Evaluation of Police Officers

Ocjenjivanje policijskih službenika rezultat je hijerarhijskog nadzora kojeg provodi neposredno nadređeni rukovoditelj nad podređenim policijskim službenikom. To je zakonska obaveza koja se provodi jednom godišnje a svrha je usmjeravanje na kvalitetno i učinkovito obavljanje službenih zadaća sukladno s propisima i pravilima struke, poticanje na osobno ponašanje sukladno s odredbama Etičkog kodeksa policijskih službenika, te utvrđivanje njihova doprinosa u obavljanju poslova. Postupak ocjenjivanja rada policijskih službenika formalno je propisan te se provodi kroz tri faze. Tijekom cjelogodišnjeg hijerarhijskog nadzora uloga neposrednog rukovoditelja značajna je i ključna. Naime, on je vođa tima, savjetnik, motivator, podrška, nadzornik; a ujedno i predlagatelj konačne godišnje ocjene. Neizmjerno su važne njegove vještine uspješnog komuniciranja, savjetovanja, motiviranja i vođenja policijskih službenika. Tijekom provedbe postupka ocjenjivanja te procjenjivanja radne uspješnosti policijskog službenika može doći do niza problema i pogrešaka. Kako bi se neutralizirali problemi i pogreške, rukovoditelj mora imati elementarna znanja o ocjenjivanja te treba biti upoznat s pogreškama kod ocjenjivanja. Ocjena koju donosi mora biti što objektivnija i ekvivalentna postignutim uspjesima policijskog službenika i njegovu ponašanju. Predmet razmatranja rada jest istraživanje svih elemenata procesa ocjenjivanja policijskih službenika, pravnih propisa na kojima se ono temelji ili ih se dotiče, problema koji se u tom procesu javljaju te iznošenje prijedloga za unaprjeđenje cjelokupnog procesa.The evaluation of police officers is the result of hierarchical supervision carried out by the immediate superior over the subordinate police officer. It is a legal obligation that is implemented once a year and the purpose is to focus on quality and efficient performance of official duties in accordance with regulations and rules of the profession, encouraging personal behavior in accordance with the Police Code of Ethics, and determining their contribution to work. The procedure for evaluating the work of police officers is formally prescribed and is carried out in three phases. During the year-round hierarchical supervision, the role of the immediate supervisor is significant and crucial. Namely, he is a team leader, advisor, motivator, support, supervisor; and at the same time the one who proposes the final annual grade. His skills of successful communication, counseling, motivating and guiding police officers are extremely important. A number of problems and errors can occur during the implementation of the evaluation process and the performance analysis of a police officer. In order to neutralize problems and mistakes, the manager must have a basic knowledge of assessment and should be aware of assessment errors. The evaluation he makes must be as objective as possible and equivalent to the successes of the police officer and his behavior

Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions in Croatia – A Hazard for Humans and Animals

Wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC) have increased and now there is a world-wide problem related to significant mortality of wildlife, habitat fragmentation, change in behavior and even disappearance of local endangered populations. Along with these deleterious effects on wildlife, WVC can also result in injuries and deaths of humans. During the three-year monitoring, a total of 7,495 wildlife-vehicle collisions were recorded, including mainly roe deer (73%), while other species were less frequently affected (wild boar – 9%; brown hare – 5%; and red deer and pheasant each with 4%). Incidence of wildlife-vehicle collisions were observed according to territorial distribution, seasonal and daily occurrence and type of road (total and per 1 km)

Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions in Croatia – A Hazard for Humans and Animals

Wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC) have increased and now there is a world-wide problem related to significant mortality of wildlife, habitat fragmentation, change in behavior and even disappearance of local endangered populations. Along with these deleterious effects on wildlife, WVC can also result in injuries and deaths of humans. During the three-year monitoring, a total of 7,495 wildlife-vehicle collisions were recorded, including mainly roe deer (73%), while other species were less frequently affected (wild boar – 9%; brown hare – 5%; and red deer and pheasant each with 4%). Incidence of wildlife-vehicle collisions were observed according to territorial distribution, seasonal and daily occurrence and type of road (total and per 1 km)

Evaluation of Police Officers

Ocjenjivanje policijskih službenika rezultat je hijerarhijskog nadzora kojeg provodi neposredno nadređeni rukovoditelj nad podređenim policijskim službenikom. To je zakonska obaveza koja se provodi jednom godišnje a svrha je usmjeravanje na kvalitetno i učinkovito obavljanje službenih zadaća sukladno s propisima i pravilima struke, poticanje na osobno ponašanje sukladno s odredbama Etičkog kodeksa policijskih službenika, te utvrđivanje njihova doprinosa u obavljanju poslova. Postupak ocjenjivanja rada policijskih službenika formalno je propisan te se provodi kroz tri faze. Tijekom cjelogodišnjeg hijerarhijskog nadzora uloga neposrednog rukovoditelja značajna je i ključna. Naime, on je vođa tima, savjetnik, motivator, podrška, nadzornik; a ujedno i predlagatelj konačne godišnje ocjene. Neizmjerno su važne njegove vještine uspješnog komuniciranja, savjetovanja, motiviranja i vođenja policijskih službenika. Tijekom provedbe postupka ocjenjivanja te procjenjivanja radne uspješnosti policijskog službenika može doći do niza problema i pogrešaka. Kako bi se neutralizirali problemi i pogreške, rukovoditelj mora imati elementarna znanja o ocjenjivanja te treba biti upoznat s pogreškama kod ocjenjivanja. Ocjena koju donosi mora biti što objektivnija i ekvivalentna postignutim uspjesima policijskog službenika i njegovu ponašanju. Predmet razmatranja rada jest istraživanje svih elemenata procesa ocjenjivanja policijskih službenika, pravnih propisa na kojima se ono temelji ili ih se dotiče, problema koji se u tom procesu javljaju te iznošenje prijedloga za unaprjeđenje cjelokupnog procesa.The evaluation of police officers is the result of hierarchical supervision carried out by the immediate superior over the subordinate police officer. It is a legal obligation that is implemented once a year and the purpose is to focus on quality and efficient performance of official duties in accordance with regulations and rules of the profession, encouraging personal behavior in accordance with the Police Code of Ethics, and determining their contribution to work. The procedure for evaluating the work of police officers is formally prescribed and is carried out in three phases. During the year-round hierarchical supervision, the role of the immediate supervisor is significant and crucial. Namely, he is a team leader, advisor, motivator, support, supervisor; and at the same time the one who proposes the final annual grade. His skills of successful communication, counseling, motivating and guiding police officers are extremely important. A number of problems and errors can occur during the implementation of the evaluation process and the performance analysis of a police officer. In order to neutralize problems and mistakes, the manager must have a basic knowledge of assessment and should be aware of assessment errors. The evaluation he makes must be as objective as possible and equivalent to the successes of the police officer and his behavior