26 research outputs found
Diagnostically significant differences septic and aseptic instability of endoprosthesis components during arthroplasty of large joints
The purpose of the work is to analyze the results of laboratory, microbiological and instrumental studies to search for screening criteria for the difference between aseptic and septic instability of endoprosthesis components after knee and hip joint arthroplasty. The materials contained 146 cases of revision arthroplasty of the knee and hip joints, performed under the conditions of Federal State Budgetary Institution Federal Center of Traumatology, Orthopedics and endoprosthesis replacement of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Cheboksary) for a 3-year period, including cases of aseptic instability - 69, septic instability-77. By methods for laboratory diagnosis were used to evaluate the blood levels of leukocytes, stab neutrophils, ESR, C-reactive protein (CRP), presepsin, procalcitonin, D-dimer, interleukin-6. Using ultrasound (ultrasonic) examination of the periprosthetic zone, the presence of fluid, granulation tissue in the joint cavity, altered lymph nodes was determined. Before the operation, the level of cytosis and cellular composition were determined in the synovial fluid; tissue bioptates, removed components of implants (after ULTRASONIC treatment) with sowing on the microflora were studied intraoperatively. Intraoperative tissue biopsies were used to make smears-prints on the glass, with gram staining, estimating the number of leukocytes and neutrophils in the field of vision. Results. Determination of indicators of ESR, presepsin and interleukin-6, the level of which goes beyond the generally recognized normal values in the presence of infection, can be recommended as a screening test in the diagnosis of the infectious nature of instability of the components of the endoprosthesis of large joints. The second stage of differential diagnosis of septic and aseptic instability can be the detection of lymphadenopathy. The third (final) stage of determining the infectious nature of instability is an invasive technique to determine the level of cytosis with the calculation of neutrophils in the synovial fluid.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ - Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
, ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½Π³-ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ΅Π² ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ². ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 146 ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ², Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Β«Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΒ» ΠΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ (Π³. Π§Π΅Π±ΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΡ) Π·Π° 3-Π»Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄, ΠΈΠ· Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π² Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ - 69, ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ - 77. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ², ΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ², Π‘ΠΠ, Π‘-ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ° (Π‘Π Π), ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½Π°, ΠΏΡΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ½Π°, Π-Π΄ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°, ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈΠ½Π°-6. Π‘ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°Π·Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ (Π£Π) ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π·ΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΆΠΈΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π°, ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π»ΠΈΠΌΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ·Π»ΠΎΠ². Π΄ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠΈΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ·Π° ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²; ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠ΅ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΏΡΠ°ΡΡ, ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΡ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ² (ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π£Π ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ) Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΌ Π½Π° ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ. ΠΠ· ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅Π²ΡΡ
Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Π·ΠΊΠΈ-ΠΎΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ»Π΅, Ρ ΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΡΠ°ΠΌΡ, ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π΅ Π·ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π‘ΠΠ, ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈΠ½Π°-6, ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π²ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ Π·Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠ½Π³-ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π° ΠΊΡΡΠΏΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ². ΠΡΠΎΡΡΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠΎΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΡΡ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π»ΠΈΠΌΡΠΎΠ°Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΌ (Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ) ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ·Π° Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠΈΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the analgesic effect of selective and non-selective cyclooxygenase blockers in the composition of multimodal analgesia after knee joint endoprosthesis replacement
The purpose of the work is to compare the effectiveness of anesthesia with the use of a highly specific blocker COX-2 and a dedicated cyclo-oxygenase blocker COX-1 and COX-2 lornoxicam as part of multimodal analgesia in patients after primary knee replacement. The material was the cases of knee prosthesis (N=196) using multimodal analgesia; patients were divided into two groups, depending on the type of anesthesia, in accordance with the developed scheme of pharmacotherapy: I β receiving celecoxib (n=98) and II - lornoxicam (n=98). Methods for evaluating the effectiveness of anesthesia were the visual analogue scale (VAS), the KSS knee joint function evaluation scale before surgery and on the 5th day after it; analysis of the features of early verticalization, the patient's need for additional pain relief after surgery; costs of drug therapy are calculated. Results. Patients of both groups were comparable in age and average duration of hospitalization. The pain syndrome assessment on the VAS scale showed a higher efficacy of pain relief on days 1 and 5 in group II (4.1 Β± 0.1 versus 3.5 Β± 0.1 and 1.9 Β± 0.04 versus 1.6 Β± 0.1 points respectively) (pβ€0.05). Evaluation of the functional activity of the prosthetic knee joint on the KSS scale did not reveal any differences between the groups. Of the features of early verticalization on the first day after surgery, a higher percentage of weakness in the legs (79.6%) and nausea (70.4%) was noted in group I, and a higher percentage of dizziness (15.3%) and hemodynamic disorders (6.1% of cases). The cost of providing basic pain therapy in group I was 2.4 times higher than in group II, with the same costs for additional anesthesia with solutions of paracetamol and narcotic analgesics. Conclusions. As part of multimodal analgesia, Lornoxicam showed a higher efficacy in relieving pain syndrome at a low cost of a course of treatment compared with celecoxib.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ - ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π΅Π·Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ° Π¦ΠΠ-2 ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ±Π° ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ³Π΅Π½Π°Π·Ρ Π¦ΠΠ-1 ΠΈ Π¦ΠΠ-2 Π»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ° Π² ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π΅ ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ³Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π°. ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ² (N=196) Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ³Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΈ; Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΎΠ±Π΅Π·Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π² ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΠΌΠ°ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Π½Π° Π΄Π²Π΅ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ: I - ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ± (n=98) ΠΈ II - Π»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌ (n=98). ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π΅Π·Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Π²ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Π° (ΠΠΠ¨), ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Π° ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π° KSS Π΄ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π½Π° 5 ΡΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π½Π΅Ρ; Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°Π½Π½Π΅ΠΉ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Π² Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Π΅Π·Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ; ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½Ρ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ·Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ. ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΈΡ
Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ Π΄Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌΠ° ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Π΅ ΠΠΠ¨ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΡΠΏΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌΠ° Π½Π° 1 ΠΈ 5 ΡΡΡΠΊΠΈ Π²ΠΎ II Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ (4,1Β±0,1 ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 3,5Β±0,1 ΠΈ 1,9Β±0,04 ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 1,6Β±0,1 Π±Π°Π»Π»Π° ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ) (pβ€0,05). ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π° ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Π΅ KSS Π½Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ»Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ°ΠΌΠΈ. ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π½Π½Π΅ΠΉ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² 1 ΡΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ: Π² I Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ - Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ»Π°Π±ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² Π½ΠΎΠ³Π°Ρ
(79,6%) ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡ (70,4%), Π²ΠΎ II - Π²ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ (15,3%) ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π³Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ (6,1% ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Π²). ΠΠ°ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π΅Π·Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π² I Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ Π² 2,4 ΡΠ°Π·Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ II Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ, ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π²Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°Ρ
Π½Π° Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Π΅Π·Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π° ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π°Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ³Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ². ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌ Π² ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π΅ ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ³Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π» Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΡΠΏΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠΌ
Regulation of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator gene by the oncogene Tpr-Met involves GRB2
The oncogene Tpr-Met is a constitutively active form of the hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) receptor Met. It comprises the intracellular moiety of Met linked to the dimerization domain of the nuclear envelope protein Tpr, thus functioning as a constitutively activated Met. HGF/SF is responsible for various biological processes including angiogenesis and wound healing, in which secreted serine protease urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is implicated. The action of HGF/SF on cells is mediated by the autophosphorylation of Met on two carboxyterminal tyrosine residues, Y1349VHVNATVY1356VNV. The two tyrosine residues provide docking sites for various effector molecules, suggesting that multiple signaling pathways are activated to exert biological effects of HGF/SF [Ponzetto et al., Cell (1994) 77: 261]. We found that Tpr-Met efficiently activates the uPA gene via a SOS/Ras/extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK)-dependent signaling pathway. Mutation of Y1356, which abrogates GRB2 binding, reduced the induction to half of the control level, while mutation of Y1349 showed little effect on uPA induction, suggesting an important but partly replaceable role for GRB2 in Met-dependent uPA gene induction. Mutation of both Y1349VHV and Y1356VNV into optimal PI 3-kinase sites resulted in a residual induction of about one quarter of the control level, suggesting a potential role for PI 3-kinase. Dose-response analysis of the Tpr-Met showed a biphasic curve. These results suggest that the interplay among different signaling molecules on the receptor is important for full induction of the pathway leading to the activation of the uPA gene
Nuclear phospholipid signaling: phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C and phosphoinositide 3-kinase
Over the last 20 years, numerous studies have demonstrated the existence of nuclear phosphoinositide signaling distinct from the one at the plasma membrane. The activation of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), the generation of diacylglycerol, and the accumulation of the 3-phosphorylated phosphoinositides have been documented in the nuclei of different cell types. In this review, we summarize some recent studies of the subnuclear localization, mechanisms of activation, and the possible physiological roles of the nuclear PI-PLC and PI-3 kinases in the regulation of cell cycle, survival, and differentiation
IL-4 enhances survival of in vitro-differentiated mouseΒ basophils through transcription-independent signaling downstream of PI3K
Interleukin 4 (IL-4) is a critical cytokine implicated with T2 immune reactions, which are linked to pathologic conditions of allergic diseases. In that context, the initiation of T2 responses can critically depend on early basophil-derived IL-4 to activate T-cell responses, which then amplify IL-4 secretion. As a pleiotropic cytokine, IL-4 acts on a broad variety of hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cells. However, the effect of IL-4 on basophils themselves, which are emerging as relevant players in allergic as well as autoimmune diseases, was only scarcely addressed so far. Here we used in vitro-differentiated mouse basophils to investigate the direct effects of IL-4 on cellular viability and surface expression of the high-affinity receptor for IgE, FcΞ΅RI. We observed that IL-4 elicits pronounced pro-survival signaling in basophils, delaying spontaneous apoptosis in vitro to a degree comparable to the known pro-survival effects of IL-3. Our data indicate that IL-4-mediated survival depends on PI3K/AKT signaling and-in contrast to IL-3-seems to be largely independent of transcriptional changes but effectuated by post-translational mechanisms affecting BCL-2 family members among others. Additionally, we found that IL-4 signaling has a stabilizing effect on the surface expression levels of the critical basophil activation receptor FcΞ΅RI. In summary, our findings indicate an important regulatory role of IL-4 on in vitro-differentiated mouse basophils enhancing their survival and stabilizing FcΞ΅RI receptor expression through PI3K-dependent signaling. A better understanding of the regulation of basophil survival will help to define promising targets and consequently treatment strategies in basophil-driven diseases