Lung cancer specialists' opinions on treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A multidisciplinary survey

Purpose: The current standard of care for surgically eligible stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgical resection, but emerging data suggest that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is potentially as effective as surgery. However, specialist views of the current evidence about SBRT and how they would incorporate a randomized controlled trial (RCT) into practice is unclear. We sought to understand specialist opinions about evidence regarding treatment of stage I NSCLC and how this translates into practice and clinical trial implementation. Methods and materials: We used a 28-item, web-based survey that invited all participating providers from the American Society for Radiation Oncology, American Thoracic Society Thoracic Oncology Assembly, and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer to share opinions regarding practice beliefs, treatment of stage I NSCLC, and a clinical trial scenario. Results: A total of 959 surveys were completed; 64% were from radiation oncologists (ROs) and 49% were from outside the United States. The majority of ROs (80%) reported that current evidence indicates that SBRT has the same or a better benefit compared with surgery for surgically eligible patients with stage I NSCLC; 28% of non–radiation oncologists (NROs) indicated the same (P < .01). Almost all ROs (94%), compared with 62% of NROs, would permit surgically eligible patients to enroll in an RCT of SBRT versus surgery (P < .01). Most ROs (82%) and NROs (87%) believed that changing practice in thoracic surgery would be somewhat difficult, very difficult, or impossible (P = .066) even if an RCT showed better survival with SBRT. Conclusions: NROs believe that SBRT is much less effective than surgery, contrary to ROs, who believe that they are similar. Most would support an RCT, but NROs would do so less. Changes in surgical practice may be challenging even if an RCT shows better mortality and quality of life with SBRT. These results are helpful in the creation and dissemination of RCTs that are designed to understand this question

Brief Report: Severe Pneumonitis After Combined Thoracic Radiotherapy and Osimertinib

Introduction: Osimertinib is an effective treatment for metastatic NSCLC. Occasionally, thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) is delivered to patients receiving osimertinib to treat residual or progressing pulmonary tumors. Anecdotal reports suggest that the delivery of TRT in combination with osimertinib may be associated with a high risk of severe pneumonitis. Methods: A retrospective study was performed at a single academic medical center in the United States to investigate the incidence of severe pneumonitis among patients treated with combined TRT and osimertinib between June 2016 and December 2021. Baseline patient characteristics, tumor size and location, and dosimetric parameters were evaluated. The highest grade of radiation pneumonitis that developed within 6 months of treatment was scored in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Results: A total of 16 patients were identified who were treated with combined TRT and osimertinib. All had a diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC. Treatment-related grade greater than or equal to 2 pneumonitis developed in 56%, grade greater than or equal to 3 in 37.5%, and grade 4 in 6.3%; no patient developed grade 5 pneumonitis. Median time to any-grade pneumonitis was 29 days (1–84 d); all patients had symptom resolution with expectant management or oral steroid therapies. All patients discovered to have grade greater than or equal to 3 pneumonitis (n = 6) received TRT to tumors located within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree, including tumors abutting the proximal bronchial tree (n = 2) and within the mediastinum (n = 1). Conclusions: The combination of TRT with osimertinib was associated with a high rate of severe pneumonitis that required oral steroid medications. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings and to understand the clinical and treatment factors that influence this risk and how they can be mitigated

Use and Outcomes of SBRT for Early Stage NSCLC Without Pathologic Confirmation in the Veterans Health Care Administration

Purpose: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) use has increased among patients without pathologic confirmation (PC) of lung cancer. Empirical SBRT without PC raises concerns about variation in workup and patient selection, but national trends have not been well described. In this study, we assessed patterns of empirical SBRT use, workup, and causes of death among a large national non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohort. Methods and Materials: We identified 2221 patients treated with SBRT for cT1-T2aN0M0 NSCLC in the Veterans Affairs health care system from 2008 to 2015. We reviewed their pretreatment workup and assessed associations between absence of PC and clinical and demographic factors. We compared causes of death between PC and non-PC groups and used Cox proportional hazards modeling to compare overall survival and lung cancer specific survival (LCSS) between these groups. Results: Treatment without PC varied from 0% to 61% among Veterans Affairs medical centers, with at least 5 cases of stage I NSCLC. Overall, 14.9% of patients were treated without PC and 8.8% did not have a biopsy attempt. Ten percent of facilities were responsible for almost two-thirds (62%) of cases of treatment without PC. Of non-PC patients, 95.5% had positron emission tomography scans, 40.6% had biopsy procedures attempted, and 12.7% underwent endobronchial ultrasound. Non-PC patients were more likely to have cT1 tumors and live outside the histoplasmosis belt. Age, sex, smoking status, and Charlson comorbidity index were similar between groups. Lung cancer was the most common cause of death in both groups. Overall survival was similar between groups, whereas non-PC patients had better LCSS (hazard ratio = 0.77, P = .031). Conclusions: Empirical SBRT use varied widely among institutions and appropriate radiographic workup was consistently used in this national cohort. Future studies should investigate determinants of variation and reasons for higher LCSS among non-PC patients