Phylogenomic analyses and distribution of terpene synthases among Streptomyces

This is the final version. Available on open access from Beilstein-Institut via the DOI in this recordTerpene synthases are widely distributed among microorganisms and have been mainly studied in members of the genus Streptomyces. However, little is known about the distribution and evolution of the genes for terpene synthases. Here, we performed whole-genome based phylogenetic analysis of Streptomyces species, and compared the distribution of terpene synthase genes among them. Overall, our study revealed that ten major types of terpene synthases are present within the genus Streptomyces, namely those for geosmin, 2-methylisoborneol, epi-isozizaene, 7-epi-α-eudesmol, epi-cubenol, caryolan-1-ol, cyclooctat-9-en-7-ol, isoafricanol, pentalenene and α-amorphene. The Streptomyces species divide in three phylogenetic groups based on their whole genomes for which the distribution of the ten terpene synthases was analysed. Geosmin synthases were the most widely distributed and were found to be evolutionary positively selected. Other terpene synthases were found to be specific for one of the three clades or a subclade within the genus Streptomyces. A phylogenetic analysis of the most widely distributed classes of Streptomyces terpene synthases in comparison to the phylogenomic analysis of this genus is discussed.NW

Genes Associated with 2-Methylisoborneol Biosynthesis in Cyanobacteria: Isolation, Characterization, and Expression in Response to Light

The volatile microbial metabolite 2-methylisoborneol (2-MIB) is a root cause of taste and odor issues in freshwater. Although current evidence suggests that 2-MIB is not toxic, this compound degrades water quality and presents problems for water treatment. To address these issues, cyanobacteria and actinomycetes, the major producers of 2-MIB, have been investigated extensively. In this study, two 2-MIB producing strains, coded as Pseudanabaena sp. and Planktothricoids raciborskii, were used in order to elucidate the genetic background, light regulation, and biochemical mechanisms of 2-MIB biosynthesis in cyanobacteria. Genome walking and PCR methods revealed that two adjacent genes, SAM-dependent methyltransferanse gene and monoterpene cyclase gene, are responsible for GPP methylation and subsequent cyclization to 2-MIB in cyanobacteria. These two genes are located in between two homologous cyclic nucleotide-binding protein genes that may be members of the Crp-Fnr regulator family. Together, this sequence of genes forms a putative operon. The synthesis of 2-MIB is similar in cyanobacteria and actinomycetes. Comparison of the gene arrangement and functional sites between cyanobacteria and other organisms revealed that gene recombination and gene transfer probably occurred during the evolution of 2-MIB-associated genes. All the microorganisms examined have a common origin of 2-MIB biosynthesis capacity, but cyanobacteria represent a unique evolutionary lineage. Gene expression analysis suggested that light is a crucial, but not the only, active regulatory factor for the transcription of 2-MIB synthesis genes. This light-regulated process is immediate and transient. This study is the first to identify the genetic background and evolution of 2-MIB biosynthesis in cyanobacteria, thus enhancing current knowledge on 2-MIB contamination of freshwater

Interactive models of communication at the nanoscale using nanoparticles that talk to one another

