Assessing the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation and probiotic VSL#3 for active ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND:Fecal microbiota transplantation is an effective treatment for many gastrointestinal diseases, such as Clostridium difficile infection and inflammatory bowel disease, especially ulcerative colitis. Changes in colonic microflora may play an important role in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis, and improvements in the intestinal microflora may relieve the disease. Fecal bacterial transplants and oral probiotics are becoming important ways to relieve active ulcerative colitis. PURPOSE:This systematic review with meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of basic treatment combined with fecal microbiota transplantation or mixed probiotics therapy in relieving mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. METHODS:The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries (updated September 2019) were searched to identify randomized, placebo-controlled, or head-to-head trials assessing fecal microbiota transplantation or probiotic VSL#3 as induction therapy in active ulcerative colitis. We analyze data using the R program to obtain evidence of direct comparison and to generate intermediate variables for indirect treatment comparisons. RESULTS:Seven randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were used as the sources of the induction data. All treatments were superior to placebo. In terms of clinical remission and clinical response to active ulcerative colitis, direct comparisons showed fecal microbiota transplantation (OR = 3.47, 95% CI = 1.93-6.25) (OR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.18-5.21) and mixed probiotics VSL#3 (OR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.49-3.88) (OR = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.53-6.25) to have better effects than the placebo. Indirect comparison showed fecal microbiota transplantation and probiotic VSL#3 did not reach statistical significance either in clinical remission (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.70-2.06) or clinical response (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.62-1.45). In terms of safety, fecal microbiota transplantation (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.51-2.61) and VSL #3 (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.33-2.49) showed no statistically significant increase in adverse events compared with the control group. In terms of serious adverse events, there was no statistical difference between the fecal microbiota transplantation group and the control group (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.46-3.57). The probiotics VSL#3 seems more safer than fecal microbiota transplantation, because serious adverse events were not reported in the VSL#3 articles. CONCLUSIONS:Fecal microbiota transplantation or mixed probiotics VSL#3 achieved good results in clinical remission and clinical response in active ulcerative colitis, and there was no increased risk of adverse reactions. There was no statistical difference between the therapeutic effect of fecal microbiota transplantation and that of mixed probiotics VSL#3. However, the use of fecal microbiota transplantation and probiotics still has many unresolved problems in clinical applications, and more randomized controlled trials are required to confirm its efficacy

Targeting Hippo pathway: A novel strategy for Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric cancer treatment

The Hippo pathway plays an important role in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation; it is a crucial regulatory pathway in organ development and tumor growth. Infection with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) increases the risk of developing gastric cancer. In recent years, significant progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms by which H. pylori infection promotes the development and progression of gastric cancer via the Hippo pathway. Exploring the Hippo pathway molecules may yield new diagnostic and therapeutic targets for H. pylori-induced gastric cancer. The current article reviews the composition and regulatory mechanism of the Hippo pathway, as well as the research progress of the Hippo pathway in the occurrence and development of H. pylori-related gastric cancer, in order to provide a broader perspective for the study and prevention of gastric cancer

The role of intestinal flora on tumor immunotherapy: recent progress and treatment implications

Immunotherapy, specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors, has emerged as a promising approach for treating malignant tumors. The gut, housing approximately 70 % of the body's immune cells, is abundantly populated with gut bacteria that actively interact with the host's immune system. Different bacterial species within the intestinal flora are in a delicate equilibrium and mutually regulate each other. However, when this balance is disrupted, pathogenic microorganisms can dominate, adversely affecting the host's metabolism and immunity, ultimately promoting the development of disease. Emerging researches highlight the potential of interventions such as fecal microflora transplantation (FMT) to improve antitumor immune response and reduce the toxicity of immunotherapy. These remarkable findings suggest the major role of intestinal flora in the development of cancer immunotherapy and led us to the hypothesis that intestinal flora transplantation may be a new breakthrough in modifying immunotherapy side effects

Helicobacter pylori-induced aberrant demethylation and expression of GNB4 promotes gastric carcinogenesis via the Hippo–YAP1 pathway

Abstract Background Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection causes aberrant DNA methylation and contributes to the risk of gastric cancer (GC). Guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit beta-4 (GNB4) is involved in various tumorigenic processes. We found an aberrant methylation level of GNB4 in H. pylori-induced GC in our previous bioinformatic analysis; however, its expression and underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Methods The expression, underlying signaling pathways, and clinical significance of GNB4 were analyzed in a local cohort of 107 patients with GC and several public databases. H. pylori infection was induced in in vitro and in vivo models. Methylation-specific PCR, pyrosequencing, and mass spectrometry analysis were used to detect changes in methylation levels. GNB4, TET1, and YAP1 were overexpressed or knocked down in GC cell lines. We performed gain- and loss-of-function experiments, including CCK-8, EdU, colony formation, transwell migration, and invasion assays. Nude mice were injected with genetically manipulated GC cells, and the growth of xenograft tumors and metastases was measured. Real-time quantitative PCR, western blotting, immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and co-immunoprecipitation experiments were performed to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms. Results GNB4 expression was significantly upregulated in GC and correlated with aggressive clinical characteristics and poor prognosis. Increased levels of GNB4 were associated with shorter survival times. Infection with H. pylori strains 26695 and SS1 induced GNB4 mRNA and protein expression in GC cell lines and mice. Additionally, silencing of GNB4 blocked the pro-proliferative, metastatic, and invasive ability of H. pylori in GC cells. H. pylori infection remarkably decreased the methylation level of the GNB4 promoter region, particularly at the CpG#5 site (chr3:179451746–179451745). H. pylori infection upregulated TET1 expression via activation of the NF-κB. TET binds to the GNB4 promoter region which undergoes demethylation modification. Functionally, we identified that GNB4 induced oncogenic behaviors of tumors via the Hippo–YAP1 pathway in both in vitro and in vivo models. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that H. pylori infection activates the NF-κB-TET1-GNB4 demethylation-YAP1 axis, which may be a potential therapeutic target for GC