Percepciones de productores sobre el bienestar de bovinos doble propósito en los llanos Orientales de Colombia

The aim of this observational-cross-sectional study was to determine the attitudes of producers regarding the welfare (CW) of double-purpose (DP) cattle. A face-to-face survey was carried out with 20 DP producers from Meta, Colombia to quantify their perceptions (using 5-point Likert scales) on the level of impact that environmental, health and management aspects have on CW and on the level of importance of indicators (environmental, management, health and affective states) of CW evaluation. The average scores awarded to each aspect and indicator were calculated. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences between categories of impact aspects and between categories of indicators. The health aspects were considered the ones with had the greatest impact (4.07/5), while the indicators of affective states were considered the least important (3.82). The key aspects categorized as 'Extreme Impact' factors were external parasite load (4.65), not checking colostrum intake (4.65), heat stress (4.55), myiasis (4.25) and disbudding/dehorning without anesthesia (4.25). Key indicators recognized as 'Essential' were access to shade (4.65), colostrum intake (4.55), staff skills (4.5), pup mortality (4.45) and drinking water (4.45). The results highlight the existing consensus between the impact of heat stress and the importance of the presence of shade as an indicator of CW, as well as between colostrum consumption and calf mortality. Likewise, there is evidence of a disagreement between the high impact of disbudding /dehorning without anesthesia and the low level of importance perceived as an essential indicator of CW.El objetivo de este estudio observacional-transversal fue determinar las actitudes de productores sobre el bienestar de bovinos (BB) doble-propósito (DP). Se realizó una encuesta presencial a 20 productores DP del Meta, Colombia, para cuantificar sus percepciones (utilizando escalas Likert de 5-puntos) sobre el nivel de impacto que tienen aspectos ambientales, de salud y de manejo en el BB y sobre el nivel de importancia de indicadores (ambientales, manejo, salud y estados afectivos) de evaluación del BB. Se calcularon las puntuaciones promedio otorgadas a cada aspecto e indicador. La prueba Kruskal-Wallis se utilizó para evaluar diferencias entre categorías de aspectos de impacto y entre categorías de indicadores. Los aspectos de salud fueron considerados como los de mayor impacto (4.07/5), mientras que los indicadores de estados afectivos fueron considerados como los de menor importancia (3.82). Los aspectos clave categorizados como factores de ‘Impacto extremo’ fueron carga parasitaria externa (4.65), no verificar consumo de calostro (4.65), estrés térmico (4.55), miasis (4.25) y topizar/descornar sin anestesia (4.25). Los indicadores clave reconocidos como ‘Esenciales’ fueron acceso a sombra (4.65), consumo de calostro (4.55), capacidades del personal (4.5), mortalidad de crías (4.45) y agua potable (4.45). Los resultados resaltan el consenso existente entre el impacto del estrés calórico y la importancia de la presencia de sombra como indicador de BB, así como entre el consumo de calostro y la mortalidad de crías. Asimismo, se evidencia un disenso entre el alto impacto que tiene topizar/descornar sin anestesia y el bajo nivel de importancia percibido como indicador esencial de BB

One Welfare for all: Associations between sheep welfare indicators and producers’ mental health

Objective. The objective of this observational cross-sectional study was to investigate associations between farmers’ mental health scores for stress, anxiety, depression, and resilience, and sheep welfare outcomes. Materials and methods. Twenty-two sheep farms in the departments of Boyacá, Cundinamarca, Tolima, and Meta, Colombia, were visited once. Clinical health, cleanliness, and calmness of randomly selected sheep per farm were scored to identify the number of animals with different welfare problems such as lameness, hoof overgrowth, and mastitis. A face-to-face interview with the farmer was done to gather demographic information (farm size and year of establishment, gender, age, role at the farm, and education) and to complete validated psychometric scales to assess resilience, stress, anxiety, and depression. Linear regression models were used to evaluate associations between farmers’ mental health scores, demographic aspects, and within-flock prevalence of sheep welfare indicators. Results. A total of 427 sheep were evaluated across farms. The most prevalent welfare problems identified were hoof overgrowth (40.9%) and dirty fleece (32.9%), while the least prevalent were clinical mastitis (1.3%) and respiratory issues (1.2%). Farmers’ stress level was positively associated with the prevalence of clinically lame sheep and farm size. Anxiety was positively associated with the prevalence of sheep with dirty fleece, clinical lameness, and with being a female farmer. Depression was positively associated with the prevalence of hoof overgrowth. Conclusions. Findings showed that higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression among farmers were associated with the presence of animal welfare problems, larger farms, and gender