5 research outputs found
Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach?
Introduction: The following research questions were answered: (1) What are the training pathways followed by the current robot professionals? (2) Are there any differences between the surgical specialties in robot training and robot use? (3) What is their opinion about multidisciplinary basic skills training? Methods: An online questionnaire was sent to 91 robot professionals in The Netherlands. The questionnaire contained 21 multiple-choice questions focusing on demographics, received robot training, and their opinion on basic skills training in robotic surgery. Results: The response rate was 62 % (n = 56): 13 general surgeons, 16 gynecologists, and 27 urologists. The urologists performed significantly more robotic procedures than surgeons and gynecologists. The kind of training of all professionals varied from a training program by Intuitive Surgical, master-apprenticeship with or without duo console, fellowship, and self-designed training programs. The training did neither differ significantly among the different specialties nor the year of starting robotic surgery. Majority of respondents favor an obliged training program including an examination for the basics of robot skills training. Conclusion: Training of the current robot professionals is mostly dependent on local circumstances and the manufacturer of the robot system. Training is independent of the year of start with robotic surgery and speciality. To guarantee the quality of future training of residents and fellows in robot-assisted surgery, clear training goals should be formulated and implemented. Since this study shows that current training of different specialities does not differ, training in robotic surgery could be started by a multidisciplinary basic skills training and assessment
Factors influencing health-related quality of life after gastrectomy for cancer
_Aim:_ Insight in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) may improve clinical decision making and inform patients about the long-term effects of gastrectomy. This study aimed to evaluate and identify factors associated with HRQoL after gastrectomy.
_Methods:_ This cross-sectional study used prospective databases from seven Dutch centers (2001–2015) including patients who underwent gastrectomy for cancer. Between July 2015 and November 2016, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer HRQoL questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 were sent to all surviving patients without recurrence. The QLQ-C30 scores were compared to a Dutch reference population using a one-sample t test. Spearman’s rank test was used to correlate time after surgery to HRQoL, and multivariable linear regression was performed to identify factors associated with HRQoL.
_Results:_ A total of 222 of 274 patients completed the questionnaires. Median follow-up was 29 months and 86.9% of patients had a follow-up >1 year. The majority of patients had undergone neoadjuvant treatme
Multicentre study of non-surgical management of diverticulitis with abscess formation
Background: Treatment strategies for diverticulitis with abscess formation have shifted from (emergency) surgical treatment to non-surgical management (antibiotics with or without percutaneous
drainage (PCD)). The aim was to assess outcomes of non-surgical treatment and to identify risk factors
for adverse outcomes.
Methods: Patients with a first episode of CT-diagnosed diverticular abscess (modified Hinchey Ib or II)
between January 2008 and January 2015 were included retrospectively, if initially treated non-surgically.
Baseline characteristics, short-term (within 30 days) and long-term treatment outcomes were recorded.
Treatment failure was a composite outcome of complications (perforation, colonic obstruction and fistula
formation), readmissions, persistent diverticulitis, emergency surgery, death, or need for PCD in the
no-PCD group. Regression analyses were used to analyse risk factors for treatment failure, recurrences
and surgery.
Results: Overall, 447 patients from ten hospitals were included (Hinchey Ib 215; Hinchey II 232), with a
median follow-up of 72 (i.q.r. 55–93) months. Most patients were treated without PCD (332 of 447,
74â‹…3 per cent). Univariable analyses, stratified by Hinchey grade, showed no differences between no PCD
and PCD in short-term treatment failure (Hinchey I: 22â‹…3 versus 33 per cent, P = 0â‹…359; Hinchey II: 25â‹…9
versus 36 per cent, P = 0â‹…149) or emergency surgery (Hinchey I: 5â‹…1 versus 6 per
Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer, a multicenter prospectively randomized controlled trial (LOGICA-trial)
Background: For gastric cancer patients, surgical resection with en-bloc lymphadenectomy is the cornerstone of curative treatment. Open gastrectomy has long been the preferred surgical approach worldwide. However, this procedure is associated with considerable morbidity. Several meta-analyses have shown an advantage in short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy compared to open procedures, with similar oncologic outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether the results of these Asian studies can be extrapolated to the Western population. In this trial from the Netherlands, patients with resectable gastric cancer will be randomized to laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. Methods: The study is a non-blinded, multicenter, prospectively randomized controlled superiority trial. Patients (≥18 years) with histologically proven, surgically resectable (cT1-4a, N0-3b, M0) gastric adenocarcinoma and European Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2 are eligible to participate in the study after obtaining informed consent. Patients (n = 210) will be included in one of the ten participating Dutch centers and are randomized to either laparoscopic or open gastrectomy. The primary outcome is postoperative hospital stay (days). Secondary outcome parameters include postoperative morbidity and mortality, oncologic outcomes, readmissions, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Discussion: In this randomized controlled trial laparoscopic and open gastrectomy are compared in patients with resectable gastric cancer. It is expected that laparoscopic gastrectomy will result in a faster recovery of the patient and a shorter hospital stay. Secondly, it is expected that laparoscopic gastrectomy will be associated with a lower postoperative morbidity, less readmissions, higher cost-effectiveness, better postoperative quality of life, but with similar mortality and oncologic outcomes, compared to open gastrectomy. The study started on 1 December 2014. Inclusion and follow-up will take 3 and 5 years respectively. Short-term results will be analyzed and published after discharge of the last randomized patient