6 research outputs found

    Recognition and Management of Oral Mucosal Injury Caused by Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors: A Case Series

    No full text
    The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORIs) everolimus and temsirolimus are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of various forms of advanced cancer, and the mTORI sirolimus is approved as an immunosuppressive agent for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving renal transplants. The oral lesions associated with mTORI toxicity are distinct from the well-documented chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced mucositis, but they may often be misdiagnosed by medical oncologists or transplant physicians, potentially resulting in inappropriate management of this complication. mTORI-associated oral mucosal injury appears to be dose related, and its onset is consistently earlier than conventional mucositis associated with chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Although the lesions appear to resolve within approximately 2 weeks and do not seem to recur as severely with subsequent courses of therapy, the reduction in a patient's quality of life as a result of oral pain that affects the intake of nutritional foods should be taken into consideration. We report three cases that illustrate the complexity involved in the early assessment, referral, and appropriate management of mTORI-associated oral mucosal injury. Corticosteroids appear to be very useful in managing and perhaps preventing these lesions, whereas this approach has never shown efficacy in conventional chemotherapy-related mucositis. Early intervention to reduce the mTORI-associated oral mucosal injury is important to diminish the need for dose alterations of mTORIs and, therefore, to improve patient outcomes

    MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy

    No full text
    Background: Mucositis is a significant toxicity of cancer therapy with numerous systemic sequelae. The goal of this systematic review was to update the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of mucositis. Methods: The literature was reviewed systematically to identify interventions for mucositis. Studies were rated according to the presence of major and minor flaws according to previously published criteria. The body of evidence for each intervention and in each treatment setting was assigned a level of evidence based on previously published criteria. Guidelines were developed based on the level of evidence, with 3 possible guideline determinations: recommendation, suggestion, or no guideline possible. Results: The guideline covers evidence from 1197 publications related to oral or gastrointestinal mucositis. Thirteen new guidelines were developed for or against the use of various interventions in specific treatment settings, and 11 previous guidelines were confirmed after aa review of new evidence. Thirteen previously established guidelines were carried over because there was no new evidence for these interventions. Conclusions: The updated MASCC/ISOO Clinical Practice Guidelines for mucositis provide professional health caregivers with a clinical setting-specific, evidence-based tool to help with the management of mucositis in patients who have cancer
    corecore