–1.58) in seven studies with < 50% symptomatic participants, and 1.12 (95% CI 0.94–1.35) in four studies with asymptomatic participants. In three studies with multivariable analysis, adjusted ORs were greater than one but CIs were compatible with there being no association. We did not find associations between vulvovaginal yeast infection and any secondary outcome. Most studies were at high risk of bias in at least one domain and only three studies controlled for confounding. CONCLUSIONS : We did not find strong statistical evidence of an increased risk for preterm birth or eight other adverse perinatal outcomes, in pregnant women with either symptomatic or asymptomatic vulvovaginal yeast infection. The available evidence is insufficient to make recommendations about testing and treatment of vulvovaginal yeast infection in pregnancy. Future studies should assess vulvovaginal symptoms, yeast organism loads, concomitant vaginal or cervical infections, and microbiota using state-of-the-art diagnostics.An MD-PhD scholarship from the Swiss National Science Foundation, a Swiss National Science Foundation, a Swiss government excellence scholarship and the SSPH + Global PhD Fellowship Programme in Public Health Sciences of the Swiss School of Public Health.https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.comam2024Medical MicrobiologySDG-03:Good heatlh and well-bein

Vulvovaginal yeast infections during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Vulvovaginal yeast infections in pregnancy are common and can cause extensive inflammation, which could contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Symptomatic yeast infections are likely to cause more inflammation than asymptomatic. The objective of this study was to investigate associations between symptomatic and asymptomatic vulvovaginal yeast infections in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. Methods: We did a systematic review and searched eight databases until 01 July 2022. We included studies reporting on pregnant women with and without laboratory confirmed vulvovaginal yeast infection and preterm birth or eight other perinatal outcomes. We used random effects meta-analysis to calculate summary odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and prediction intervals for the association between yeast infection and outcomes. We described findings from studies with multivariable analyses. We assessed the risk of bias using published tools. Results: We screened 3909 references and included 57 studies. Only 22/57 studies reported information about participant vulvovaginal symptoms. Preterm birth was an outcome in 35/57 studies (49,161 women). In 32/35 studies with available data, the summary OR from univariable analyses was 1.01 (95% CI 0.84–1.21, I 2 60%, prediction interval 0.45–2.23). In analyses stratified by symptom status, we found ORs of 1.44 (95% CI 0.92–2.26) in two studies with ≥ 50% symptomatic participants, 0.84 (95% CI 0.45–1.58) in seven studies with < 50% symptomatic participants, and 1.12 (95% CI 0.94–1.35) in four studies with asymptomatic participants. In three studies with multivariable analysis, adjusted ORs were greater than one but CIs were compatible with there being no association. We did not find associations between vulvovaginal yeast infection and any secondary outcome. Most studies were at high risk of bias in at least one domain and only three studies controlled for confounding. Conclusions: We did not find strong statistical evidence of an increased risk for preterm birth or eight other adverse perinatal outcomes, in pregnant women with either symptomatic or asymptomatic vulvovaginal yeast infection. The available evidence is insufficient to make recommendations about testing and treatment of vulvovaginal yeast infection in pregnancy. Future studies should assess vulvovaginal symptoms, yeast organism loads, concomitant vaginal or cervical infections, and microbiota using state-of-the-art diagnostics. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020197564

Inter-Specimen Imbalance of Mitochondrial Gene Copy Numbers Predicts Clustering of Pneumocystis jirovecii Isolates in Distinct Subgroups

The molecular detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii is an important therapy-relevant tool in microbiological diagnostics. However, the quantification of this pathogen in the past has revealed discordant results depending on the target gene. As the clinical variety of P. jirovecii infections ranges between life-threatening infections and symptom-free colonization, the question arises if qPCRs are reliable tools for quantitative diagnostics of P. jirovecii. P. jirovecii positive BALs were quantitatively tested for the copy numbers of one mitochondrial (COX-1) and two nuclear single-copy genes (KEX1 and DHPS) compared to the mitochondrial large subunit (mtLSU) by qPCR. Independent of the overall mtLSU copy number P. jirovecii clustered into distinct groups based on the ratio patterns of the respective qPCRs. This study, which compared different mitochondrial to nuclear gene ratio patterns of independent patients, shows that the mtLSU gene represents a highly sensitive qPCR tool for the detection of P. jirovecii, but does not display a reliable target for absolute quantification