1,548 research outputs found
Publicity notes
2 pages. Typewritten notes on publicity for the 25th Anniversary with committee members and assignments
Letter to Senator Capper from O.P. Dellinger
Letter to the Honorable Arthur Capper, United States Senator from Kansas from O.P. Dellinger, requesting his presence as speaker at the Silver Jubilee, January 7, 193
Steering Committee - 25th Anniversary
Roll of those in the Steering Committee-25th Anniversar
Notes about President Brandenburg
Notes about Brandenburg, signed (typewritten), Dean O.P. Dellinge
Notes on Brandenburg\u27s accomplishments
3 pages. Notes, W.A. Brandenbug, President of the Kansas State Teachers College, Pittsburg, Kansas. Lists Brandenburg\u27s accomplishments (typewritten) with handwritten additional notes, initials E.E.R. and Report of Sub-Committee on Celebratio
Letter to C.M. Miller from C.P. Dellinger
Letter written to Mr. C.M. Miller, Director of Vocational Education, Topeka, Kansas, from C.P. Dellinger, November 8, 1937 regarding planning for the Brandenburg Celebratio
Letter from O.P. Dellinger to Governor Davis
Letter from O.P. Dellinger to the Honorable Jonathan M. Davis, Bronson, Kansas, inviting him to the Silver Jubilee, February 22, 193
Rex E. Lee Conference on the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States: Clinton II Panel
I will say a few words about Dickerson, both because Michael has made it impossible not to and also because in some ways it represents the very best about how all of the wonderful, tried-and-true processes of the SG\u27s Office ought to work. Dickerson was very much like the other case that Michael talked about (which is one of, I think, two significant privilege controversies which the Independent Counsel laid on our doorstep). These cases may have appeared to the outside world as paradigmatically cases in which we would be hearing from the White House, or talking to the White House, or thinking about things other than the long-term institutional interests of the United States. But absolutely nothing of the sort ever happened, nor was any effort made by any political person to intrude in our decision-making policy
Solicitors General Panel on the Legacy of the Rehnquist Court
All of us who are speaking probably share the same giddy feeling in front of a microphone with no red light. For years, my daughter told people that the greatest threat to Western civilization was her father at a podium without a red light. Before becoming Solicitor General, I spent my career as a trial lawyer, arguing only a few appeals. I found this red light tradition a little peculiar. More often than not, timers and lights in courts of appeals are viewed as advisory at best. I\u27ve had arguments where ten minutes were allocated per side, and yet argument extended until the afternoon. In another case that allocated ninety minutes per side and began at nine o\u27clock, we didn\u27t actually finish until four o\u27clock in the afternoon. So coming into the SG\u27s office, my view about the red light was, well, perhaps it shows your time has nominally expired, but undoubtedly the Justices will have other questions. And in any event, I might want to take a few extra minutes to address additional points. That was so wrong. The red light ended everything-absolutely everything-and not just for the advocates; it also ended the questioning of the Associate Justices. The Chief Justice was an equal opportunity cutter-offer. On many occasions, he cut off oral argument when a Justice was at the outset of a question he or she had been trying to get out in the open oral combat that was advocacy in the Supreme Court of Chief Justice Rehnquist
- …