The EU as a security provider

This Clingendael Report addresses the question of how the EU as a security provider should further adapt to the changing security environment. First, it deals with the question of developing further policy in response to the external-internal security nexus, looking in particular at the consequences for the actors involved. Based on this central question the impact on three specific areas has been analysed: the comprehensive approach in EU crisis management; capability development and the defence industry. In all three cases the follow-on work to the December 2013 European Council on Defence takes a prominent place

Spearheading European Defence:Employing the Lisbon Treaty for a Stronger CSDP

It is now more urgent than ever that the EU delivers as a security provider in an increasingly complex and insecure environment. This report assesses to what extent the provisions that were introduced with the Lisbon Treaty could contribute to spearheading the CSDP. This includes Articles 42.6 and 46 on Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), Article 44 on groups of states taking the lead on operations, as well as Article 42.7 on mutual assistance – the latter having recently been invoked by France. The articles can be instrumental in circumventing some of the CSDP’s bottlenecks by offering more political and operational flexibility; increase the potential for attaining more relevant capabilities and a broadening of the CSDP’s purpose to fit today’s security challenges. Although all member states share the assessment that a more credible role for the EU in security and defence requires more cooperation, not all of them are willing to act on it. Therefore, flexible formats of groups of countries that choose to work together more closely or on a faster time scale are inescapable