3 research outputs found

    Tumor lineage-specific immune response in brain metastatic disease: opportunities for targeted immunotherapy regimen?

    Get PDF
    Metastases in the brain are the most severe and devastating complication of cancer. The incidence of brain metastasis is increasing. Therefore, the need of finding specific druggable targets for brain metastasis is demanding. The aim of this study was to compare the brain (immune) response to brain metastases of the most common tumor lineages, viz., lung adenocarcinoma and breast cancer. Targeted gene expression profiles of 11 brain metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma (BM-LUAD) were compared to 11 brain metastasis of breast cancer (BCBM) using NanoString nCounter PanCancer IO 360™ Panel. The most promising results were validated spatially using the novel GeoMx™ Digital Spatial Profiler (DSP) Technology. Additionally, Immune cell profiles and expression of drug targets were validated by multiplex immunohistochemistry. We found a more active immune response in BM-LUAD as compared to BCBM. In the BM-LUAD, 138 genes were upregulated as compared to BCBM (adj. p ≤ 0.05). Conversely, in BCBM 28 genes were upregulated (adj. p ≤ 0.05). Additionally, genes related to CD45 + cells, T cells, and cytotoxic T cells showed to be expressed higher in BM-LUAD compared to BCBM (adj. p = 0.01, adj. p = 0.023, adj. p = 0.023, respectively). The spatial quantification of the immune cells using the GeoMx DSP technique revealed the significantly higher quantification of CD14 and CD163 in tumor regions of BM-LUAD as compared to BCBM. Importantly, the immune checkpoint VISTA and IDO1 were identified as highly expressed in the BM-LUAD. Multiplex immunohistochemistry confirmed the finding and showed that VISTA is expressed mainly in BM-LUAD tumor cells, CD3 + cells, and to fewer levels in some microglial cells in BM-LUAD. This is the first report on differences in the brain immune response between metastatic tumors of different lineages. We found a far more extensive infiltration of immune cells in BM-LUAD as compared to BCBM. In addition, we found higher expression of VISTA and IDO1 in BM-LUAD. Taken together, targeted immune therapy should be considered to treat patients with BM-LUAD

    Gata2-regulated Gfi1b expression controls endothelial programming during endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition

    No full text
    The first hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are formed through endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition (EHT) events during embryonic development. The transcription factor GATA2 is a crucial regulator of EHT and HSC function throughout life. Because GATA2 haploinsufficiency patients have inborn mutations, prenatal defects are likely to have an influence on disease development. In mice, Gata2 haploinsufficiency (Gata2+/-) reduces the number and the functionality of embryonic hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) generated through EHT. However, the embryonic HSPC pool is heterogeneous and the mechanisms underlying this defect in Gata2+/- embryos are unclear. Here, we investigated whether Gata2 haploinsufficiency selectively affects a cellular subset undergoing EHT. We show that Gata2+/- HSPCs initiate but cannot fully activate hematopoietic programming during EHT. In addition, due to reduced activity of the endothelial repressor Gfi1b, Gata2+/- HSPCs cannot repress the endothelial identity to complete maturation. Finally, we show that hematopoietic-specific induction of gfi1b can restore HSC production in gata2b-null (gata2b-/-) zebrafish embryos. This study illustrates pivotal roles of Gata2 on the regulation of transcriptional network governing HSPC identity throughout EHT

    Immunomodulatory Effects of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Vaccination with Heat-Killed Mycobacterium Obuense (IMM-101) in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

    Get PDF
    Background: Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are treated with chemotherapy. In selected cases, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) can be added to the regimen. We hypothesized that adding an adjuvant containing a heat-killed mycobacterium (IMM-101) to SBRT may lead to beneficial immuno-modulatory effects, thereby improving survival. This study aims to investigate the safety of adding IMM-101 to SBRT and to investigate the immuno-modulatory effects of the combination treatment in the peripheral blood of LAPC patients. Methods: LAPC patients were treated with SBRT (40 Gy) and six intradermal vaccinations of one milligram IMM-101. The primary endpoint was an observed toxicity rate of grade 4 or higher. Targeted gene-expression profiling and multicolor flow cytometry were performed for longitudinal immune-monitoring of the peripheral blood. Results: Twenty patients received study treatment. No treatment-related adverse events of grade 4 or higher occurred. SBRT/IMM-101 treatment induced a transient decrease in different lymphocyte subsets and an increase in CD14+CD16−CD11b+HLA−DRlow myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Importantly, treatment significantly increased activated ICOS+, HLA-DR+ and Ki67+PD1+ T and NK cell frequencies. This was not accompanied by increased levels of most inhibitory markers, such as TIM-3 and LAG-3. Conclusions: Combination therapy with SBRT and a heat-killed mycobacterium vaccine was safe and had an immune-stimulatory effect
    corecore