Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease on Dialysis and without Dialysis: Results of the PEPPER-Study

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is common in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease and is an independent predictor of mortality. However, specific hemodynamics of the pulmonary circulation, changes induced by hemodialysis and characterization into pre- or postcapillary PH have not been evaluated in patients with chronic kidney disease. We assessed consecutive patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease in WHO FC≥II with dyspnea unexplained by other causes on hemodialysis (group 1, n = 31) or without dialysis (group 2, n = 31) using right heart catheterization (RHC). In group 1, RHC was performed before and after dialysis. In end-stage chronic kidney disease, prevalence of precapillary PH was 13% (4/31), and postcapillary PH was discovered in 65% (20/31). All four cases of precapillary PH were unmasked after dialysis. In group 2, two cases of precapillary PH were detected (6%), and postcapillary PH was diagnosed in 22 cases (71%). This is the first study examining a large cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease invasively by RHC for the prevalence of PH. The prevalence of precapillary PH was 13% in patients with end-stage kidney disease. That suggests careful screening for precapillary PH in this selected patient population. RHC should be performed after hemodialysis

The imbalance between proliferation and apoptosis contributes to degeneration of aortic valves and bioprostheses

Background: The pathomechanisms underlying aortic valve degeneration are incompletely understood. Therefore, the aim of our work was to assess the quantitative changes of proliferation and apoptosis accompanied by cellular phenotype alternations and matrix secretionin aortic sclerotic and stenotic valves and degenerative bioprostheses, as well as to detect the expression pattern of the rapamycin receptor FKBP12 across these three valve types.Methods: Mild-to-moderate sclerotic and stenotic valves and degenerative bioprostheses from 30 patients (n = 10 per group) were collected at autopsy or by surgery. Ki67+, FKBP12+, alpha-actin+, HSP47+ and TUNEL+ apoptotic cells were analyzed by immunohistochemistry.Results: The main finding was the reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis in stenotic valves (ST) compared to the sclerotic ones (SC) (proliferation: ST: 20.8 ± 2.0% vs. SC: 30.1 ±2.2%, apoptosis: ST: 40.7 ± 5.0% vs. SC: 28.0 ± 5.1%, p < 0.05, respectively). Analogical alternations were found in degenerative bioprostheses (BP) (proliferation: 4.8 ± 2.3%; apoptosis: 13.1 ± 6.8%). Corresponding changes were observed in the valve cellularity (ST: 893 ± 168, SC: 1034 ± 284, BP: 385 ± 179 cells/mm2, p < 0.05, respectively). The FKBP12 signaling was reduced in diseased valves and bioprostheses (ST: 28.1 ± 3.6%, SC: 42.2 ± 3.8%, BP: 5.8 ± 1.9%, p < 0.05, respectively). Further, the augmented alpha-actin expressionwas observed as the degenerative process progressed (ST: 30.3 ± 5.0%, SC: 22.6 ± 2.7%, BP:8.7 ± 4.0%, p < 0.05, respectively), followed by the upregulation of HSP47 (ST: 22.6 ± 2.8%,SC: 15.4 ± 2.1%, BP: 3.4 ± 1.0%, p < 0.05, respectively) and consecutive matrix accumulation.Conclusions: The imbalance between proliferation and apoptosis with cellular phenotypical shift and subsequent matrix secretion may contribute to aortic valve stenosis and bioprosthesis degeneration. The identification of FKBP12 expression may implicate potential therapeutic strategies

Crossover Patient Outcomes for Targeted Lung Denervation in Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease:AIRFLOW-2