[EN] 'Communication' between abiotic nanoscale chemical systems is an almost-unexplored field with enormous potential. Here we show the design and preparation of a chemical communication system based on enzyme-powered Janus nanoparticles, which mimics an interactive model of communication. Cargo delivery from one nanoparticle is governed by the biunivocal communication with another nanoparticle, which involves two enzymatic processes and the interchange of chemical messengers. The conceptual idea of establishing communication between nanodevices opens the opportunity to develop complex nanoscale systems capable of sharing information and cooperating.A. L.-L. is grateful to 'La Caixa' Banking Foundation for his PhD fellowship. We wish to thank the Spanish Government (MINECO Projects MAT2015-64139-C4-1, CTQ2014-58989-P and CTQ2015-71936-REDT and AGL2015-70235-C2-2-R) and the Generalitat Valenciana (Project PROMETEOII/2014/047) for support. The Comunidad de Madrid (S2013/MIT-3029, Programme NANOAVANSENS) is also gratefully acknowledged.Llopis-Lorente, A.; Díez, P.; Sánchez, A.; Marcos Martínez, MD.; Sancenón Galarza, F.; Martínez-Ruiz, P.; Villalonga, R.... (2017). Interactive models of communication at the nanoscale using nanoparticles that talk to one another. Nature Communications. 8:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15511S178Tseng, R., Huang, J., Ouyang, J., Kaner, R. & Yang, Y. Polyaniline nanofiber/gold nanoparticle nonvolatile memory. Nano Lett. 5, 1077–1080 (2005).Liu, R. & Sen, A. Autonomous nanomotor based on copper-platinum segmented nanobattery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 20064–20067 (2011).Valov, I. et al. Nanobatteries in redox-based resistive switches require extension of memristor theory. Nat. Commun. 4, 1771 (2013).Tarn, D. et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticle nanocarriers: biofunctionality and biocompatibility. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 792–801 (2013).Kline, T. & Paxton, W. Catalytic nanomotors: remote-controlled autonomous movement of striped metallic nanorods. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 117, 754–756 (2005).Akyildiz, I. F., Brunetti, F. & Blázquez, C. Nanonetworks: a new communication paradigm. Comput. Netw. 52, 2260–2279 (2008).Suda, T., Moore, M., Nakano, T., Egashira, R. & Enomoto, A. Exploratory research on molecular communication between nanomachines. Nat. Comput. 25, 1–30 (2005).Malak, D. & Akan, O. B. Molecular communication nanonetworks inside human body. Nano Commun. Netw. 3, 19–35 (2012).Akyildiz, I. F., Jornet, J. M. & Pierobon, M. Nanonetworks: a new frontier in communications. Commun. ACM 54, 84–89 (2011).Nakano, T., Moore, M. J., Wei, F., Vasilakos, A. V. & Shuai, J. Molecular communication and networking: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 11, 135–148 (2012).Waters, C. M. & Bassler, B. L. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 319–346 (2005).Dickschat, J. S. Quorum sensing and bacterial biofilms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 27, 343–369 (2010).Kerényi, Á., Bihary, D., Venturi, V. & Pongor, S. Stability of multispecies bacterial communities: signaling networks may stabilize microbiomes. PLoS ONE 8, e57947 (2013).Gotti, C. & Clementi, F. Neuronal nicotinic receptors: from structure to pathology. Prog. Neurobiol. 74, 363–396 (2004).Betke, K. M., Wells, C. A. & Hamm, H. E. GPCR mediated regulation of synaptic transmission. Prog. Neurobiol. 96, 304–321 (2012).Qian, L., Winfree, E. & Bruck, J. Neural network computation with DNA strand displacement cascades. Nature 475, 368–372 (2011).Benenson, Y. Biomolecular computing systems: principles, progress and potential. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 455–468 (2012).Ball, P. Chemistry meets computing. Nature 406, 118–120 (2000).de Silva, A. P. & McClenaghan, N. D. Molecular-Scale Logic Gates. Chem. Eur. J. 10, 574–586 (2004).Condon, A. Automata make antisense. Nature 429, 351–352 (2004).Seelig, G., Soloveichik, D., Zhang, D. Y. & Winfree, E. Enzyme-free nucleic acid logic circuits. Science 314, 1585–1588 (2006).Douglas, S. M., Bachelet, I. & Church, G. M. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science 335, 831–834 (2012).Angelos, S., Yang, Y. W., Khashab, N. M., Stoddart, J. F. & Zink, J. I. Dual-controlled nanoparticles exhibiting AND logic. