Clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma: differentiation of distinct histological types with multiphase CT

PURPOSEConventional clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) have different behavioral characteristics and clinical management strategies (nephrectomy vs. nephron-sparing surgery). Our aim was to retrospectively evaluate the contrast enhancement pattern of ccRCC and pRCC and evaluate its possible diagnostic role for preoperative differentiation using a standardized protocol.MATERIALS AND METHODSQuadriphasic multidetector computed tomography (CT) images (unenhanced, corticomedullary, nephrographic, and excretory phases) of 19 patients with 20 ccRCC and 14 patients with 15 pRCC lesions (mean ages, 62.3±14.1 and 61.4±13.7 years, respectively) were reviewed retrospectively. The attenuation characteristics were compared with the attenuation of the normal renal cortex using either multiple 10 mm2 regions of interest or whole tumor attenuation measurements. The degree of contrast enhancement was also compared.RESULTSUnivariate analysis revealed that ccRCC lesions showed higher mean attenuation values on the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases compared with pRCC masses (P < 0.05) using both measurement techniques.CONCLUSIONThe findings underscore the importance of multiphase CT in the differentiation of these two subtypes of RCC using standard assessment techniques. The measurement of the degree of enhancement on contrast-enhanced multidetector CT may be a simple and useful method to radiologically differentiate between the two histological types of RCC

Transitional cell and clear cell renal carcinoma: differentiation of distinct histological types with multiphase CT

BACKGROUND: Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) may mimic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) when it develops in a similar location, therefore, differentiation with imaging techniques might be challenging. Preoperative differentiation may have a significant role indicating the type of surgical treatment (nephrectomy vs. ureteronephrectomy). PURPOSE: To retrospectively analyze the differences in the contrast enhancement of TCC and RCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Images of 20 RCC and 12 TCC (mean ages, 62.3 +/- 14.1 and 67.4 +/- 12.0 years, respectively) were analyzed from patients who underwent multiphase computed tomography (CT) examinations following 1.5 mL/kg non-ionic contrast agent administration. Unenhanced corticomedullary (30-45 s), nephrographic (70-90 s), and excretory (300-480 s) phases were imaged. The attenuation characteristics of RCC and TCC were compared to the attenuation of the normal renal cortex. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the attenuation ratios between RCC or TCC in the corticomedullary (P = 0.040) and nephrographic (P = 0.004) phases using three regions of interest (ROIs) of 10 mm2 size. If measuring ROIs comprising the complete tumor lesion instead of three small ROIs, no significant difference was observed in the attenuation ratios between RCC in TCC in any phases. CONCLUSION: Our study reports significant attenuation differences between RCC and TCC in the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases by multiphase CT. The findings underscore the importance of multiphase CT in the differentiation of these two different entities. Using multiple small (three) ROIs is more accurate than measuring the whole tumor attenuation