BACKGROUND: Targeted Lung Denervation (TLD) is a potential new therapy for COPD. Radiofrequency energy is bronchoscopically delivered to the airways to disrupt pulmonary parasympathetic nerves, to reduce bronchoconstriction, mucus hypersecretion, and bronchial hyperreactivity. OBJECTIVES: This work assesses the effect of TLD on COPD exacerbations (AECOPD) in crossover subjects in the AIRFLOW-2 trial. METHOD: The AIRFLOW-2 trial is a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover trial of TLD in COPD. Patients with symptomatic COPD on optimal medical therapy with an FEV1 of 30-60% predicted received either TLD or sham bronchoscopy in a 1:1 randomization. Those in the sham arm had the opportunity to cross into the treatment arm after 12 months. The primary end point was rate of respiratory adverse events. Secondary end points included adverse events, changes in lung function and health-related quality of life and symptom scores. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated with TLD in the crossover phase and were subsequently followed up for 12 months (50% female, mean age 64.1 ± 6.9 years). After TLD, there was a trend towards a reduction in time to first AECOPD (hazard ratio 0.65, p = 0.28, not statistically significant) in comparison to sham follow-up period. There was also a reduction in time to first severe AECOPD in the crossover period (hazard ratio 0.38, p = 0.227, not statistically significant). Symptom scores and lung function showed stability. CONCLUSIONS: AIRFLOW-2 crossover data support that of the randomization phase, showing trends towards reduction in COPD exacerbations with TLD

Impact of pulmonary vein isolation on obstructive sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been identified as associated with the onset and propagation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and predicts recurrences of AF after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Vice versa, it has never been investigated whether PVI influences OSA. However, it has been controversial whether a restored atrial function can affect the course of OSA. There­fore, we have assessed whether PVI procedure modulates the prevalence and severity of OSA. Methods and Results: We included 23 individuals with AF that were assigned to undergo PVI into this study. Patients were 65 ± 7 years old, obese (BMI 29.9 ± 5.4 kg/m2), white (100%) and had a normal left ventricular function (LVEF 64 ± 9%). Polygraphic assessment was carried out before and 6 months after PVI. The prevalence of OSA, defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 per hour of sleep, was 74% before PVI compared to 70% 6 months after the procedure (p > 0.05). Severity of OSA did not differ (AHI before vs. after: 18 ± 18/h vs. 15 ± 17/h, p > 0.05) as well as further polygraphic parameters did not differ before and after the procedure. Conclusions: Prevalence and severity of OSA are not affected by PVI in patients suffering from AF.

Pathogen burden, inflammation, proliferation and apoptosis in human in-stent restenosis - Tissue characteristics compared to primary atherosclerosis

Pathogenic events leading to in-stent restenosis (ISR) are still incompletely understood. Among others, inflammation, immune reactions, deregulated cell death and growth have been suggested. Therefore, atherectomy probes from 21 patients with symptomatic ISR were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for pathogen burden and compared to primary target lesions from 20 stable angina patients. While cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, Epstein-Barr virus and Helicobacter pylori were not found in ISR, acute and/or persistent chlamydial infection were present in 6/21 of these lesions (29%). Expression of human heat shock protein 60 was found in 8/21 of probes (38%). Indicated by distinct signals of CD68, CD40 and CRP, inflammation was present in 5/21 (24%), 3/21 (14%) and 2/21 (10%) of ISR cases. Cell density of ISR was significantly higher than that of primary lesions ( 977 +/- 315 vs. 431 +/- 148 cells/mm(2); p < 0.001). There was no replicating cell as shown by Ki67 or PCNA. TUNEL+ cells indicating apoptosis were seen in 6/21 of ISR specimens (29%). Quantitative analysis revealed lower expression levels for each intimal determinant in ISR compared to primary atheroma (all p < 0.05). In summary, human ISR at the time of clinical presentation is characterized by low frequency of pathogen burden and inflammation, but pronounced hypercellularity, low apoptosis and absence of proliferation. Copyright (C) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

Trends in COVID-19-associated mortality in patients with pulmonary hypertension: a COMPERA analysis

In patients with pulmonary hypertension, the mortality rate associated with COVID-19 has declined sharply with the emergence of the Omicron variants https://bit.ly/42OMsf

Safety and Adverse Events after Targeted Lung Denervation for Symptomatic Moderate to Severe COPD (AIRFLOW):A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

