Electro-clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of post anoxic myoclonus

Objective: To systematically examine the electro-clinical characteristics of post anoxic myoclonus (PAM) and their prognostic implications in comatose cardiac arrest (CA) survivors. Methods: Fifty-nine CA survivors who developed myoclonus within 72 h of arrest and underwent continuous EEG monitoring were included in the study. Retrospective chart review was performed for all relevant clinical variables including time of PAM onset (“early onset” when within 24 h) and semiology (multi-focal, facial/ocular, whole body and limbs only). EEG findings including background, reactivity, epileptiform patterns and EEG correlate to myoclonus were reviewed at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Outcome was categorized as either with recovery of consciousness (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1–3) or without recovery of consciousness (CPC 4–5) at the time of discharge. Results: Seven of the 59 patients (11.9%) regained consciousness, including 6/51 (11.8%) with early onset PAM. Patients with recovery of consciousness had shorter time to ROSC, and were more likely to have preserved brainstem reflexes and normal voltage background at all times. No patient with suppression burst or low voltage background (N = 52) at any point regained consciousness. In the subset where precise electro-clinical correlation was possible, all (5/5) those with recovery of consciousness had multi-focal myoclonus and most (4/5) had midline-maximal spikes over a continuous background. No patient with any other semiology (N = 21) regained consciousness. Conclusions: Early onset PAM is not always associated with lack of recovery of consciousness. EEG can help discriminate between patients who may or may not regain consciousness by the time of hospital discharge.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Comparison of machine learning models for seizure prediction in hospitalized patients

Objective: To compare machine learning methods for predicting inpatient seizures risk and determine the feasibility of 1-h screening EEG to identify low-risk patients (<5% seizures risk in 48 h). Methods: The Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium (CCEMRC) multicenter database contains 7716 continuous EEGs (cEEG). Neural networks (NN), elastic net logistic regression (EN), and sparse linear integer model (RiskSLIM) were trained to predict seizures. RiskSLIM was used previously to generate 2HELPS2B model of seizure predictions. Data were divided into training (60% for model fitting) and evaluation (40% for model evaluation) cohorts. Performance was measured using area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), mean risk calibration (CAL), and negative predictive value (NPV). A secondary analysis was performed using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) to normalize all EEG recordings to 48 h and use only the first hour of EEG as a “screening EEG” to generate predictions. Results: RiskSLIM recreated the 2HELPS2B model. All models had comparable AUC: evaluation cohort (NN: 0.85, EN: 0.84, 2HELPS2B: 0.83) and MCS (NN: 0.82, EN; 0.82, 2HELPS2B: 0.81) and NPV (absence of seizures in the group that the models predicted to be low risk): evaluation cohort (NN: 97%, EN: 97%, 2HELPS2B: 97%) and MCS (NN: 97%, EN: 99%, 2HELPS2B: 97%). 2HELPS2B model was able to identify the largest proportion of low-risk patients. Interpretation: For seizure risk stratification of hospitalized patients, the RiskSLIM generated 2HELPS2B model compares favorably to the complex NN and EN generated models. 2HELPS2B is able to accurately and quickly identify low-risk patients with only a 1-h screening EEG.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Assessment of the Validity of the 2HELPS2B Score for Inpatient Seizure Risk Prediction

Importance: Seizure risk stratification is needed to boost inpatient seizure detection and to improve continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) cost-effectiveness. 2HELPS2B can address this need but requires validation. Objective: To use an independent cohort to validate the 2HELPS2B score and develop a practical guide for its use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter retrospective medical record review analyzed clinical and EEG data from patients 18 years or older with a clinical indication for cEEG and an EEG duration of 12 hours or longer who were receiving consecutive cEEG at 6 centers from January 2012 to January 2019. 2HELPS2B was evaluated with the validation cohort using the mean calibration error (CAL), a measure of the difference between prediction and actual results. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine the duration of EEG monitoring to achieve a seizure risk of less than 5% based on the 2HELPS2B score calculated on first- hour (screening) EEG. Participants undergoing elective epilepsy monitoring and those who had experienced cardiac arrest were excluded. No participants who met the inclusion criteria were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was a CAL error of less than 5% in the validation cohort. Results: The study included 2111 participants (median age, 51 years; 1113 men [52.7%]; median EEG duration, 48 hours) and the primary outcome was met with a validation cohort CAL error of 4.0% compared with a CAL of 2.7% in the foundational cohort (P =.13). For the 2HELPS2B score calculated on only the first hour of EEG in those without seizures during that hour, the CAL error remained at less than 5.0% at 4.2% and allowed for stratifying patients into low- (2HELPS2B = 0; 25%) groups. Each of the categories had an associated minimum recommended duration of EEG monitoring to achieve at least a less than 5% risk of seizures, a 2HELPS2B score of 0 at 1-hour screening EEG, a 2HELPS2B score of 1 at 12 hours, and a 2HELPS2B score of 2 or greater at 24 hours. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, 2HELPS2B was validated as a clinical tool to aid in seizure detection, clinical communication, and cEEG use in hospitalized patients. In patients without prior clinical seizures, a screening 1-hour EEG that showed no epileptiform findings was an adequate screen. In patients with any highly epileptiform EEG patterns during the first hour of EEG (ie, a 2HELPS2B score of ≥2), at least 24 hours of recording is recommended.SCOPUS: cp.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Deep active learning for Interictal Ictal Injury Continuum EEG patterns

Objectives: Seizures and seizure-like electroencephalography (EEG) patterns, collectively referred to as “ictal interictal injury continuum” (IIIC) patterns, are commonly encountered in critically ill patients. Automated detection is important for patient care and to enable research. However, training accurate detectors requires a large labeled dataset. Active Learning (AL) may help select informative examples to label, but the optimal AL approach remains unclear. Methods: We assembled >200,000 h of EEG from 1,454 hospitalized patients. From these, we collected 9,808 labeled and 120,000 unlabeled 10-second EEG segments. Labels included 6 IIIC patterns. In each AL iteration, a Dense-Net Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) learned vector representations for EEG segments using available labels, which were used to create a 2D embedding map. Nearest-neighbor label spreading within the embedding map was used to create additional pseudo-labeled data. A second Dense-Net was trained using real- and pseudo-labels. We evaluated several strategies for selecting candidate points for experts to label next. Finally, we compared two methods for class balancing within queries: standard balanced-based querying (SBBQ), and high confidence spread-based balanced querying (HCSBBQ). Results: Our results show: 1) Label spreading increased convergence speed for AL. 2) All query criteria produced similar results to random sampling. 3) HCSBBQ query balancing performed best. Using label spreading and HCSBBQ query balancing, we were able to train models approaching expert-level performance across all pattern categories after obtaining ∼7000 expert labels. Conclusion: Our results provide guidance regarding the use of AL to efficiently label large EEG datasets in critically ill patients.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe