20 research outputs found
Assessment of injury severity of nearside occupants in pole impacts to side of passenger cars in European traffic accidents - analysis of German and UK in-depth data
The national accident statistics demonstrate that the
situation of passenger car side impacts is dominated
by car to car accidents. Car side to pole impacts are
relatively infrequent events. However the importance
of car side to pole impacts is significantly increasing
with fatal and seriously injured occupants.
For the present study the German in-depth database
GIDAS (German In-Depth-Accident Study) and the
UK database CCIS (Co-operative Crash Injury
Study) were used. Two approaches were undertaken
to better understand the scenario of car to
pole impacts. The first part is a statistical analysis
of passenger car side to pole impacts to describe the
characteristics and their importance relevant to
other types of impact and to get further knowledge
about the main factors influencing the accident outcome.
The second part contains a case by case review
on passenger cars first registered 1998 onwards
to further investigate this type of impact including
regression analysis to assess the relationship
between injury severity and pole impact relevant
factors
Priorities for enhanced side impact protection in regulation 95 compliant cars
This paper summarises the main results of an analysis
of accident data conducted for the European
Enhanced Vehicles Committee (EEVC) WG13 "Side
Impact" to inform the further development of side
impact test procedures for cars. The analysis of data
from three countries was coordinated by EEVC WG
21 âAccident Studiesâ.
The national datasets of the UK, France and Sweden
from the year 2005 were analysed containing a total
of 411,311 cars. In each country side impacts
typically represented 33% of all fatalities but less
than 25% of casualties of all severities. Struck-side
occupants represented typically 60% of all side
impact casualties regardless of injury severity while
the remainder of the casualties were seated away on
the non-struck-side. Amongst single vehicle side impacts, collisions with
poles were most commonly specified, although there
was considerable variation between countries. In
multi-vehicle crashes the collision partner was a car
in about 75% of cases. The relative involvement of
each type of collision partner varied by casualty
severity and in both the UK and France there were
similar numbers of fatalities in collisions with poles
as with cars. A comparison of injury risks suggested
the risk of serious injury in newer cars struck by
other newer cars was similar to older, pre-Regulation
95, cars struck by older cars. This indicates the
improvements in side protection since the
introduction of Regulation 95 may have been at least
partially offset by increases in front stiffness of cars
due to the introduction of Regulation 94 and
EuroNCAP.
The paper presents other details on the circumstances
of side impacts and the different driver populations
involved in loss-of control and intersection collisions. It links to two other papers concerning car-to-car and
car-to-pole side collisions using in-depth data
A European fatal crash database
A lack of representative European accident data to aid the development of safety policy, regulation and
technological advancement is a major obstacle in the European Union. Data are needed to assess the
performance of road and vehicle safety and is also needed to support the development of further actions by
stakeholders. This short-paper describes the process of developing a data collection and analysis system
designed to partly fill these gaps. A project team with members from 7 countries was set up to devise
appropriate variable lists to collect fatal crash data under the following topic levels: accident, road
environment, vehicle, and road user, using retrospective detailed police reports (n=1,300). The typical level
of detail recorded was a minimum of 150 variables for each accident. The project will enable
multidisciplinary information on the circumstances of fatal crashes to be interpreted to provide information
on a range of causal factors and events surrounding the collisions
Recommendations for establishing Pan European transparent and independent road accident investigations
A set of recommendations for pan-European transparent and independent road accident investigations has been developed by
the SafetyNet project. The aim of these recommendations is to pave the way for future EU scale accident investigation
activities by setting out the necessary steps for establishing safety oriented road accident investigations in Member States.
This can be seen as the start of the process for establishing road accident investigations throughout Europe which operate
according to a common methodology.
The recommendations propose a European Safety Oriented Road Accident Investigation Programme which sets out the
procedures that need to be put in place to investigate a sample of every day road accidents. They address four sets of issues;
institutional addressing the characteristics of the programme; operational describing the conditions under which data is
collected; data storage and protection; and reports, countermeasures and the dissemination of data
The development of a European fatal accident database
A lack of representative European accident data to aid the development of safety policy, regulation and
technological advancement is a major obstacle in the European Union. Data are needed to assess the
performance of road and vehicle safety and is also needed to support the development of further actions by
stakeholders. A recent analysis conducted by the European Transport Safety Council identified that there
was no single system in place that could meet all of the needs and that there were major gaps including indepth
crash causation information. This paper describes the process of developing a data collection and
analysis system designed to partly fill these gaps. A project team with members from 7 countries was set up
to devise appropriate variable lists to collect fatal crash data under the following topic levels: accident, road
environment, vehicle, and road user, using retrospective detailed police reports (n=1,300). The typical level
of detail recorded was a minimum of 150 variables for each accident. The project will enable
multidisciplinary information on the circumstances of fatal crashes to be interpreted to provide information
on a range of causal factors and events surrounding the collisions. This has major applications in the areas of
active safety systems, infrastructure and road safety, as well as for tailoring behavioural interventions
Proposing a framework for pan European transparent and independent road accident investigation
Unlike the rail, civil aviation and maritime transport modes, there is currently
no standard process for investigating road accidents within Europe. There is,
therefore, a wide range of road accident investigation procedures and
protocols in place across Europe. However, as countries work towards
meeting both their own road safety targets and those set by the European
Commission, it may be that existing investigation practices are no longer
suited to facilitating the decision making processes of road safety policymakers
or practitioners.
SafetyNet is a European Commission supported project, which is building a
European Road Safety Observatory to facilitate the formulation of road safety
policy in the European Union. Work package 4 of SafetyNet is developing
recommendations for a Transparent and Independent pan-European
approach to road accident investigation.
These recommendations propose the establishment of an independent body
for undertaking transparent and independent accident investigations where
necessary, or the implementation of these investigations in existing national
safety orientated accident investigation activities, in each of the EU Member
States. This body would gather and manage accident investigation data and
use this data to further progress road safety within the EU.
To define the framework in which this body might operate, âBest practiceâ from
existing investigative organisations across Europe was examined in order to
produce a set of draft recommendations which focused on four categories of
issues:
1. Institutional, referring to the structure and functioning of the body
responsible for road safety investigations;
2. Operational, detailing how the body carries out investigations;
3. Data, addressing issues surrounding the storage, retrieval and
analysis of data generated by investigations; and
4. Development of Countermeasures, dealing with how investigation
conclusions should be presented, used and disseminated.
A consultation exercise was then undertaken in order to gather the expert
opinion of European road safety stakeholders and to further develop the
recommended framework. This highlighted a number of key questions about
the Draft Recommendations including:
âą Is the proposed level of transparency and independence appropriate
for road accident investigations?
âą Is one type of investigative activity appropriate for all types of accidents
ranging from the most severe or âmajorâ accidents to the large number
of more minor accidents that occur everyday?
The major conclusion was that a âone size fits allâ approach is not appropriate
for the investigation of road accidents and therefore multiple sets of
recommendations are required. This paper discusses how the four categories
of recommendations combine to form a framework where the data gathered
during road accident investigations can be used to develop road accident
countermeasures which will assist in casualty reduction throughout Europe
The development of a European fatal accident database
A lack of representative European accident data to aid the development of safety policy, regulation and
technological advancement is a major obstacle in the European Union. Data are needed to assess the
performance of road and vehicle safety and is also needed to support the development of further actions by
stakeholders. A recent analysis conducted by the European Transport Safety Council identified that there
was no single system in place that could meet all of the needs and that there were major gaps including indepth
crash causation information. This paper describes the process of developing a data collection and
analysis system designed to partly fill these gaps. A project team with members from 7 countries was set up
to devise appropriate variable lists to collect fatal crash data under the following topic levels: accident, road
environment, vehicle, and road user, using retrospective detailed police reports (n=1,300). The typical level
of detail recorded was a minimum of 150 variables for each accident. The project will enable
multidisciplinary information on the circumstances of fatal crashes to be interpreted to provide information
on a range of causal factors and events surrounding the collisions. This has major applications in the areas of
active safety systems, infrastructure and road safety, as well as for tailoring behavioural interventions
The development of a multidisciplinary system to understand causal factors in road crashes
The persistent lack of crash causation data to help inform and monitor road and vehicle
safety policy is a major obstacle. Data are needed to assess the performance of road
and vehicle safety stakeholders and is needed to support the development of further
actions. A recent analysis conducted by the European Transport Safety Council
identified that there was no single system in place that could meet all of the needs and
that there were major gaps including in-depth crash causation information. This paper
describes the process of developing a data collection and analysis system designed to fill
these gaps. A project team with members from 7 countries was set up to devise
appropriate variable lists to collect crash causation information under the following topic
levels: accident, road environment, vehicle, and road user, using two quite different sets
of resources: retrospective detailed police reports (n=1300) and prospective,
independent, on-scene accident research investigations (n=1000). Data categorisation
and human factors analysis methods based on Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis
Method (Hollnagel, 1998) were developed to enable the causal factors to be recorded,
linked and understood. A harmonised, prospective âon-sceneâ method for recording the
root causes and critical events of road crashes was developed. Where appropriate, this
includes interviewing road users in collaboration with more routine accident investigation
techniques. The typical level of detail recorded is a minimum of 150 variables for each
accident. The project will enable multidisciplinary information on the circumstances of
crashes to be interpreted to provide information on the causal factors. This has major
applications in the areas of active safety systems, infrastructure and road safety, as well
as for tailoring behavioural interventions. There is no direct model available
internationally that uses such a systems based approach
Future research directions in injury biomechanics and passive safety research
There has been an increasing trend within the safety environment for funding to be directed towards applied
research or towards research developing commercially-exploitable systems. Funding mechanisms such
as the EUâs 6th Framework Programme and many national programmes focus on research of likely immediate
social benefit, reflecting the use of public finances. These programmes will continue to play an important
role in funding safety research, but they typically do not have guidelines specifically directed towards
fundamental research questions. Additionally, impartial advice is not always available to help programme
managers identify research priorities.
This review of biomechanics and passive safety research is intended for use by researchers who may be contemplating
research in certain areas and wish independent guidance on specific research questions. It is also intended for
use by research funding groups and programme managers who would like impartial guidance on basic research to
be supported. It covers engineering research directed at improving vehicles and safety systems for all types of road
user. It includes the main research and development tools such as dummy development and humanoid modelling
and the important area of crash injury data
The development of a multidisciplinary system to understand causal factors in road crashes
The persistent lack of crash causation data to help inform and monitor road and vehicle
safety policy is a major obstacle. Data are needed to assess the performance of road
and vehicle safety stakeholders and is needed to support the development of further
actions. A recent analysis conducted by the European Transport Safety Council
identified that there was no single system in place that could meet all of the needs and
that there were major gaps including in-depth crash causation information. This paper
describes the process of developing a data collection and analysis system designed to fill
these gaps. A project team with members from 7 countries was set up to devise
appropriate variable lists to collect crash causation information under the following topic
levels: accident, road environment, vehicle, and road user, using two quite different sets
of resources: retrospective detailed police reports (n=1300) and prospective,
independent, on-scene accident research investigations (n=1000). Data categorisation
and human factors analysis methods based on Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis
Method (Hollnagel, 1998) were developed to enable the causal factors to be recorded,
linked and understood. A harmonised, prospective âon-sceneâ method for recording the
root causes and critical events of road crashes was developed. Where appropriate, this
includes interviewing road users in collaboration with more routine accident investigation
techniques. The typical level of detail recorded is a minimum of 150 variables for each
accident. The project will enable multidisciplinary information on the circumstances of
crashes to be interpreted to provide information on the causal factors. This has major
applications in the areas of active safety systems, infrastructure and road safety, as well
as for tailoring behavioural interventions. There is no direct model available
internationally that uses such a systems based approach