30 research outputs found

    Purpose and criteria for blood smear scan, blood smear examination, and blood smear review.

    Get PDF
    A microscopic examination of an appropriately prepared and well-stained blood smear by a knowledgeable laboratory professional is necessary and clinically useful in a number of circumstances and for a variety of reasons. In this article, an attempt is made to delineate the purpose and criteria for blood smear examination in a variety of circumstances that are encountered in everyday laboratory hematology practice. A blood smear scan serves to at least (a) verify the flagged automated hematology results and (b) determine if a manual differential leukocyte count needs to be performed. Blood smear examination/manual differential leukocyte count with complete blood count (CBC) provides the complete hematologic picture of the case, at least from the morphologic standpoint. Blood smear review with or without interpretation serves to ensure that no clinically significant finding is missed, besides providing diagnosis or diagnostic clue(s), particularly if and when interpreted by a physician

    Is Hemoglobin Variant Analysis Helpful in the Diagnostic Work-up of Patients Revealing Microcytic Erythrocytosis on Complete Blood Count?

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Microcytic erythrocytosis is an abnormal CBC (complete blood count) finding that is under-recognized, poorly understood, and consequently under-utilized in patient care. It is characterized by decreased MCV and increased RBC count. Its etiology is likely multifactorial and includes thalassemias and hemoglobinopathies. The focus of our study was to determine the relative prevalence of hemoglobin-associated disorders in patients revealing microcytic erythrocytosis on CBC and to demonstrate whether or not hemoglobin variant analysis should be included in the diagnostic work-up of such cases

    Myeloid Sarcoma: Extramedullary Relapse After Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant for Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

    Get PDF
    Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is an extramedullary tumor of myeloid precursor cells, which can precede or occur concomitantly with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative neoplasms. Although MS can involve any organ, it is more common in the central nervous system (CNS) and gonads, sites known as “pharmacologic sanctuaries” where leukemic cells can survive despite systemic chemotherapy. Less often, this tumor can be the manner of relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The diagnosis is based on morphology and immunophenotype by either flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry of paraffin-embedded tissue, and confirmed by FISH or molecular studies. Myeloid sarcomas usually express the leukocyte common antigens CD45, CD13, CD33, CD43 and lack T-cell and B-cell antigens

    Aberrant expression of CD56 on granulocytes and monocytes in myeloproliferative neoplasm and myelodysplastic syndrome

    Get PDF
    Conclusions: Aberrant CD56 expression on granulocytes is seen in all aubtypes MPN and high grade MDS. CD56 expression in MPN correlated with bone marrow morphology, BCR/ABL transcript, and bone marrow engraftment study following treatment. Identification of abnormal CD56+ granulocytes and monocytes is helpful in both the initial diagnosis and long-term follow up of patients with MPN and MDS

    Mitochondrial and glycolytic metabolic compartmentalization in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

    No full text
    Metabolic heterogeneity between neoplastic cells and surrounding stroma has been described in several epithelial malignancies; however, the metabolic phenotypes of neoplastic lymphocytes and neighboring stroma in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is unknown. We investigated the metabolic phenotypes of human DLBCL tumors by using immunohistochemical markers of glycolytic and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) metabolism. The lactate importer MCT4 is a marker of glycolysis, whereas the lactate importer MCT1 and TOMM20 are markers of OXPHOS metabolism. Staining patterns were assessed in 33 DLBCL samples as well as 18 control samples (non-neoplastic lymph nodes). TOMM20 and MCT1 were highly expressed in neoplastic lymphocytes, indicating an OXPHOS phenotype, whereas non-neoplastic lymphocytes in the control samples did not express these markers. Stromal cells in DLBCL samples strongly expressed MCT4, displaying a glycolytic phenotype, a feature not seen in stromal elements of non-neoplastic lymphatic tissue. Furthermore, the differential expression of lactate exporters (MCT4) on tumor-associated stroma and lactate importers (MCT1) on neoplastic lymphocytes support the hypothesis that neoplastic cells are metabolically linked to the stroma likely via mutually beneficial reprogramming. MCT4 is a marker of tumor-associated stroma in neoplastic tissue. Our findings suggest that disruption of neoplastic-stromal cell metabolic heterogeneity including MCT1 and MCT4 blockade should be studied to determine if it could represent a novel treatment target in DLBCL
    corecore