Nailed connection behavior in light-frame wood shear walls with an intermediate layer of insulation

The shear strength and stiffness of light-frame wood shear walls is highly dependent on the behavior of their individual nailed connections. Eighty-four nailed connection specimens were tested under shear loading to determine the effect of including rigid insulation as an intermediate material between the sheathing and framing elements in a light-frame wood shear wall. Each specimen contained common 10d or 16d nails, 15.9 mm oriented strandboard sheathing, spruce-pine-fir lumber, and rigid insulation in varied thicknesses between 0 and 38.1 mm. From the load-deformation results, maximum load, yield load, and stiffness were assessed using curve-fitting and yield-point determination methods. The results indicate that, as the insulation thickness increases, the connection strength and stiffness both exhibit a steep reduction. In addition, nonlinear two-dimensional (2D) finite-element models of the same nailed connections were developed. These models showed good correlation with experimental data and served to confirm that the decline in strength and stiffness observed in the tests is due to the introduction of the insulation

Testing and analytical modelling of intermediate gypsum wallboard in wood shear wall sheathing to framing connections

Light frame wood shear walls resist lateral loads primarily through the individual nailed connections between the sheathing and framing. The most common arrangement for such shear walls is to have sheathing on one side and gypsum board on the other. In various situations it can be desirable to increase the capacity of this type of walls by fastening a layer of sheathing overtop of the drywall. This study considered the effect that an intermediate layer of gypsum has on the strength of nailed connections in shear walls, while maintaining code-defined minimum nail penetrations. Results show that intermediate gypsum placed between the sheathing and framing resulted in significantly reduced capacity and stiffness. Analytical modelling showed good correlation with experimental results. The implications of the experimental testing and modelling are that code provisions allowing the use of intermediate gypsum wallboard should not be relied upon