International audienc

Two-Year Outcomes for the Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Study of Targeted Lung Denervation in Patients with Moderate to Severe COPD:AIRFLOW-2

Purpose: COPD exacerbations are associated with worsening clinical outcomes and increased healthcare costs, despite use of optimal medical therapy. A novel bronchoscopic therapy, targeted lung denervation (TLD), which disrupts parasympathetic pulmonary innervation of the lung, has been developed to reduce clinical consequences of cholinergic hyperactivity and its impact on COPD exacerbations. The AIRFLOW-2 study assessed the durability of safety and efficacy of TLD additive to optimal drug therapy compared to sham bronchoscopy and optimal drug therapy alone in subjects with moderate-to-severe, symptomatic COPD two years post randomization. Patients and Methods: TLD was performed in COPD patients (FEV1 30-60% predicted, CAT≥10 or mMRC≥2) in a 1:1 randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded multicenter study (AIRFLOW-2) using a novel lung denervation system (Nuvaira, Inc., USA). Subjects remained blinded until their 12.5-month follow-up visit when control subjects were offered the opportunity to undergo TLD. A time-to-first-event analysis on moderate and severe and severe exacerbations of COPD was performed. Results: Eighty-two subjects (FEV1 41.6±7.4% predicted, 50.0% male, age 63.7±6.8 yrs, 24% with prior year respiratory hospitalization) were randomized. Time-to-first severe COPD exacerbation was significantly lengthened in the TLD arm (p=0.04, HR=0.38) at 2 years post-TLD therapy and trended towards similar attenuation for moderate and severe COPD exacerbations (p=0.18, HR=0.71). No significant changes in lung function or SGRQ-C were found 2 years post randomization between groups. Conclusion: In a randomized trial, TLD demonstrated a durable effect of significantly lower risk of severe AECOPD over 2 years. Further, lung function and quality of life remained stable following TLD. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02058459

Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With COPD : Results From the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA)

