Outcomes of macular hole surgery in severely myopic eyes: a case-control study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of macular hole surgery in highly myopic eyes and to compare these outcomes with a control group of eyes that were not severely myopic. METHODS: The study design was a matched, case-control, retrospective chart review. The participants included 26 eyes of 24 patients who had vitreous surgery for macular holes. The eyes were divided into two groups: 13 consecutive eyes with severe myopia (defined as −6.00 diopters of refractive error or greater) and 13 control eyes without severe myopia that were operated on immediately before or after each study eye, with the most recently operated eye chosen. The main outcome parameters were preoperative and final follow-up visual acuity, macular hole closure rates, reoperation rates, duration of preoperative symptoms, and follow-up time. RESULTS: Using the Snellen equivalent of logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) units, visual acuity improved after macular hole surgery in severely myopic eyes from 20/152 to 20/89 ( P = .041) and in control eyes from 20/152 to 20/47 ( P < .001). At final follow-up, visual acuities were lower in severely myopic eyes compared with control eyes ( P = .048). Macular hole closure rates, reoperation rates, duration of pre-operative symptoms, and follow-up intervals were not significantly different statistically between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Macular hole surgery results in anatomical and visual improvements in severely myopic eyes but generally yields poorer visual acuity outcomes compared with eyes that are not severely myopic

Evaluating outpatient versus inpatient costs in endophthalmitis management

To assess the cost savings that would result from 1) implementing the treatment guidelines of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS) and 2) performing procedures on an outpatient rather than an inpatient basis, and to compare the savings to the cost of conducting the EVS. The coding algorithms for four endophthalmitis treatment groups were obtained from Patient Financial Services at the Anne Bates Leach Eye Hospital (ABLEH) and national Medicare averages were consulted for reimbursements in 2000 dollars. The four groups were: 1) inpatient pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with intravenous antibiotics; 2) outpatient PPV; 3) inpatient vitreous tap with intravenous antibiotics; and 4) outpatient vitreous tap. Physician reimbursements were calculated using International Classification of Diseases-9 (ICD-9) diagnoses and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Facility reimbursements were calculated using ICD-9 diagnoses and Diagnosis-Related Group codes for inpatient procedures versus Ambulatory Payment Classification codes for outpatient procedures. The annual savings in reimbursements were estimated for a range of annual incidence rates of endophthalmitis assuming ABLEH financial data across all patients in the United States, and the savings into the future as well as the total expenses of conducting the EVS from 1989 to 1995 were summed in 2000 dollars using a net present value analysis based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price indices. Facility reimbursements are significantly higher for procedures performed on an inpatient compared to an outpatient basis (P < 0.001). Treating endophthalmitis according to the EVS guidelines on an outpatient basis would be associated with an estimated $1.5 to$7.8 million reduction in reimbursements per year. The cost of the EVS in 2000 dollars was $4.0 million. Implementing the treatment guidelines of the EVS on an outpatient basis may result in significant cost savings--savings that may cover the entire cost of the EVS in 3 years

A controlled trial of the effectiveness of internet continuing medical education

Abstract Background The internet has had a strong impact on how physicians access information and on the development of continuing medical education activities. Evaluation of the effectiveness of these activities has lagged behind their development. Methods To determine the effectiveness of a group of 48 internet continuing medical education (CME) activities, case vignette surveys were administered to US physicians immediately following participation, and to a representative control group of non-participant physicians. Responses to case vignettes were analyzed based on evidence presented in the content of CME activities. An effect size for each activity was calculated using Cohen's d to determine the amount of difference between the two groups in the likelihood of making evidence-based clinical decisions, expressed as the percentage of non-overlap, between the two groups. Two formats were compared. Results In a sample of 5621 US physicians, of the more than 100,000 physicians who participated in 48 internet CME activities, the average effect size was 0.75, an increased likelihood of 45% that participants were making choices in response to clinical case vignettes based on clinical evidence. This likelihood was higher in interactive case-based activities, 51% (effect size 0.89), than for text-based clinical updates, 40% (effect size 0.63). Effectiveness was also higher among primary care physicians than specialists. Conclusion Physicians who participated in selected internet CME activities were more likely to make evidence-based clinical choices than non-participants in response to clinical case vignettes. Internet CME activities show promise in offering a searchable, credible, available on-demand, high-impact source of CME for physicians.</p