ESHAP and G-CSF is a superior blood stem cell mobilizing regimen compared to cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m−2 and G-CSF for pre-treated lymphoma patients: a matched pairs analysis of 78 patients

Cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m−2followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilizing regimen, but has limited anti-lymphoma activity. We therefore assessed the mobilizing potential of ESHAP (etoposide, ara-C, methylprednisolone and cisplatin), a potent second-line lymphoma regimen followed by G-CSF. The results were compared in 78 patients with relapsed or resistant lymphomas with the use of cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m−2followed by G-CSF in a matched pairs analysis, matching the ESHAP recipients (for predetermined prognostic factors) from a cohort of 178 lymphoma patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. The total numbers of mononuclear cells collected at apheresis was similar with both regimens but ESHAP plus G-CSF resulted in a significantly higher percentage of CD34+ cells, absolute number of CD34+ cells and GM-CFC (all with P -values < 0.001). The number of patients requiring only one apheresis harvest to achieve a CD34+ cell yield of > 2.0 × 106kg−1was greatly increased in the ESHAP recipients (56/78 vs 17/78, P< 0.001). The total number of progenitor cells collected was not significantly different with the two mobilization regimens because of this higher number of apheresis in the cyclophosphamide group. The proportion of patients who failed to achieve a minimum CD34+ cell target of 1 × 106kg−1with the pooled harvests was less in the ESHAP arm (four patients vs nine patients) despite an increased number of aphereses in the cyclophosphamide recipients. ESHAP plus G-CSF is well tolerated and is an excellent mobilization regimen in patients with pre treated lymphoma. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaig

In vitro nuclear interactome of the HIV-1 Tat protein

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>One facet of the complexity underlying the biology of HIV-1 resides not only in its limited number of viral proteins, but in the extensive repertoire of cellular proteins they interact with and their higher-order assembly. HIV-1 encodes the regulatory protein Tat (86–101aa), which is essential for HIV-1 replication and primarily orchestrates HIV-1 provirus transcriptional regulation. Previous studies have demonstrated that Tat function is highly dependent on specific interactions with a range of cellular proteins. However they can only partially account for the intricate molecular mechanisms underlying the dynamics of proviral gene expression. To obtain a comprehensive nuclear interaction map of Tat in T-cells, we have designed a proteomic strategy based on affinity chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Our approach resulted in the identification of a total of 183 candidates as Tat nuclear partners, 90% of which have not been previously characterised. Subsequently we applied <it>in silico </it>analysis, to validate and characterise our dataset which revealed that the Tat nuclear interactome exhibits unique signature(s). First, motif composition analysis highlighted that our dataset is enriched for domains mediating protein, RNA and DNA interactions, and helicase and ATPase activities. Secondly, functional classification and network reconstruction clearly depicted Tat as a polyvalent protein adaptor and positioned Tat at the nexus of a densely interconnected interaction network involved in a range of biological processes which included gene expression regulation, RNA biogenesis, chromatin structure, chromosome organisation, DNA replication and nuclear architecture.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We have completed the <it>in vitro </it>Tat nuclear interactome and have highlighted its modular network properties and particularly those involved in the coordination of gene expression by Tat. Ultimately, the highly specialised set of molecular interactions identified will provide a framework to further advance our understanding of the mechanisms of HIV-1 proviral gene silencing and activation.</p

Progenitor cell mobilisation - Cyclophosphamide, etoposide and G-CSF to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma

We aimed to assess the effectiveness of cyclophosphamide, etoposide and G-CSF (C+E) to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma. A matched cohort study was performed comparing patients mobilized with C+E to patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF (C alone). Patients were matched for disease, prior radiotherapy and a chemotherapy score reflecting the amount and type of prior chemotherapy. Thirty-eight consecutive patients mobilized with C+E were compared with 38 matched controls. C+E was equivalent to C alone in terms of numbers of patients achieving a minimum threshold of greater than or equal to2 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells (82% vs 79%, P = 0.74). C+E was superior, however, in terms of total CD34(+) yield (6.35 vs 3.3 x 10(6)/kg, P < 0.01), achieving a target graft of greater than or equal to5 x 10(6)/kg (55% vs 34%, P = 0.04) and obtaining both a minimum (61% vs 32%, P < 0.01) and target (45% vs 13%, P < 0.01) graft in one apheresis. This superiority was largely confined to patients with lower chemotherapy scores. There was no difference in neutrophil and platelet recovery or transfusion requirements for those who subsequently received high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation. Thus, C+E improves the efficiency of peripheral blood stem cell collection, but does not increase the number of patients who can proceed to transplantation. Most of the benefit of the regimen was confined to patients who had not received extensive prior therapy. Novel strategies are required to increase the collection efficiency of 'hard to mobilize' patients