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 11344–11346 (2009).Liu, H. et al. Dual-responsive surfaces modified with phenylboronic acid-containing polymer brush to reversibly capture and release cancer cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 7603–7609 (2013).Lee, J. W. & Klajn, R. Dual-responsive nanoparticles that aggregate under the simultaneous action of light and CO2 . Chem. Commun. 51, 2036–2039 (2015).Liu, D. et al. Resettable, multi-readout logic gates based on controllably reversible aggregation of gold nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 4103–4107 (2011).Chitode, J. S. Communication Theory Technical Publications (2010).Wood, J. T. Communication in Our Lives Wadsworth (2009).Guardado-Alvarez, T. M., Sudha Devi, L., Russell, M. M., Schwartz, B. J. & Zink, J. I. Activation of snap-top capped mesoporous silica nanocontainers using two near-infrared photons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 14000–14003 (2013).Baeza, A., Guisasola, E., Ruiz-Hernández, E. & Vallet-Regí, M. Magnetically triggered multidrug release by hybrid mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 24, 517–524 (2012).Zhang, Z. et al. Biocatalytic release of an anticancer drug from nucleic-acids-capped mesoporous SiO2 using DNA or molecular biomarkers as triggering stimuli. ACS Nano 7, 8455–8468 (2013).Tang, F., Li, L. & Chen, D. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: synthesis, biocompatibility and drug delivery. Adv. Mater. 24, 1504–1534 (2012).Li, Z., Barnes, J. C., Bosoy, A., Stoddart, J. F. & Zink, J. I. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 2590–2605 (2012).Coll, C., Bernardos, A., Martínez-Máñez, R. & Sancenón, F. Gated silica mesoporous supports for controlled release and signaling applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 339–349 (2013).Aznar, E. et al. Gated materials for on-command release of guest molecules. Chem. Rev. 116, 561–718 (2016).Díez, P. et al. Toward the design of smart delivery systems controlled by integrated enzyme-based biocomputing ensembles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 9116–9123 (2014).Villalonga, R. et al. Enzyme-controlled sensing-actuating nanomachine based on Janus Au-mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chem. Eur. J. 19, 7889–7894 (2013).Jerez, G., Kaufman, G., Prystai, M., Schenkeveld, S. & Donkor, K. K. Determination of thermodynamic pKa values of benzimidazole and benzimidazole derivatives by capillary electrophoresis. J. Sep. Sci. 32, 1087–1095 (2009).Sheffner, A. L. The reduction in vitro in viscosity of mucoprotein solutions by a new mucolytic agent, N-acetyl-L-cysteine. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 106, 298–310 (1963).Turkevich, J., Stevenson, P. C. & Hillier, J. A study of the nucleation and growth processes in the synthesis of colloidal gold. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 11, 55–75 (1951).Frens, G. Controlled Nucleation for the Regulation of the Particle Size in Monodisperse Gold Suspensions. Nature 241, 20–22 (1973).Yousef, F. O., Zughul, M. B. & Badwan, A. A. The modes of complexation of benzimidazole with aqueous β-cyclodextrin explored by phase solubility, potentiometric titration, 1H-NMR and molecular modeling studies. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 57, 519–523 (2007).Sánchez, A., Díez, P., Martínez-Ruíz, P., Villalonga, R. & Pingarrón, J. M. Janus Au-mesoporous silica nanoparticles as electrochemical biorecognition-signaling system. Electrochem. Commun. 30, 51–54 (2013).Akyildiz, I. F., Pierobon, M., Balasubramaniam, S. & Koucheryavy, Y. The internet of Bio-Nano things. IEEE Commun. Mag. 53, 32–40 (2015).Sancenón, F., Pascual, L., Oroval, M., Aznar, E. & Martínez-Máñez, R. Gated silica mesoporous materials in sensing applications. ChemistryOpen 4, 418–437 (2015).Akyildiz, I. & Jornet, J. The Internet of nano-things. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 17, 58–63 (2010).Giménez, C. et al. Towards chemical communication between gated nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 12629–12633 (2014).Davis, B. G., Lloyd, R. C. & Jones, J. B. Controlled site-selective glycosylation of proteins by a combined site-directed mutagenesis and chemical modification approach. J. Org. Chem. 63, 9614–9615 (1998)

Bioactive Secondary Metabolites from a New Terrestrial Streptomyces sp. TN262

During our search for Streptomyces spp. as new producers of bioactive secondary metabolites, the ethyl acetate extract of the new terrestrial Streptomyces isolate TN262 delivered eight antimicrobially active compounds. They were identified as 1-acetyl-β-carboline (1), tryptophol (2), cineromycin B (3), 2,3-dihydrocineromycin B (4), cyclo-(tyrosylprolyl) (5), 3-(hydroxyacetyl)-indole (6), brevianamide F (7), and cis-cyclo-(l-prolyl-l-leucyl) (8). Three further metabolites were detected in the unpolar fractions using GC–MS and tentatively assigned as benzophenone (9), N-butyl-benzenesulfonamide (10), and hexanedioic acid-bis-(2-ethylhexyl) ester (11). This last compound is known as plasticizer derivatives, but it has never been described from natural sources. In this article, we describe the identification of the new Streptomyces sp. isolate TN262 using its cultural characteristics, the nucleotide sequence of the corresponding 16S rRNA gene and the phylogenetic analysis, followed by optimization, large-scale fermentation, isolation of the bioactive constituents, and determination of their structures. The biological activity of compounds (2), (3), (4), and those of the unpolar fractions was addressed as well

Bacteria are important dimethylsulfoniopropionate producers in coastal sediments

Dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) and its catabolite dimethyl sulfide (DMS) are key marine nutrients, with roles in global sulfur cycling, atmospheric chemistry, signalling and, potentially, climate regulation. DMSP production was previously thought to be an oxic and photic process, mainly confined to the surface oceans. However, here we show that DMSP concentrations and DMSP/DMS synthesis rates were higher in surface marine sediment from e.g., saltmarsh ponds, estuaries and the deep ocean than in the overlying seawater. A quarter of bacterial strains isolated from saltmarsh sediment produced DMSP (up to 73 mM), and previously unknown DMSP-producers were identified. Most DMSP-producing isolates contained dsyB, but some alphaproteobacteria, gammaproteobacteria and actinobacteria utilised a methionine methylation pathway independent of DsyB, previously only associated with higher plants. These bacteria contained a methionine methyltransferase ‘mmtN’ gene - a marker for bacterial DMSP synthesis via this pathway. DMSP-producing bacteria and their dsyB and/or mmtN transcripts were present in all tested seawater samples and Tara Oceans bacterioplankton datasets, but were far more abundant in marine surface sediment. Approximately 108 bacteria per gram of surface marine sediment are predicted to produce DMSP, and their contribution to this process should be included in future models of global DMSP production. We propose that coastal and marine sediments, which cover a large part of the Earth’s surface, are environments with high DMSP and DMS productivity, and that bacteria are important producers within them

DSYB catalyses the key step of dimethylsulfoniopropionate biosynthesis in many phytoplankton

Dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) is a globally important organosulfur molecule and the major precursor for dimethyl sulfide. These compounds are important info-chemicals, key nutrients for marine microorganisms, and are involved in global sulfur cycling, atmospheric chemistry and cloud formation1,2,3. DMSP production was thought to be confined to eukaryotes, but heterotrophic bacteria can also produce DMSP through the pathway used by most phytoplankton4, and the DsyB enzyme catalysing the key step of this pathway in bacteria was recently identified5. However, eukaryotic phytoplankton probably produce most of Earth’s DMSP, yet no DMSP biosynthesis genes have been identified in any such organisms. Here we identify functional dsyB homologues, termed DSYB, in many phytoplankton and corals. DSYB is a methylthiohydroxybutryate methyltransferase enzyme localized in the chloroplasts and mitochondria of the haptophyte Prymnesium parvum, and stable isotope tracking experiments support these organelles as sites of DMSP synthesis. DSYB transcription levels increased with DMSP concentrations in different phytoplankton and were indicative of intracellular DMSP. Identification of the eukaryotic DSYB sequences, along with bacterial dsyB, provides the first molecular tools to predict the relative contributions of eukaryotes and prokaryotes to global DMSP production. Furthermore, evolutionary analysis suggests that eukaryotic DSYB originated in bacteria and was passed to eukaryotes early in their evolution

Differential Attraction of Malaria Mosquitoes to Volatile Blends Produced by Human Skin Bacteria

The malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto is mainly guided by human odour components to find its blood host. Skin bacteria play an important role in the production of human body odour and when grown in vitro, skin bacteria produce volatiles that are attractive to A. gambiae. The role of single skin bacterial species in the production of volatiles that mediate the host-seeking behaviour of mosquitoes has remained largely unknown and is the subject of the present study. Headspace samples were taken to identify volatiles that mediate this behaviour. These volatiles could be used as mosquito attractants or repellents. Five commonly occurring species of skin bacteria were tested in an olfactometer for the production of volatiles that attract A. gambiae. Odour blends produced by some bacterial species were more attractive than blends produced by other species. In contrast to odours from the other bacterial species tested, odours produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa were not attractive to A. gambiae. Headspace analysis of bacterial volatiles in combination with behavioural assays led to the identification of six compounds that elicited a behavioural effect in A. gambiae. Our results provide, to our knowledge, the first evidence for a role of selected bacterial species, common on the human skin, in determining the attractiveness of humans to malaria mosquitoes. This information will be used in the further development of a blend of semiochemicals for the manipulation of mosquito behaviour