Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic factor in patients during palliative treatment of pancreatic ductal adeoncarcinoma with FOLFIRINOX regimen

Introduction. Difficulties in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment require constant search of novel prognostic factors. The aim of this study is to determine the role of various morphological parameters in predicting prognosis of advanced PDAC during systemic therapy with FOLFIRINOX regimen. Material and methods. Data of 52 patients, treated with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy due to metastatic PDAC were analyzed retrospectively in this study. Results. Median time of overall survival (OS) in group of patients with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3 was 5.8 months, compared to 14.5 months in patients with NLR < 3. Median progression free survival (PFS) in patients with NLR ≥ 3 was 4.1 months, compared to 8.5 months in patients with NLR < 3. There were no statistically significant differences among patients concerning lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Conclusions. Higher NLR is a negative prognostic factor in metastatic PDAC

Immunotherapy or targeted therapy as first-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma with the BRAF mutation — a single-center analysis

Introduction. One of the most important achievements of contemporary oncology is the discovery of new therapeutic possibilities: targeted therapy and immunotherapy associated with checkpoint inhibitors. It has not been unequivocally determined so far which therapy should be used as first-line treatment in patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma with the BRAF mutation. Material and methods. 137 patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma with the BRAF mutation were analyzed. They received anti-PD1-1 therapy (IT) or molecularly targeted therapy iBRAF ± iMEK (TT) as first-line treatment in the scope of the national drug program. IT and TT therapies used as first-line treatment were compared. Results. Median OS and PFS in the group were 14.0 and 7.3 months. Unfavorable prognostic factors for OS and PFS were metastases to the central nervous system, increased LDH levels and performance status > 1. Metastatic sites in > 2 locations were only unfavorable prognostic factors for OS. A statistically significant difference was found between TT and IT for OS (p = 0.0011; median for TT was 12.6 months and was not reached for IT). It should be noted that the group treated with TT was characterized by a worse prognostic factors. No differences in PFS were observed (p = 0.292, medians 7.2 and 9.0 months, respectively). Conclusion. In patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma with a BRAF mutation without rapid progression, IT should be considered as first-line therapy.Introduction. One of the most important achievements of contemporary oncology is the discovery of new therapeutic possibilities: targeted therapy and immunotherapy associated with checkpoint inhibitors. It has not been unequivocally determined so far which therapy should be used as first-line treatment in patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma with the BRAF mutation. Material and methods. 137 patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma with the BRAF mutation were analyzed. They received anti-PD1-1 therapy (IT) or molecularly targeted therapy iBRAF ± iMEK (TT) as first-line treatment in the scope of the national drug program. IT and TT therapies used as first-line treatment were compared. Results. Median OS and PFS in the group were 14.0 and 7.3 months. Unfavorable prognostic factors for OS and PFS were metastases to the central nervous system, increased LDH levels and performance status > 1. Metastatic sites in > 2 locations were only unfavorable prognostic factors for OS. A statistically significant difference was found between TT and IT for OS (p = 0.0011; median for TT was 12.6 months and was not reached for IT). It should be noted that the group treated with TT was characterized by a worse prognostic factors. No differences in PFS were observed (p = 0.292, medians 7.2 and 9.0 months, respectively). Conclusion. In patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma with a BRAF mutation without rapid progression, IT should be considered as first-line therapy

Complications of palliative antiangiogenic therapy in patients with colorectal cancer

Introduction: Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic drug used in the therapy of numerous solid tumours including colorectal adenocarcinoma. The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab has been demonstrated in many multicenter clinical trials. The scope of this paper is to analyze the safety profile of bevacizumab in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. Aim of the study: Analysis of toxicity and safety of the treatment with bevacizumab patients with colorectal cancer in the metastatic stage. Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records of 42 patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated in the Department of Systemic and Generalized Malignancies, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Institute of Oncology, Kraków Branch, in the period 2007–2014. Results: The median time of treatment with bevacizumab was 6 months. The median duration of progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.5 months. Toxicity of treatment with bevacizumab affected 43 percent of patients. The most common adverse events observed was hypertension and bleeding. In 6 patients (14.3%) the treatment with bevacizumab was interrupted due to adverse events (thromboembolic events, bleeding and gastrointestinal perforation). Conclusions: Bevacizumab is a safe therapeutic option in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, provided that patients are provided close oncological and general medical monitoring

Immunoterapia czy terapia celowana w pierwszej linii leczenia chorych na zaawansowane/rozsiane czerniaki z obecnością mutacji BRAF — analiza jednoośrodkowa

Wstęp. Jednym z najważniejszych osiągnięć współczesnej onkologii jest odkrycie nowych możliwości terapeutycznych: terapii celowanej oraz immunoterapii związanej z inhibitorami punktów kontrolnych. Dotychczas nie ustalono jednoznacznie, która terapia powinna być zastosowana jako leczenie pierwszej linii u chorych na zaawansowane/rozsiane czerniaki z obecnością mutacji BRAF.Materiał i metody. Analizą objęto 137 chorych na zaawansowane/przerzutowe czerniaki z obecną mutacją BRAF, otrzymujących w ramach programów lekowych immunoterapię anty-PD-1 (IT) lub terapię ukierunkowaną molekularnie iBRAF ± iMEK (TT) jako leczenie pierwszej linii. Porównano terapie IT i TT stosowane jako leczenie pierwszej linii.Wyniki. Mediany czasu przeżycia całkowitego (OS) i czasu wolnego od progresji choroby (PFS) w całej badanej grupie wyniosły odpowiednio 14,0 i 7,3 miesiąca. Niekorzystnymi czynnikami rokowniczymi w zakresie OS i PFS były przerzuty do ośrodkowego układu nerwowego, podwyższona aktywność dehydrogenazy mleczanowej oraz stan sprawności > 1. Obecność przerzutów w > 2 lokalizacjach była niekorzystnym czynnikiem rokowniczym tylko w zakresie OS. Wykazano znamiennie statystyczną różnicę pomiędzy terapiami TT i IT w zakresie OS (p = 0,0011; mediana dla TT wyniosła 12,6 miesiąca, nie osiągnięto mediany dla IT). Należy jednak zaznaczyć, że grupa leczona TT charakteryzowała się gorszymi czynnikami prognostycznymi. Nie wykazano różnicy w zakresie PFS (p = 0,292; mediana dla TT 7,2 miesiąca, mediana dla IT 9,0 miesięcy).Wnioski. U chorych na zaawansowane/przerzutowe czerniaki z obecną mutacją BRAF bez gwałtownej progresji IT powinna być rozważana jako leczenie pierwszej linii