369 research outputs found
Untangling the Conceptual Isssues Raised in Reydon and Scholz’s Critique of Organizational Ecology and Darwinian Populations
Reydon and Scholz raise doubts about the Darwinian status of organizational ecology by arguing that Darwinian principles are not applicable to organizational populations. Although their critique of organizational ecology’s typological essentialism is correct, they go on to reject the Darwinian status of organizational populations. This paper claims that the distinction between replicators and interactors, raised in modern philosophy of biology but not discussed by Reydon and Scholz, points the way forward for organizational ecologists. It is possible to conceptualise evolving Darwinian populations providing the inheritance mechanism is appropriately specified. By this approach, adaptation and selection are no longer dichotomised, and the evolutionary significance of knowledge transmission is highlightedPeer reviewe
Local structure evolution in polycrystalline ZnMgO () studied by Raman and by synchrotron x-ray pair distribution analysis
The local structures of ZnMgO alloys have been studied by Raman
spectroscopy and by synchrotron x-ray pair distribution function (PDF)
analysis. Within the solid solution range () of
ZnMgO, the wurtzite framework is maintained with Mg homogeneously
distributed throughout the wurtzite lattice. The Raman line
of ZnMgO displays systematic changes in response to the evolution
of the crystal lattice upon the Mg-substitution. The red-shift and broadening
of the mode are explained by the expansion of hexagonal
-dimensions, and compositional disorder of Zn/Mg, respectively. Synchrotron
x-ray PDF analyses of ZnMgO reveal that the Mg atoms have a
slightly reduced wurtzite parameter and more regular tetrahedral bond
distances than the Zn atoms. For both Zn and Mg, the internal tetrahedral
geometries are independent of the alloy composition.Comment: 10 pages, 12 figures RevTe
Contemplating an evolutionary approach to entrepreneurship
This paper explores that application of evolutionary approaches to the study of entrepreneurship. It is argued an evolutionary theory of entrepreneurship must give as much concern to the foundations of evolutionary thought as it does the nature entrepreneurship. The central point being that we must move beyond a debate or preference of the natural selection and adaptationist viewpoints. Only then can the interrelationships between individuals, firms, populations and the environments within which they interact be better appreciated
Suppression of Superfluidity of He in a Nanoporous Glass by Preplating a Kr Layer
Helium in nanoporous media has attracted much interest as a model Bose system
with disorder and confinement. Here we have examined how a change in porous
structure by preplating a monolayer of krypton affects the superfluid
properties of He adsorbed or confined in a nanoporous Gelsil glass, which
has a three-dimensional interconnected network of nanopores of 5.8 nm in
diameter. Isotherms of adsorption and desorption of nitrogen show that
monolayer preplating of Kr decreases the effective pore diameter to 4.7 nm and
broadens the pore size distribution by about eight times from the sharp
distribution of the bare Gelsil sample. The superfluid properties were studied
by a torsional oscillator for adsorbed film states and pressurized liquid
states, both before and after the monolayer Kr preplating. In the film states,
both the superfluid transition temperature and the superfluid
density decrease about 10 percent by Kr preplating. The suppression of film
superfluidity is attributed to the quantum localization of He atoms by the
randomness in the substrate potential, which is caused by the
preplating--induced broadening of the pore size distribution. In the
pressurized liquid states, the superfluid density is found
to increase by 10 percent by Kr preplating, whereas is
decreased by 2 percent at all pressures. The unexpected enhancement of
might indicate the existence of an unknown disorder effect
for confined He.Comment: 27 pages, 8 figures, submitted to J. Phys. Soc. Jp
The Past and Future of Evolutionary Economics : Some Reflections Based on New Bibliometric Evidence
This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of the following article: Geoffrey M. Hodgson, and Juha-Antti Lamberg, ‘The past and future of evolutionary economics: some reflections based on new bibliometric evidence’, Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, first online 20 June 2016. The final publication is available at Springer via doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40844-016-0044-3 © Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics 2016The modern wave of ‘evolutionary economics’ was launched with the classic study by Richard Nelson and Sidney Winter (1982). This paper reports a broad bibliometric analysis of ‘evolutionary’ research in the disciplines of management, business, economics, and sociology over 25 years from 1986 to 2010. It confirms that Nelson and Winter (1982) is an enduring nodal reference point for this broad field. The bibliometric evidence suggests that ‘evolutionary economics’ has benefitted from the rise of business schools and other interdisciplinary institutions, which have provided a home for evolutionary terminology, but it has failed to nurture a strong unifying core narrative or theory, which in turn could provide superior answers to important questions. This bibliometric evidence also shows that no strong cluster of general theoretical research immediately around Nelson and Winter (1982) has subsequently emerged. It identifies developmental problems in a partly successful but fragmented field. Future research in ‘evolutionary economics’ needs a more integrated research community with shared conceptual narratives and common research questions, to promote conversation and synergy between diverse clusters of research.Peer reviewedFinal Accepted Versio
- …