Engineered Biochar Production and Its Potential Benefits in a Closed-Loop Water-Reuse Agriculture System

Biochar’s potential to remove various contaminants from aqueous solutions has been widely discussed. The rapid development of engineered biochar produced using different feedstock materials via various methods for wastewater treatment in recent years urges an up-to-date review on this topic. This article centers on summarizing state-of-the-art methods for engineered biochar production and discussing the multidimensional benefits of applying biochar for water reuse and soil amendment in a closed-loop agriculture system. Based on numerous recent articles (<5 years) published in journals indexed in the Web of Science, engineered biochar’s production methods, modification techniques, physicochemical properties, and performance in removing inorganic, organic, and emerging contaminants from wastewater are reviewed in this study. It is concluded that biochar-based technologies have great potential to be used for treating both point-source and diffuse-source wastewater in agricultural systems, thus decreasing water demand while improving crop yields. As biochar can be produced using crop residues and other biomass wastes, its on-farm production and subsequent applications in a closed-loop agriculture system will not only eliminate expensive transportation costs, but also create a circular flow of materials and energy that promotes additional environmental and economic benefits

Impact of Ammonia-Based Aeration Control (ABAC) on Energy Consumption

An Ammonia-Based Aeration Control (ABAC) system is installed in the primary aeration basins of a regional wastewater treatment facility. The energy consumption of the system of air blowers, measured in kilowatts per hour by an existing meter, is analyzed for seven months after the installation of the ABAC system and compared to system performance prior to commissioning of the ABAC system. Processed data, including volume flow rate, ammonia loading, and treatment equipment efficiency, are evaluated for periods before and after the ABAC system installation. Ammonia mass loading and air transfer ratio in the aeration basins are determined to be the leading factors affecting the performance of the ABAC system and thus impacting the metered energy consumption. The metered energy consumption data are normalized by the two calculated ratios, which reflect the change in ammonia loading and air transfer ratio. The normalized and metered energy consumption data are compared, and the results show a reduction in energy consumption since the installation of the ABAC system. A yearly savings of approximately 9 ± 1% in energy costs is estimated with the installation of the ABAC system. The savings in energy consumption calculated as well as the improvements in nitrification efficiency confirm the benefit of an ABAC system in reducing operation costs and enhancing process control