Funding Information: FUNDING/SUPPORT: This work was supported by the German Center of Lung Research (DZL). COMPERA is funded by unrestricted grants from Acceleron , Actelion Pharmaceuticals , Bayer , OMT , and GSK . Funding Information: Financial/nonfinancial disclosures: The authors have reported to CHEST the following: C. D. V. has received fees for serving as a speaker, consultant, and an advisory board member from the following companies: Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Dompè, GSK, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. M. M. H. has received speaker fees, honoraria, or both for consultations from Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Janssen, MSD, and Pfizer. D. H. has received travel compensation from Actelion, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Shire. D. P. has received fees for consultations from Actelion, Aspen, Biogen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, and Pfizer. N. B. received speaker fees from Bayer/MSD and Actelion/Janssen. K. M. O. has received speaker fees from Actelion, Bayer, and Lilly. H. A. G. has received honorariums for consultations, speaking at conferences, or both from Bayer HealthCare AG, Actelion, Encysive, Pfizer, Ergonex, Lilly, and Novartis. He is member of advisory boards for Bayer HealthCare AG, Pfizer, GSK, Actelion, Lilly, Merck, Encysive, and Ergonex. He also has received governmental grants from the German Research Foundation (DFG), Excellence Cluster Cardiopulmonary Research (ECCPS), State Government of Hessen (LOEWE), and the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF). M. Held has received speaker fees and honoraria for consultations from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Encysive, Glaxo Smith Kline, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Nycomed, Roche, and Servier. H. K. has received speaker fees and honoraria for consultations from Actelion, Bayer, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics and research grants from Actelion. T. J. L. has received speaker fees, honoraria for consultations, and research funding from Actelion, Acceleron Pharma, Bayer, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, and Pfizer. S. R. has received honoraria for lectures, consultancy, or both from Actavis, Actelion, Bayer, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. D. D. declares honoraria for lectures, consultancy, or both from Actelion, Bayer, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier; participation in clinical trials for Actelion, Bayer, GSK, and Novartis; and research support to his institution from Actelion. R. B. has received fees from GSK, UT, Dompè, Bayer, Ferrer, MSD, and AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals. M. C. has received fees for consulting from GSK and speaker fees from Bayer and Pfizer. M. Halank has received speaker fees and/or honoraria for consultations from Acceleron, Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BayerChemie, GSK, Janssen, MSD and Novartis. A. V.-N. reports receiving lecture fees from Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, and Pfizer; serves on the advisory board of Actelion and Bayer; and serves on steering committees for Actelion, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer. D. S. received fees for lectures, consulting, research support, or a combination thereof to his institution from Actelion, Bayer, GSK, and Pfizer. R. E. has received speaker fees and honoraria for consultations from Actelion, Bayer, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. J. S. R. G. has received speaker fees and honoraria for consultations from Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Complexa, GSK, MSD, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. M. D. has received investigator, speaker, consultant, or steering committee member fees from Actelion, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Eli Lilly, Encysive, Gilead (Myogen), GlaxoSmithKline, Nippon Shyniaku, Novartis, Pfizer, Schering, and United Therapeutics; educational grants from Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and Therabel; and research grants from Actelion, Pfizer, and GlaxoSmithKline. She is holder of the Actelion Chair for Pulmonary Hypertension and of the GSK chair for research and education in pulmonary vascular pathology at the Catholic University of Leuven. J. C. has received fees for consultancies and lectures from Actelion, Bayer, GSK, United Therapeutics, and Pfizer as well as equipment and educational grants from Actelion. C. O. has received speaker fees and honoraria for consultations from Actelion, Bayer, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer. H. K. has received honoraria for lectures, consultancy, or both from Actelion-Janssen, Amicus Therapeutics, and Bristol Meyers Squibb. O. D. has or had consultancy relationships, has received research funding (last 3 years), or both from AbbVie, Actelion, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Catenion, Competitive Corpus, Drug Development International Ltd, CSL Behring, ChemomAb, Ergonex, Galapagos NV, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Horizon (Curzion) Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, iQone, iQvia, Kymera Therapeutics, Lilly, medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Target Bio Science, and UCB in the area of potential treatments of scleroderma and its complications including PH. In addition, he has a patent mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis issued (US8247389, EP2331143). E. G. has received honoraria for consultations, speaking at conferences, or both from Bayer/MSD, Actelion/Janssen, GWT-TUD, and OMT/United Therapeutics. None declared (A. S.). Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The AuthorsBackground: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) in COPD is a poorly investigated clinical condition. Research Question: Which factors determine the outcome of PH in COPD? Study Design and Methods: We analyzed the characteristics and outcome of patients enrolled in the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) with moderate or severe PH in COPD as defined during the 6th PH World Symposium who received medical therapy for PH and compared them with patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH). Results: The population included incident patients with moderate PH in COPD (n = 68), with severe PH in COPD (n = 307), and with IPAH (n = 489). Patients with PH in COPD were older, predominantly male, and treated mainly with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Despite similar hemodynamic impairment, patients with PH in COPD achieved a worse 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and showed a more advanced World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC). Transplant-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were higher in the IPAH group than in the PH in COPD group (IPAH: 94%, 75%, and 55% vs PH in COPD: 86%, 55%, and 38%; P = .004). Risk factors for poor outcomes in PH in COPD were male sex, low 6MWD, and high pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). In patients with severe PH in COPD, improvements in 6MWD by ≥ 30 m or improvements in WHO FC after initiation of medical therapy were associated with better outcomes. Interpretation: Patients with PH in COPD were functionally more impaired and had a poorer outcome than patients with IPAH. Predictors of death in the PH in COPD group were sex, 6MWD, and PVR. Our data raise the hypothesis that some patients with severe PH in COPD may benefit from PH treatment. Randomized controlled studies are necessary to explore this hypothesis further. Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01347216; URL: www.clinicaltrials.govpublishersversionPeer reviewe