The evolving SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Africa: Insights from rapidly expanding genomic surveillance

INTRODUCTION Investment in Africa over the past year with regard to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) sequencing has led to a massive increase in the number of sequences, which, to date, exceeds 100,000 sequences generated to track the pandemic on the continent. These sequences have profoundly affected how public health officials in Africa have navigated the COVID-19 pandemic. RATIONALE We demonstrate how the first 100,000 SARS-CoV-2 sequences from Africa have helped monitor the epidemic on the continent, how genomic surveillance expanded over the course of the pandemic, and how we adapted our sequencing methods to deal with an evolving virus. Finally, we also examine how viral lineages have spread across the continent in a phylogeographic framework to gain insights into the underlying temporal and spatial transmission dynamics for several variants of concern (VOCs). RESULTS Our results indicate that the number of countries in Africa that can sequence the virus within their own borders is growing and that this is coupled with a shorter turnaround time from the time of sampling to sequence submission. Ongoing evolution necessitated the continual updating of primer sets, and, as a result, eight primer sets were designed in tandem with viral evolution and used to ensure effective sequencing of the virus. The pandemic unfolded through multiple waves of infection that were each driven by distinct genetic lineages, with B.1-like ancestral strains associated with the first pandemic wave of infections in 2020. Successive waves on the continent were fueled by different VOCs, with Alpha and Beta cocirculating in distinct spatial patterns during the second wave and Delta and Omicron affecting the whole continent during the third and fourth waves, respectively. Phylogeographic reconstruction points toward distinct differences in viral importation and exportation patterns associated with the Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants and subvariants, when considering both Africa versus the rest of the world and viral dissemination within the continent. Our epidemiological and phylogenetic inferences therefore underscore the heterogeneous nature of the pandemic on the continent and highlight key insights and challenges, for instance, recognizing the limitations of low testing proportions. We also highlight the early warning capacity that genomic surveillance in Africa has had for the rest of the world with the detection of new lineages and variants, the most recent being the characterization of various Omicron subvariants. CONCLUSION Sustained investment for diagnostics and genomic surveillance in Africa is needed as the virus continues to evolve. This is important not only to help combat SARS-CoV-2 on the continent but also because it can be used as a platform to help address the many emerging and reemerging infectious disease threats in Africa. In particular, capacity building for local sequencing within countries or within the continent should be prioritized because this is generally associated with shorter turnaround times, providing the most benefit to local public health authorities tasked with pandemic response and mitigation and allowing for the fastest reaction to localized outbreaks. These investments are crucial for pandemic preparedness and response and will serve the health of the continent well into the 21st century

Evaluation of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for large-scale population testing in Senegal

Purpose: Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based testing remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Due to the high diagnosis demand of SARS-CoV-2 and the limited resources for RT-PCR testing, especially in Low-Income Countries (LICs), antigen-based methods are being considered as an option. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for large population screening compared to RT-PCR.Methods: This evaluation was conducted on 4146 participants including travelers and participants under household survey and vaccine evaluation studies before injection of the first dose. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swaps were collected from each participant into 2 mL of viral transport medium (VTM) and 400 μl of VTM were used to assess the performance of LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay, compared to RT-PCR. Results: The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 of the cohort was 4.5% with RT-PCR and 4.1% with LumiraDx antigen test. Compared to the RT-PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of the LumiraDx antigen SARS-CoV-2 test were 82,7% [95% CI 74.1-89,7] and 99.9% [95% CI 99.6-99.9] respectively. Given the RT-PCR threshold cycle (Ct) range, the sensitivity was 92.1% [95% CI 84.6-96.3] when the Ct value was below or equal 33 cycles, and 38.1% [95% CI 18.9-61.3] when it was above 33 cycles. The inter-rater reliability showed a kappa coefficient of 0.88 when considering all the patients and 0.94 for Ct values below 33 cycles. Conclusion: Our data have shown that the LumiraDx platform can be considered for large-scale testing of SARS-CoV-2

Dynamics of Variants of Concern (VOC) of SARS-CoV-2 during the Different Waves of COVID-19 in Senegal

Background: In Senegal, the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 evolved with four successive epidemic waves. The first wave started in March 2020 with low virus variability, whilst the second outbreak, which started in December 2020, was dominated by the Alpha variant. The third wave took place in June 2021, and the fourth at the end of November 2021. Our interest was to investigate the involvement of variants of concern during these four waves and to track the viral diversity of SARS-CoV-2. Methodology: During the four waves of the pandemic, 276,876 nasopharyngeal swabs were analyzed at the Institut de Recherche en Santé, de Surveillance Epidémiologique et de Formation (IRESSEF). Of these, 22,558 samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Then, the virus genomes were sequenced in 817 positive samples using the ARTIC Network of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). In addition, 10% of the negative samples in RT-PCR new variants were also targeted for the detection of new and previously undescribed variants. Results: Our data have overall shown that the Senegalese strains are very similar to each other or closely related to other strains, such as Gambia, France etc. During the first wave, the most common clade found was 19A (67.5%) and a majority of the samples were of the B.1 (50%) lineage. We noted more diversity during the second wave where clade 20A (38.4%) was more frequent, followed by clade 20B (31.52%) and 20I (9.74%). At the level of lineages, we identified variants of concern as B.1.1.7 (9.74%) and B.1.617.2 (0.86%). In the third wave, we observed at the clade level with mainly 21A (32.63%) and 21J (16.84%). During the fourth wave at the end of November 2021, we mainly identified clade 21K Omicron variant 21K (B.1.1.529 and BA.1) (80.47%) and Delta variant (21A, 21J, and 21I) (AY.103, AY.122, AY.122.1, AY.26, AY.34, AY.36, AY.4, AY.48, AY.57, AY.61, and AY.87) (14.06%). Impact: SARS-CoV-2 diversity may affect the virus’s properties, such as how it spreads, disease severity, or the performance of vaccines, tools, or other public health and social measures. Therefore, such tracking of SARS-CoV-2 variants is not only of public interest, but also highlights the role some African institutes such as IRESSEF with surveillance capabilities through the real-time sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 genomes in the local context. Conclusion: In Senegal, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has disrupted the organization of the health system. IRESSEF contributed to put in place strategies to respond effectively to the expectations of medical authorities by providing them with data on the strains circulating in Senegal at each moment of the epidemic